Human‒machine interaction based on real-time explainable deep learning for higher accurate grading of carotid stenosis from transverse B-mode scan videos
IF 3.3 3区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jia Liu , Xinrui Zhou , Hui Lin , Yuhao Huang , Jian Zheng , Erjiao Xu , Hongye Li , Min Zhong , Xin Yang , Xindi Hu , Xue Lu , Dong Ni , Jie Ren
{"title":"Human‒machine interaction based on real-time explainable deep learning for higher accurate grading of carotid stenosis from transverse B-mode scan videos","authors":"Jia Liu , Xinrui Zhou , Hui Lin , Yuhao Huang , Jian Zheng , Erjiao Xu , Hongye Li , Min Zhong , Xin Yang , Xindi Hu , Xue Lu , Dong Ni , Jie Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aim to develop an explainable deep learning (DL) model to assist radiologists in carotid stenosis classification by providing understandable or explainable output.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This prospective study included patients suspected ≥50 % carotid stenosis from three hospitals between February 2022 and October 2022. The DL model CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 was trained based on carotid transverse ultrasound (US) videos. Model performance was evaluated using expert (with 15 years of experience in carotid US evaluation) diagnoses as the reference standard. Finally, CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 was integrated into a user-friendly web graphical user interface to support artificial intelligence (AI) explainability and human supervision. The human‒machine interaction strategy was evaluated with five senior and five junior radiologists. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 311 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 71.3 years ± 8.3; 247 men) were included. CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 showed robust performance in carotid stenosis classification and approached that of senior radiologists (<em>P</em> > 0.05 for all comparisons). Junior and senior radiologists initially disagreed with AI on 47 and 37 plaques, respectively. Using the human‒machine interaction, they adopted AI diagnoses for 38 and 28 plaques, overruling 9 each. The AUROCs of human‒machine interaction achieved 0.868–0.896 and 0.875–0.904 for junior and senior radiologists respectively, substantially outperforming junior radiologists alone (<em>P</em> < 0.05 for all comparisons).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 attempted to explain to radiologists the information the DL model used to make decisions and proactively involved them in the decision loop to further improve their performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 112441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25005273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
We aim to develop an explainable deep learning (DL) model to assist radiologists in carotid stenosis classification by providing understandable or explainable output.
Materials and methods
This prospective study included patients suspected ≥50 % carotid stenosis from three hospitals between February 2022 and October 2022. The DL model CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 was trained based on carotid transverse ultrasound (US) videos. Model performance was evaluated using expert (with 15 years of experience in carotid US evaluation) diagnoses as the reference standard. Finally, CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 was integrated into a user-friendly web graphical user interface to support artificial intelligence (AI) explainability and human supervision. The human‒machine interaction strategy was evaluated with five senior and five junior radiologists. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated.
Results
A total of 311 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 71.3 years ± 8.3; 247 men) were included. CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 showed robust performance in carotid stenosis classification and approached that of senior radiologists (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Junior and senior radiologists initially disagreed with AI on 47 and 37 plaques, respectively. Using the human‒machine interaction, they adopted AI diagnoses for 38 and 28 plaques, overruling 9 each. The AUROCs of human‒machine interaction achieved 0.868–0.896 and 0.875–0.904 for junior and senior radiologists respectively, substantially outperforming junior radiologists alone (P < 0.05 for all comparisons).
Conclusion
CaroNet-Dynamic 2.0 attempted to explain to radiologists the information the DL model used to make decisions and proactively involved them in the decision loop to further improve their performance.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.