Who chooses consumer-directed personal care? Characterizing users and switchers under New York Medicaid.

IF 2.7
Julia G Burgdorf, David Russell, Jennifer M Reckrey
{"title":"Who chooses consumer-directed personal care? Characterizing users and switchers under New York Medicaid.","authors":"Julia G Burgdorf, David Russell, Jennifer M Reckrey","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medicaid-funded personal care can be managed by an agency (agency-directed) or by the enrollee/their representative (consumer-directed). Despite its dramatic growth in New York, little is known about who chooses consumer-directed care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared characteristics of agency- vs consumer-directed care users and predicted likelihood of switching personal care source (from agency- to consumer-directed care or vice versa) using clinical assessment and claims data for 15 395 older, dually enrolled members of a large Managed Long-Term Care (MLTC) plan between 2018 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consumer-directed care users were younger and had more family support, with less functional and clinical care needs but greater cognitive impairment. Greater cognitive impairment, greater family caregiver availability, and attending college were significantly associated with switching to consumer-directed care, while fewer hours/week of personal care services predicted any switch in care model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings reveal differences in who uses consumer-directed vs agency-directed care and highlight the importance of cognitive, sociodemographic, and social/family contextual factors in influencing enrollees' choice to switch to consumer-directed care. Policies should ensure ongoing access to consumer-directed care for the diverse Medicaid enrollees who rely on this care model.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medicaid-funded personal care can be managed by an agency (agency-directed) or by the enrollee/their representative (consumer-directed). Despite its dramatic growth in New York, little is known about who chooses consumer-directed care.

Methods: We compared characteristics of agency- vs consumer-directed care users and predicted likelihood of switching personal care source (from agency- to consumer-directed care or vice versa) using clinical assessment and claims data for 15 395 older, dually enrolled members of a large Managed Long-Term Care (MLTC) plan between 2018 and 2023.

Results: Consumer-directed care users were younger and had more family support, with less functional and clinical care needs but greater cognitive impairment. Greater cognitive impairment, greater family caregiver availability, and attending college were significantly associated with switching to consumer-directed care, while fewer hours/week of personal care services predicted any switch in care model.

Conclusion: Findings reveal differences in who uses consumer-directed vs agency-directed care and highlight the importance of cognitive, sociodemographic, and social/family contextual factors in influencing enrollees' choice to switch to consumer-directed care. Policies should ensure ongoing access to consumer-directed care for the diverse Medicaid enrollees who rely on this care model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

谁选择以消费者为导向的个人护理?纽约医疗补助计划下的使用者和转换者的特征。
简介:医疗补助资助的个人护理可以由机构(机构指导)或由登记者/他们的代表(消费者指导)管理。尽管它在纽约迅速增长,但很少有人知道是谁选择了以消费者为导向的医疗服务。方法:我们比较了机构和消费者导向的护理用户的特征,并使用2018年至2023年期间大型管理长期护理(MLTC)计划的15395名老年双登记成员的临床评估和索赔数据,预测了个人护理来源转换的可能性(从机构到消费者导向的护理或反之亦然)。结果:以消费者为导向的护理使用者更年轻,有更多的家庭支持,功能和临床护理需求较少,但认知障碍更大。更严重的认知障碍、更多的家庭照顾者的可用性和上大学与转向消费者导向的护理显著相关,而更少的个人护理服务时间/周预示着护理模式的任何转变。结论:研究结果揭示了使用消费者导向与机构导向护理的人的差异,并强调了认知、社会人口统计学和社会/家庭背景因素在影响登登者转向消费者导向护理的选择中的重要性。政策应该确保依靠这种医疗模式的不同的医疗补助计划参保者持续获得消费者导向的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信