Combining established methods for value chain and power analyses: Towards a comprehensive next-generation understanding of value chain governance

IF 1.9 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103637
Kendisha Soekardjo Hintz , La Thi Tham , Felister Mombo , Eckhard Auch , Jürgen Pretzsch , Lukas Giessen
{"title":"Combining established methods for value chain and power analyses: Towards a comprehensive next-generation understanding of value chain governance","authors":"Kendisha Soekardjo Hintz ,&nbsp;La Thi Tham ,&nbsp;Felister Mombo ,&nbsp;Eckhard Auch ,&nbsp;Jürgen Pretzsch ,&nbsp;Lukas Giessen","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2025.103637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methods to analyze power in value chain governance often focus on multinational firms, which may not apply well to natural resource-based chains in domestic markets. Value chain analyses imply the complexity and power imbalances among the (in)direct actors in a value chain. However, quantifying the added value alone cannot fully capture the nuances of power among value chain actors. To cover the methodological gap, we propose complementing value chain analysis with actor-centered power and institutional power frameworks. The appropriation of profit and labor is framed as the key issue area to ensure coherence. Besides mapping the value chain and calculating the added value per value chain actor, the value network is mapped, and the power capabilities of the actors are quantified. The expected output identifies actors’ power in monetary and non-monetary terms, revealing how they utilize (in)formal institutional settings to their (dis)advantage. This multistage mixed-methods methodology permits the derivation of recommendations on how to achieve a more equitable value chain.<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The methodology consists of three stages: value chain analysis, actor-centered power and institutional power analyses, and synthesis</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The appropriation of profit and labor are the common issue area in both approaches</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The paper provides a step-by-step protocol for researchers to collect data</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 103637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125004819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methods to analyze power in value chain governance often focus on multinational firms, which may not apply well to natural resource-based chains in domestic markets. Value chain analyses imply the complexity and power imbalances among the (in)direct actors in a value chain. However, quantifying the added value alone cannot fully capture the nuances of power among value chain actors. To cover the methodological gap, we propose complementing value chain analysis with actor-centered power and institutional power frameworks. The appropriation of profit and labor is framed as the key issue area to ensure coherence. Besides mapping the value chain and calculating the added value per value chain actor, the value network is mapped, and the power capabilities of the actors are quantified. The expected output identifies actors’ power in monetary and non-monetary terms, revealing how they utilize (in)formal institutional settings to their (dis)advantage. This multistage mixed-methods methodology permits the derivation of recommendations on how to achieve a more equitable value chain.
  • The methodology consists of three stages: value chain analysis, actor-centered power and institutional power analyses, and synthesis
  • The appropriation of profit and labor are the common issue area in both approaches
  • The paper provides a step-by-step protocol for researchers to collect data

Abstract Image

结合价值链和权力分析的既定方法:迈向对价值链治理的全面的下一代理解
分析价值链治理中的权力的方法通常集中在跨国公司,这可能不适用于国内市场的基于自然资源的链。价值链分析暗示了价值链中直接参与者之间的复杂性和权力不平衡。然而,单独量化附加值并不能完全捕捉价值链参与者之间权力的细微差别。为了弥补方法论上的差距,我们建议用以行为者为中心的权力和制度权力框架来补充价值链分析。利润和劳动力的分配被设定为关键问题领域,以确保一致性。除了映射价值链和计算每个价值链参与者的附加价值外,还映射了价值网络,并量化了参与者的权力能力。预期产出确定了行为者在货币和非货币方面的权力,揭示了他们如何利用(在)正式制度环境中获得(不利)利益。这种多阶段混合方法方法允许就如何实现更公平的价值链提出建议。•该方法包括三个阶段:价值链分析,以行为者为中心的权力和制度权力分析,以及综合•利润和劳动力的占用是两种方法的共同问题领域•本文为研究人员提供了一个循序渐进的协议来收集数据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信