Diagnostic Accuracy of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin in Peritoneal Effluent and Ascitic Fluid for Early Detection of Peritonitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.4 Q1 Medicine
Manuel Luis Prieto-Magallanes, José David González-Barajas, Violeta Aidee Camarena-Arteaga, Bladimir Díaz-Villavicencio, Juan Alberto Gómez-Fregoso, Ana María López-Yáñez, Ruth Rodríguez-Montaño, Judith Carolina De Arcos-Jiménez, Jaime Briseno-Ramírez
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin in Peritoneal Effluent and Ascitic Fluid for Early Detection of Peritonitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Manuel Luis Prieto-Magallanes, José David González-Barajas, Violeta Aidee Camarena-Arteaga, Bladimir Díaz-Villavicencio, Juan Alberto Gómez-Fregoso, Ana María López-Yáñez, Ruth Rodríguez-Montaño, Judith Carolina De Arcos-Jiménez, Jaime Briseno-Ramírez","doi":"10.3390/medsci13030175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis and cirrhosis remains common and leads to morbidity. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been evaluated as a rapid adjunctive biomarker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-DTA and PROSPERO registration (CRD420251105563), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2024, and ran an update on 30 June 2025 (no additional eligible studies). Diagnostic accuracy studies measuring NGAL in peritoneal/ascitic fluid against guideline reference standards were included. When 2 × 2 data were not reported, we reconstructed cell counts from published metrics using a prespecified, tolerance-bounded algorithm (two studies). Accuracy was synthesized with a bivariate random effects (Reitsma) model; 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were used to express heterogeneity; small-study effects were assessed by Deeks' test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included qualitatively and ten were entered into a meta-analysis (573 cases; 833 controls). The pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97) and specificity was 0.86 (0.70-0.94); likelihood ratios were LR+ ≈7.0 and LR- 0.06. Between-study variability was concentrated on specificity: the PI for a new setting was 0.75-0.98 for sensitivity and 0.23-0.99 for specificity. Deeks' test showed evidence of small-study effects in the primary analysis; assay/platform and thresholding contributed materially to heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NGAL in peritoneal/ascitic fluid demonstrates high pooled sensitivity but variable specificity across settings. Given the wide prediction intervals and the signal for small-study effects, NGAL should be interpreted as an adjunct to guideline-based criteria-not as a stand-alone rule-out test. Standardization of pre-analytics and assay-specific, locally verified thresholds, together with prospective multicenter validations and impact/economic evaluations, are needed to define its clinical role.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis and cirrhosis remains common and leads to morbidity. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been evaluated as a rapid adjunctive biomarker.

Methods: Following PRISMA-DTA and PROSPERO registration (CRD420251105563), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2024, and ran an update on 30 June 2025 (no additional eligible studies). Diagnostic accuracy studies measuring NGAL in peritoneal/ascitic fluid against guideline reference standards were included. When 2 × 2 data were not reported, we reconstructed cell counts from published metrics using a prespecified, tolerance-bounded algorithm (two studies). Accuracy was synthesized with a bivariate random effects (Reitsma) model; 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were used to express heterogeneity; small-study effects were assessed by Deeks' test.

Results: Thirteen studies were included qualitatively and ten were entered into a meta-analysis (573 cases; 833 controls). The pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97) and specificity was 0.86 (0.70-0.94); likelihood ratios were LR+ ≈7.0 and LR- 0.06. Between-study variability was concentrated on specificity: the PI for a new setting was 0.75-0.98 for sensitivity and 0.23-0.99 for specificity. Deeks' test showed evidence of small-study effects in the primary analysis; assay/platform and thresholding contributed materially to heterogeneity.

Conclusions: NGAL in peritoneal/ascitic fluid demonstrates high pooled sensitivity but variable specificity across settings. Given the wide prediction intervals and the signal for small-study effects, NGAL should be interpreted as an adjunct to guideline-based criteria-not as a stand-alone rule-out test. Standardization of pre-analytics and assay-specific, locally verified thresholds, together with prospective multicenter validations and impact/economic evaluations, are needed to define its clinical role.

腹膜流出液和腹水中中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂钙蛋白诊断腹膜炎的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:腹膜透析和肝硬化的腹膜炎仍然很常见,并导致发病率。中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂钙蛋白(NGAL)已被评估为一种快速辅助生物标志物。方法:在PRISMA-DTA和PROSPERO注册(CRD420251105563)后,我们检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、LILACS、Scopus和Web of Science从成立到2024年12月31日,并在2025年6月30日进行更新(没有其他符合条件的研究)。根据指南参考标准测量腹膜/腹水中NGAL的诊断准确性研究被纳入。当未报告2 × 2数据时,我们使用预先指定的公差有限算法从已发表的指标中重建细胞计数(两项研究)。采用双变量随机效应(Reitsma)模型综合精度;95%预测区间(pi)表示异质性;小规模研究的效果通过Deeks测试进行评估。结果:13项定性研究纳入,10项纳入meta分析(573例,对照833例)。合并敏感性为0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97),特异性为0.86 (0.70-0.94);似然比为LR+≈7.0和LR- 0.06。研究间变异性集中在特异性上:新设置的PI敏感性为0.75-0.98,特异性为0.23-0.99。Deeks的检验在初步分析中显示了小研究效应的证据;分析/平台和阈值是造成异质性的主要原因。结论:NGAL在腹膜/腹水中显示出高的综合敏感性,但不同情况下的特异性不同。考虑到较宽的预测间隔和小研究效应的信号,NGAL应该被解释为基于指南的标准的辅助,而不是作为一个独立的排除测试。为了确定其临床作用,需要对分析前和分析特异性、当地验证的阈值进行标准化,以及前瞻性的多中心验证和影响/经济评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信