{"title":"Global exponential stabilization of 2 × 2 linear hyperbolic PDEs via dynamic event-triggered backstepping control","authors":"Bhathiya Rathnayake , Mamadou Diagne","doi":"10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper introduces novel dynamic event-triggered control (ETC) mechanisms for 2 × 2 linear hyperbolic PDEs in three configurations: continuous-time event-triggered control (CETC), periodic event-triggered control (PETC), and self-triggered control (STC). These mechanisms ensure global exponential stability (GES) under ETC using PDE backstepping, with stability estimates provided in the spatial <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>L</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> norm of the states. The proposed CETC and PETC designs are observer-based and require continuous boundary measurements collocated with the actuation. In contrast, the STC design requires full-state measurements; however, unlike CETC and PETC, it does not require continuous measurements for the triggering mechanism—only measurements taken at event times. In the CETC design, a lower bound on the time between two consecutive events is enforced, and a dynamic variable with appropriately designed switching dynamics is introduced. By employing a novel Lyapunov functional, GES of the closed-loop system is established under zero-order hold implementation of the backstepping control between events. Events are triggered when the dynamic variable crosses zero from the positive side, after which it is immediately reset to an appropriate nonnegative value. Detecting events, therefore, necessitates continuous monitoring of this dynamic variable. To address this limitation, PETC and STC strategies are proposed. The PETC design identifies a suitable triggering condition that requires only periodic checks and derives an upper bound on the allowable sampling period. This PETC approach preserves the GES guaranteed by CETC without requiring continuous monitoring of a triggering condition, although it still relies on continuous measurements. Unlike CETC and PETC, STC requires neither continuous measurements nor monitoring of a triggering condition. Instead, at each event, STC computes the time to the next event — beyond a suitably enforced minimal dwell-time — using only measurements taken at events. Despite relying solely on event-triggered measurements, STC is capable of guaranteeing GES of the closed-loop system. The well-posedness of the closed-loop systems under all three strategies is established. A simulation study is provided to illustrate the theoretical results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55413,"journal":{"name":"Automatica","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 112617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automatica","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005109825005138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper introduces novel dynamic event-triggered control (ETC) mechanisms for 2 × 2 linear hyperbolic PDEs in three configurations: continuous-time event-triggered control (CETC), periodic event-triggered control (PETC), and self-triggered control (STC). These mechanisms ensure global exponential stability (GES) under ETC using PDE backstepping, with stability estimates provided in the spatial norm of the states. The proposed CETC and PETC designs are observer-based and require continuous boundary measurements collocated with the actuation. In contrast, the STC design requires full-state measurements; however, unlike CETC and PETC, it does not require continuous measurements for the triggering mechanism—only measurements taken at event times. In the CETC design, a lower bound on the time between two consecutive events is enforced, and a dynamic variable with appropriately designed switching dynamics is introduced. By employing a novel Lyapunov functional, GES of the closed-loop system is established under zero-order hold implementation of the backstepping control between events. Events are triggered when the dynamic variable crosses zero from the positive side, after which it is immediately reset to an appropriate nonnegative value. Detecting events, therefore, necessitates continuous monitoring of this dynamic variable. To address this limitation, PETC and STC strategies are proposed. The PETC design identifies a suitable triggering condition that requires only periodic checks and derives an upper bound on the allowable sampling period. This PETC approach preserves the GES guaranteed by CETC without requiring continuous monitoring of a triggering condition, although it still relies on continuous measurements. Unlike CETC and PETC, STC requires neither continuous measurements nor monitoring of a triggering condition. Instead, at each event, STC computes the time to the next event — beyond a suitably enforced minimal dwell-time — using only measurements taken at events. Despite relying solely on event-triggered measurements, STC is capable of guaranteeing GES of the closed-loop system. The well-posedness of the closed-loop systems under all three strategies is established. A simulation study is provided to illustrate the theoretical results.
期刊介绍:
Automatica is a leading archival publication in the field of systems and control. The field encompasses today a broad set of areas and topics, and is thriving not only within itself but also in terms of its impact on other fields, such as communications, computers, biology, energy and economics. Since its inception in 1963, Automatica has kept abreast with the evolution of the field over the years, and has emerged as a leading publication driving the trends in the field.
After being founded in 1963, Automatica became a journal of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) in 1969. It features a characteristic blend of theoretical and applied papers of archival, lasting value, reporting cutting edge research results by authors across the globe. It features articles in distinct categories, including regular, brief and survey papers, technical communiqués, correspondence items, as well as reviews on published books of interest to the readership. It occasionally publishes special issues on emerging new topics or established mature topics of interest to a broad audience.
Automatica solicits original high-quality contributions in all the categories listed above, and in all areas of systems and control interpreted in a broad sense and evolving constantly. They may be submitted directly to a subject editor or to the Editor-in-Chief if not sure about the subject area. Editorial procedures in place assure careful, fair, and prompt handling of all submitted articles. Accepted papers appear in the journal in the shortest time feasible given production time constraints.