Low-contrast detectability of a mobile head CT compared with conventional CT

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Robert Vorbau , Markus Hulthén , Pierre Hillergren , Artur Omar
{"title":"Low-contrast detectability of a mobile head CT compared with conventional CT","authors":"Robert Vorbau ,&nbsp;Markus Hulthén ,&nbsp;Pierre Hillergren ,&nbsp;Artur Omar","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>To investigate the image quality of a newly introduced mobile head CT system in comparison with a modern stationary CT scanner, emphasizing low-contrast detectability pertinent to brain imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>The Siemens On.site mobile head CT system has been compared with the conventional Siemens X.ceed scanner under matching imaging conditions. Measures of spatial resolution (TTF), noise (NPS), and noise equivalent quanta (NEQ), along with low-contrast detectability in terms of the spatial-domain channelized Hotelling observer, have been assessed. These quantitative evaluations were performed by scanning the Catphan 191 (head) MITA phantom using typical head CT imaging settings. This phantom, which is about the size of an adult head, contains a uniform section to measure noise, and a section with cylindrical features of varying diameters (2–15 mm) and contrasts (3–9 HU) to measure resolution and low-contrast detectability. Statistical significance was tested with a paired two-sample t-test.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The two scanners exhibited similar spatial resolution. However, the mobile head CT was associated with less noise, thereby improving the NEQ by approximately 10%, suggesting a higher efficiency of scanner dose utilization. In terms of low contrast detectability, the mobile head CT performed better by 5%–34%, depending on the size of the feature, its contrast, and whether iterative reconstruction was used or not. This improvement was found to be statistically significant (<span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span>-value less than 0.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The On.site mobile head CT system represents progress in mobile scanning technology, providing low-contrast detectability that is non-inferior compared with modern stationary CT scanners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 105177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972500287X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:

To investigate the image quality of a newly introduced mobile head CT system in comparison with a modern stationary CT scanner, emphasizing low-contrast detectability pertinent to brain imaging.

Methods:

The Siemens On.site mobile head CT system has been compared with the conventional Siemens X.ceed scanner under matching imaging conditions. Measures of spatial resolution (TTF), noise (NPS), and noise equivalent quanta (NEQ), along with low-contrast detectability in terms of the spatial-domain channelized Hotelling observer, have been assessed. These quantitative evaluations were performed by scanning the Catphan 191 (head) MITA phantom using typical head CT imaging settings. This phantom, which is about the size of an adult head, contains a uniform section to measure noise, and a section with cylindrical features of varying diameters (2–15 mm) and contrasts (3–9 HU) to measure resolution and low-contrast detectability. Statistical significance was tested with a paired two-sample t-test.

Results:

The two scanners exhibited similar spatial resolution. However, the mobile head CT was associated with less noise, thereby improving the NEQ by approximately 10%, suggesting a higher efficiency of scanner dose utilization. In terms of low contrast detectability, the mobile head CT performed better by 5%–34%, depending on the size of the feature, its contrast, and whether iterative reconstruction was used or not. This improvement was found to be statistically significant (p-value less than 0.02).

Conclusion:

The On.site mobile head CT system represents progress in mobile scanning technology, providing low-contrast detectability that is non-inferior compared with modern stationary CT scanners.
移动式头部CT与常规CT的低对比度检测
目的:研究新推出的移动头部CT系统与现代固定CT扫描仪的图像质量,强调与脑成像相关的低对比度可检测性。方法:西门子On。在匹配成像条件下,对现场移动式头部CT系统与传统西门子X.ceed扫描仪进行了比较。对空间分辨率(TTF)、噪声(NPS)和噪声等效量子(NEQ)的测量,以及在空域信道化霍特林观测器方面的低对比度可探测性进行了评估。这些定量评估是通过使用典型的头部CT成像设置扫描Catphan 191(头部)MITA幻象进行的。这个幻影大约是一个成人头部的大小,包含一个用于测量噪声的均匀部分,以及一个具有不同直径(2-15毫米)和对比度(3-9 HU)的圆柱形特征的部分,用于测量分辨率和低对比度可探测性。采用配对双样本t检验检验统计学显著性。结果:两种扫描仪具有相似的空间分辨率。然而,移动式头部CT与更少的噪声相关,从而将NEQ提高了约10%,表明扫描仪剂量利用效率更高。在低对比度检测方面,根据特征的大小、对比度以及是否使用迭代重建,移动头部CT的检测效果更好,可达5%-34%。这种改善在统计学上是显著的(p值小于0.02)。结论:。现场移动头部CT系统代表了移动扫描技术的进步,与现代固定式CT扫描仪相比,它提供的低对比度检测能力并不逊色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信