Enfoques metodológicos para la planificación de la ratio enfermera/paciente en los sistemas de salud: qué sabemos y qué necesitamos saber

IF 1.1 Q4 NURSING
Ana María Porcel-Gálvez , José Miguel Morales-Asencio
{"title":"Enfoques metodológicos para la planificación de la ratio enfermera/paciente en los sistemas de salud: qué sabemos y qué necesitamos saber","authors":"Ana María Porcel-Gálvez ,&nbsp;José Miguel Morales-Asencio","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2025.502305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The nurse-to-patient ratio planning presents a global challenge in healthcare systems, with significant disparities across countries. It is a widely studied phenomenon, yet methodological and conceptual gaps persist. In Spain, the nurse-to-1,000-inhabitant ratio (6.2) remains below the OECD average (8.8), resulting in an estimated shortage of 100,000 nurses. This issue is exacerbated by political decisions influenced by economic, cultural, and organisational factors.</div><div>This work aims to review existing methodological approaches for determining nurse staffing levels, identifying their strengths, limitations, and potential improvements to ensure the efficient and safe allocation of resources.</div><div>Five methodological approaches are analysed: expert judgement, distribution-based methods, time measurement, correlation between staffing levels and adverse events, and stratification by patient complexity. National and international data are compared, and their impact on safety, efficiency, and costs is assessed.</div><div>The study confirms that higher nurse staffing levels reduce mortality and adverse events. Models based on patient complexity, such as INICIARE, provide a more precise and adaptable approach.</div><div>In conclusion, nurse staffing planning should be based on a model that stratifies patient complexity levels according to care dependency while minimising institutional variability. It should be linked to clinical outcomes, patient safety, staff competencies, and workforce stability. Additionally, research should extend to primary and social care settings, where evidence remains limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":"35 5","pages":"Article 502305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862125001172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nurse-to-patient ratio planning presents a global challenge in healthcare systems, with significant disparities across countries. It is a widely studied phenomenon, yet methodological and conceptual gaps persist. In Spain, the nurse-to-1,000-inhabitant ratio (6.2) remains below the OECD average (8.8), resulting in an estimated shortage of 100,000 nurses. This issue is exacerbated by political decisions influenced by economic, cultural, and organisational factors.
This work aims to review existing methodological approaches for determining nurse staffing levels, identifying their strengths, limitations, and potential improvements to ensure the efficient and safe allocation of resources.
Five methodological approaches are analysed: expert judgement, distribution-based methods, time measurement, correlation between staffing levels and adverse events, and stratification by patient complexity. National and international data are compared, and their impact on safety, efficiency, and costs is assessed.
The study confirms that higher nurse staffing levels reduce mortality and adverse events. Models based on patient complexity, such as INICIARE, provide a more precise and adaptable approach.
In conclusion, nurse staffing planning should be based on a model that stratifies patient complexity levels according to care dependency while minimising institutional variability. It should be linked to clinical outcomes, patient safety, staff competencies, and workforce stability. Additionally, research should extend to primary and social care settings, where evidence remains limited.
规划卫生系统中护士/病人比率的方法:我们知道什么,我们需要知道什么
护士与患者比例规划是医疗保健系统中的一项全球性挑战,各国之间存在显著差异。这是一个被广泛研究的现象,但方法和概念上的差距仍然存在。在西班牙,护士与1000名居民的比率(6.2)仍然低于经合组织的平均水平(8.8),导致估计短缺10万名护士。受经济、文化和组织因素影响的政治决策加剧了这一问题。这项工作旨在回顾现有的方法方法,以确定护士人员配备水平,确定其优势,局限性和潜在的改进,以确保资源的有效和安全分配。分析了五种方法学方法:专家判断,基于分布的方法,时间测量,人员配备水平与不良事件之间的相关性,以及患者复杂性分层。比较国内和国际数据,并评估其对安全性、效率和成本的影响。研究证实,较高的护士配备水平可以降低死亡率和不良事件。基于患者复杂性的模型,如INICIARE,提供了一种更精确和适应性更强的方法。总之,护士人员配置规划应基于一个模型,该模型根据护理依赖程度对患者的复杂程度进行分层,同时最大限度地减少制度差异。它应与临床结果、患者安全、工作人员能力和劳动力稳定性联系起来。此外,研究应扩展到初级和社会保健环境,这方面的证据仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信