Guidelines for the Creation of Accessible Consent Materials and Procedures: Lessons from Research with Autistic People and People with Intellectual Disability.

Kelly B Beck, Kristen T MacKenziem, Anne V Kirby, Katherine McDonald, Ian Moura, Kaitlyn Breitenfeldt, Elizabeth Rutenberg, Tanvi Kumar, Juliet Mancino, Maya Sabatello, Shannon Roth, Christina Nicolaidis
{"title":"Guidelines for the Creation of Accessible Consent Materials and Procedures: Lessons from Research with Autistic People and People with Intellectual Disability.","authors":"Kelly B Beck, Kristen T MacKenziem, Anne V Kirby, Katherine McDonald, Ian Moura, Kaitlyn Breitenfeldt, Elizabeth Rutenberg, Tanvi Kumar, Juliet Mancino, Maya Sabatello, Shannon Roth, Christina Nicolaidis","doi":"10.1089/aut.2024.0263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informed, voluntary, ongoing consent is a central tenet of ethical research. However, consent processes are prone to exclusionary practices and inaccessibility. Consent materials are often too long and complex to foster understanding and ensure that people make truly informed decisions to participate in research. While this complexity is problematic for all people, these challenges are compounded for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Consent materials and procedures rarely incorporate accommodations for processing and communication differences common in autism and intellectual disability. Failure to provide such accommodations ultimately threatens the conduct of ethical research. We describe lessons learned across multiple major U.S. research institutions that improved informed consent materials and procedures, with the goal of fostering responsible inclusion in research for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. We used these alternative materials and procedures in multiple research projects with samples of autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Each contributing team partnered with university human research participant protections personnel, accessibility experts, community members, and researchers to develop rigorous procedures for improving the readability and accessibility of informed consent materials. We present guidelines for designing consent materials and procedures and assert that participatory methods are vital to the success of ongoing accessibility initiatives. Adoption of understandable consent materials and accessible consent procedures can cultivate more equitable, respectful, and inclusive human research practices. Future work should expand on this work to design inclusive practices for populations with additional considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informed, voluntary, ongoing consent is a central tenet of ethical research. However, consent processes are prone to exclusionary practices and inaccessibility. Consent materials are often too long and complex to foster understanding and ensure that people make truly informed decisions to participate in research. While this complexity is problematic for all people, these challenges are compounded for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Consent materials and procedures rarely incorporate accommodations for processing and communication differences common in autism and intellectual disability. Failure to provide such accommodations ultimately threatens the conduct of ethical research. We describe lessons learned across multiple major U.S. research institutions that improved informed consent materials and procedures, with the goal of fostering responsible inclusion in research for autistic people and people with intellectual disability. We used these alternative materials and procedures in multiple research projects with samples of autistic people and people with intellectual disability. Each contributing team partnered with university human research participant protections personnel, accessibility experts, community members, and researchers to develop rigorous procedures for improving the readability and accessibility of informed consent materials. We present guidelines for designing consent materials and procedures and assert that participatory methods are vital to the success of ongoing accessibility initiatives. Adoption of understandable consent materials and accessible consent procedures can cultivate more equitable, respectful, and inclusive human research practices. Future work should expand on this work to design inclusive practices for populations with additional considerations.

创建无障碍同意材料和程序的指南:来自自闭症患者和智力残疾者研究的经验教训。
知情、自愿、持续的同意是伦理研究的核心原则。然而,同意过程容易出现排他性做法和不可访问性。同意材料往往太长太复杂,无法促进理解,也无法确保人们做出真正知情的决定来参与研究。虽然这种复杂性对所有人来说都是一个问题,但对于自闭症患者和智力残疾者来说,这些挑战更加复杂。同意材料和程序很少考虑到自闭症和智力残疾中常见的处理和沟通差异。如果不能提供这样的便利,最终会威胁到伦理研究的开展。我们描述了美国多个主要研究机构的经验教训,这些机构改进了知情同意材料和程序,目标是促进对自闭症患者和智障人士的研究负责任的包容。我们在多个研究项目中使用了这些替代材料和程序,其中包括自闭症患者和智障人士的样本。每个贡献团队都与大学人类研究参与者保护人员、无障碍专家、社区成员和研究人员合作,制定了严格的程序,以提高知情同意材料的可读性和可及性。我们提出了设计同意材料和程序的指导方针,并断言参与式方法对正在进行的无障碍倡议的成功至关重要。采用可理解的同意材料和可理解的同意程序可以培养更公平、尊重和包容的人类研究实践。今后的工作应在此基础上进行扩展,在考虑其他因素的情况下为人口设计包容性做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信