A comprehensive analysis of autoencoder variants for identification of multivariate geochemical anomalies linked to hydrothermal copper mineralization in Feizabad district, NE Iran

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Seyyed Ataollah Agha Seyyed Mirzabozorg , Mobin Saremi , Shirin Rasouli Pirouzian , Ramin DehghanNiri , Maysam Abedi
{"title":"A comprehensive analysis of autoencoder variants for identification of multivariate geochemical anomalies linked to hydrothermal copper mineralization in Feizabad district, NE Iran","authors":"Seyyed Ataollah Agha Seyyed Mirzabozorg ,&nbsp;Mobin Saremi ,&nbsp;Shirin Rasouli Pirouzian ,&nbsp;Ramin DehghanNiri ,&nbsp;Maysam Abedi","doi":"10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2025.105854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geochemical anomaly detection plays a pivotal role in mineral exploration at various scales. This process necessitates the integration of a conceptual model of mineral deposit type sought, alongside the utilization of data-driven methodologies to identify subtle anomalies within intricate multivariate geochemical datasets. Autoencoders (AEs), as unsupervised neural networks and reconstruction based anomaly detection algorithms, are suitable for this purpose. Several different AE variants can be used for geochemical anomaly detection, that each can potentially lead to the recognition of different anomalous patterns, complicating the selection of a singular best variant. In the present work, we implement and evaluate four AE variants, i.e., AE, sparse AE (SAE), variational AE (VAE), and convolutional AE (CAE), to compare their effectiveness in detecting geochemical anomalies in the Feizabad region, NE Iran. Our analysis, based on prediction-area (P-A) plots, indicates that the AE outperforms the others with a normalized density index score of 2.85, while SAE, VAE, and CAE scored 2.57. Interestingly, although VAE scored lower than AE, it provided more accurate and meaningful spatial zoning than its peers, even surpassing CAE, which is specifically designed to capture spatial patterns. These findings highlight that an improved model does not necessarily ensure superior perfoemance, highlighting the critical nature of comparative analysis in this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 105854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X25003218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geochemical anomaly detection plays a pivotal role in mineral exploration at various scales. This process necessitates the integration of a conceptual model of mineral deposit type sought, alongside the utilization of data-driven methodologies to identify subtle anomalies within intricate multivariate geochemical datasets. Autoencoders (AEs), as unsupervised neural networks and reconstruction based anomaly detection algorithms, are suitable for this purpose. Several different AE variants can be used for geochemical anomaly detection, that each can potentially lead to the recognition of different anomalous patterns, complicating the selection of a singular best variant. In the present work, we implement and evaluate four AE variants, i.e., AE, sparse AE (SAE), variational AE (VAE), and convolutional AE (CAE), to compare their effectiveness in detecting geochemical anomalies in the Feizabad region, NE Iran. Our analysis, based on prediction-area (P-A) plots, indicates that the AE outperforms the others with a normalized density index score of 2.85, while SAE, VAE, and CAE scored 2.57. Interestingly, although VAE scored lower than AE, it provided more accurate and meaningful spatial zoning than its peers, even surpassing CAE, which is specifically designed to capture spatial patterns. These findings highlight that an improved model does not necessarily ensure superior perfoemance, highlighting the critical nature of comparative analysis in this field.
伊朗东北部Feizabad地区热液铜矿化多变量地球化学异常识别的自编码器变量综合分析
地球化学异常检测在各种尺度的矿产勘查中起着举足轻重的作用。这一过程需要整合所寻找的矿床类型的概念模型,同时利用数据驱动的方法在复杂的多变量地球化学数据集中识别细微的异常。自编码器(ae)作为一种无监督神经网络和基于重构的异常检测算法,适合于这一目的。几种不同的声发射变体可用于地球化学异常检测,每种变体都可能导致识别不同的异常模式,从而使单一最佳变体的选择复杂化。本文采用AE、稀疏AE (SAE)、变分AE (VAE)和卷积AE (CAE)四种AE变体,并对其在伊朗东北部Feizabad地区的地球化学异常检测中的有效性进行了比较。基于预测面积(P-A)图的分析表明,AE的归一化密度指数得分为2.85,而SAE、VAE和CAE的归一化密度指数得分为2.57。有趣的是,尽管VAE得分低于AE,但它提供的空间分区比同类工具更准确、更有意义,甚至超过了专门用于捕捉空间格局的CAE。这些发现突出表明,改进的模型并不一定确保优越的性能,突出了比较分析在这一领域的关键性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of African Earth Sciences
Journal of African Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
240
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of African Earth Sciences sees itself as the prime geological journal for all aspects of the Earth Sciences about the African plate. Papers dealing with peripheral areas are welcome if they demonstrate a tight link with Africa. The Journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed scientific papers. It is devoted primarily to research papers but short communications relating to new developments of broad interest, reviews and book reviews will also be considered. Papers must have international appeal and should present work of more regional than local significance and dealing with well identified and justified scientific questions. Specialised technical papers, analytical or exploration reports must be avoided. Papers on applied geology should preferably be linked to such core disciplines and must be addressed to a more general geoscientific audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信