Assessing the digital health maturity of general practice in Australia: results from a cross-sectional national survey.

IF 1.3
Tim Blake, Debbie Passey, Joanne Lee, Farwa Rizvi
{"title":"Assessing the digital health maturity of general practice in Australia: results from a cross-sectional national survey.","authors":"Tim Blake, Debbie Passey, Joanne Lee, Farwa Rizvi","doi":"10.1071/PY25107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Australia's health system combines federal and state roles, with Primary Health Networks supporting primary care. Digital health infrastructure exists, but meaningful use and maturity are limited across general practices. Methods Digital health maturity was assessed across six domains: infrastructure, meaningful use, readiness, digital literacy, data literacy, and clinical leadership using a cross-sectional survey design. Between August 2020 and July 2024, 1164 general practices from 10 PHN regions were surveyed out of the 2255 practices invited to respond (31.3% of general practice clinics in Australia), this represented a 51.6% response rate. Results On average, none of the general practice clinics scored above 80 out of 100 in any of the digital health maturity domains, suggesting a trend towards lower maturity. We found that low overall digital health maturity in practices is related to lower scores in meaningful use, digital health and data literacy, and clinical leadership domains. Discussion Digital health infrastructure alone is not enough. Targeted support is essential for digital adoption. Enhancing digital health and data literacy, leadership, and tailored change management can strengthen digital adoption in practices, potentially improving care quality and digital transformation nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY25107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Australia's health system combines federal and state roles, with Primary Health Networks supporting primary care. Digital health infrastructure exists, but meaningful use and maturity are limited across general practices. Methods Digital health maturity was assessed across six domains: infrastructure, meaningful use, readiness, digital literacy, data literacy, and clinical leadership using a cross-sectional survey design. Between August 2020 and July 2024, 1164 general practices from 10 PHN regions were surveyed out of the 2255 practices invited to respond (31.3% of general practice clinics in Australia), this represented a 51.6% response rate. Results On average, none of the general practice clinics scored above 80 out of 100 in any of the digital health maturity domains, suggesting a trend towards lower maturity. We found that low overall digital health maturity in practices is related to lower scores in meaningful use, digital health and data literacy, and clinical leadership domains. Discussion Digital health infrastructure alone is not enough. Targeted support is essential for digital adoption. Enhancing digital health and data literacy, leadership, and tailored change management can strengthen digital adoption in practices, potentially improving care quality and digital transformation nationally.

评估澳大利亚全科医疗的数字健康成熟度:一项横断面全国调查的结果。
澳大利亚的卫生系统结合了联邦和州的作用,初级卫生网络支持初级保健。数字卫生基础设施已经存在,但在一般实践中有意义的使用和成熟度有限。方法采用横断面调查设计,从六个领域评估数字健康成熟度:基础设施、有意义的使用、准备程度、数字素养、数据素养和临床领导。在2020年8月至2024年7月期间,来自10个PHN地区的1164家全科诊所接受了调查,其中2255家诊所受邀回应(占澳大利亚全科诊所的31.3%),这代表51.6%的回复率。结果平均而言,没有一家全科诊所在任何数字健康成熟度领域的得分超过80分(满分为100分),这表明成熟度有降低的趋势。我们发现,实践中整体数字健康成熟度较低与有意义使用、数字健康和数据素养以及临床领导领域得分较低有关。仅靠数字卫生基础设施是不够的。有针对性的支持对数字化采用至关重要。加强数字卫生和数据素养、领导力和量身定制的变革管理可以加强实践中的数字采用,从而有可能提高全国的护理质量和数字化转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信