Cambios en la actitud de los profesionales sanitarios frente a la vacunación antigripal tras la pandemia por COVID-19

IF 1.1 Q4 NURSING

Enfermeria Clinica Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfcli.2025.502189

Marta Sánchez-Zaballos , David Zuazua-Rico , Lucía Alonso-Méndez , Yolanda Queipo-Herías , María Pilar Mosteiro-Díaz , Alba Maestro-Gonzalez

{"title":"Cambios en la actitud de los profesionales sanitarios frente a la vacunación antigripal tras la pandemia por COVID-19","authors":"Marta Sánchez-Zaballos , David Zuazua-Rico , Lucía Alonso-Méndez , Yolanda Queipo-Herías , María Pilar Mosteiro-Díaz , Alba Maestro-Gonzalez","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2025.502189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyse the attitude of health professionals towards influenza vaccination before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to identify differences between them and with respect to sociodemographic and occupational variables.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional descriptive study comparing the results of the 2017-2018 and 2020-2021 influenza vaccination campaigns. Sociodemographic, occupational, and vaccination-related variables were collected. A descriptive and bivariate analysis were performed, as well as a binary logistic regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 973 health professionals participated, with an average age of 41,13 (SD 11,16), showing a higher prevalence of vaccination during the 2020-2021 season (OR=1,04; IC 95% 1,03-1,05; p <0,001). The percentage of men who were vaccinated was higher in the 2020-2021 campaign <em>(P</em>=.02), in which a greater number of professionals with a non-stable contract <em>(P</em><.001) and lower mean age <em>(P</em>=.03) were also vaccinated. There were multiple statistical differences when comparing the reasons for accepting or refusing the vaccine, with more people being more likely to be vaccinated during the pandemic if there was a favourable atmosphere in the work or family environment <em>(P</em><.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Health professionals áttitude towards influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic showed better results than the previous campaign, with a higher number of professionals vaccinated and a better perception of immunisation. Differences were also found between the campaigns and socio-demographic variables (sex, age, and type of employment contract).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":"35 5","pages":"Article 502189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862125000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To analyse the attitude of health professionals towards influenza vaccination before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to identify differences between them and with respect to sociodemographic and occupational variables.

Methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study comparing the results of the 2017-2018 and 2020-2021 influenza vaccination campaigns. Sociodemographic, occupational, and vaccination-related variables were collected. A descriptive and bivariate analysis were performed, as well as a binary logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 973 health professionals participated, with an average age of 41,13 (SD 11,16), showing a higher prevalence of vaccination during the 2020-2021 season (OR = 1,04; IC 95% 1,03-1,05; p < 0,001). The percentage of men who were vaccinated was higher in the 2020-2021 campaign (P=.02), in which a greater number of professionals with a non-stable contract (P<.001) and lower mean age (P=.03) were also vaccinated. There were multiple statistical differences when comparing the reasons for accepting or refusing the vaccine, with more people being more likely to be vaccinated during the pandemic if there was a favourable atmosphere in the work or family environment (P<.001).

Conclusions

Health professionals áttitude towards influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic showed better results than the previous campaign, with a higher number of professionals vaccinated and a better perception of immunisation. Differences were also found between the campaigns and socio-demographic variables (sex, age, and type of employment contract).

查看原文本刊更多论文

2019冠状病毒病大流行后卫生保健专业人员对流感疫苗接种态度的变化

目的分析2019冠状病毒病（COVID-19）大流行前和期间卫生专业人员对流感疫苗接种的态度，并确定两者之间以及在社会人口统计学和职业变量方面的差异。方法采用横断面描述性研究，比较2017-2018年和2020-2021年流感疫苗接种活动的结果。收集社会人口学、职业和疫苗接种相关变量。进行了描述性和双变量分析，以及二元逻辑回归模型。结果共有973名卫生专业人员参与调查，平均年龄为41,13岁（标准差为11,16），显示2020-2021年流感季疫苗接种率较高（OR = 1,04; IC = 95% 1,03-1,05; p < 001）。在2020-2021年的运动中，接种疫苗的男性比例更高（P=.02），其中更多具有非稳定合同（P=. 001）和较低平均年龄（P=.03）的专业人员也接种了疫苗。在比较接受或拒绝接种疫苗的原因时，存在多种统计差异，如果在工作或家庭环境中有良好的氛围，更多人更有可能在大流行期间接种疫苗（P<.001）。结论卫生专业人员áttitude在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间对流感疫苗接种的态度较前一次运动取得了更好的效果，接种疫苗的专业人员数量增加，对免疫接种的认识也有所提高。在运动和社会人口变量（性别、年龄和雇佣合同类型）之间也发现了差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Enfermeria Clinica NURSING-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.