Total-Arterial Revascularization Is Superior in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction-A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
Christian Jörg Rustenbach, Julia Schano, Christoph Salewski, Helene Häberle, Kristian-Christos Ngamsri, Ilija Djordjevic, Stefanie Wendt, Tulio Caldonazo, Ibrahim Saqer, Shekhar Saha, Philipp Schnackenburg, Lina Maria Serna-Higuita, Torsten Doenst, Christian Hagl, Thorsten Wahlers, Christian Schlensak, Stefan Reichert
{"title":"Total-Arterial Revascularization Is Superior in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction-A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.","authors":"Christian Jörg Rustenbach, Julia Schano, Christoph Salewski, Helene Häberle, Kristian-Christos Ngamsri, Ilija Djordjevic, Stefanie Wendt, Tulio Caldonazo, Ibrahim Saqer, Shekhar Saha, Philipp Schnackenburg, Lina Maria Serna-Higuita, Torsten Doenst, Christian Hagl, Thorsten Wahlers, Christian Schlensak, Stefan Reichert","doi":"10.3390/medsci13030179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Total arterial revascularization (TAR) may improve outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively screened 574 adults with HFrEF (LVEF < 40%) undergoing isolated CABG across four German centers (2017-2023). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 240 patients were analyzed (120 TAR vs. 120 NTAR). The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACCE (death, MI, stroke). Key secondary endpoints included ICU/hospital length-of-stay, ventilation time, delirium, transfusion requirements, and acute kidney injury. <b>Results:</b> MACCE occurred in 4.1% (TAR) vs. 14.2% (NTAR) (<i>p</i> = 0.007). TAR was associated with shorter ICU stay (median 44.5 h vs. 90 h, <i>p</i> < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (10 d vs. 12 d, <i>p</i> = 0.002), reduced ventilation time (8 h vs. 12 h, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower delirium (5.0% vs. 14.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.016), and fewer RBC transfusions intra-operatively (0.13 ± 0.45 vs. 0.31 ± 0.58 units, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and during the entire stay (0.70 ± 1.33 vs. 1.77 ± 2.91 units, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> In this multicenter propensity-matched cohort, TAR was associated with lower in-hospital MACCE and more favorable perioperative outcomes compared with NTAR. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm causality and long-term benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Total arterial revascularization (TAR) may improve outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: We retrospectively screened 574 adults with HFrEF (LVEF < 40%) undergoing isolated CABG across four German centers (2017-2023). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 240 patients were analyzed (120 TAR vs. 120 NTAR). The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACCE (death, MI, stroke). Key secondary endpoints included ICU/hospital length-of-stay, ventilation time, delirium, transfusion requirements, and acute kidney injury. Results: MACCE occurred in 4.1% (TAR) vs. 14.2% (NTAR) (p = 0.007). TAR was associated with shorter ICU stay (median 44.5 h vs. 90 h, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (10 d vs. 12 d, p = 0.002), reduced ventilation time (8 h vs. 12 h, p < 0.001), lower delirium (5.0% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.016), and fewer RBC transfusions intra-operatively (0.13 ± 0.45 vs. 0.31 ± 0.58 units, p = 0.028) and during the entire stay (0.70 ± 1.33 vs. 1.77 ± 2.91 units, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this multicenter propensity-matched cohort, TAR was associated with lower in-hospital MACCE and more favorable perioperative outcomes compared with NTAR. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm causality and long-term benefits.