Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the family Chlorogomphidae (Odonata, Anisoptera).

IF 1.9 2区生物学 Q3 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY

Invertebrate Systematics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1071/IS25016

Thomas Schneider, Andy Vierstraete, Oleg E Kosterin, Dietmar Ikemeyer, Fang-Shuo Hu, Tom Kompier, Henri J Dumont

{"title":"Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the family Chlorogomphidae (Odonata, Anisoptera).","authors":"Thomas Schneider, Andy Vierstraete, Oleg E Kosterin, Dietmar Ikemeyer, Fang-Shuo Hu, Tom Kompier, Henri J Dumont","doi":"10.1071/IS25016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phylogenetic analysis of the family Chlorogomphidae was carried out using two nuclear markers, the ITS and histone H3-H4 regions, and a barcoding fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene, using sequences obtained in this study and adopted from GenBank. Their joint analysis was performed using StarBEAST software. In total, 36 (64%) of 56 species of all three genera currently recognised in this family were analysed. Our analysis showed Chlorogomphidae as a monotypic family containing the single speciose genus Chlorogomphus Selys, 1854. Chlorogomphus montanus Chao, 1999, syn. nov., is synonymised to Chlorogomphus nasutus Needham, 1930, Chlorogomphus urolobatus Chen, 1950, syn. nov., is synonymised to Chlorogomphus infuscatus Needham, 1930. The synonymy of Chlorogomphus suzukii Oguma, 1926 and Chlorogomphus tunti Needham, 1930 is confirmed. Some other potential synonyms are discussed. The phylogenetic trees reconstructed here showed that the species name C. nasutus Needham, 1930 actually refers to two (not three) different taxa. Thus, we suggest considering these two taxa as separate species, C. nasutus and C. satoi Asahina, 1995. ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5188C826-AD51-4605-8B06-3C63DE80F1F0.</p>","PeriodicalId":54927,"journal":{"name":"Invertebrate Systematics","volume":"39 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Invertebrate Systematics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IS25016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phylogenetic analysis of the family Chlorogomphidae was carried out using two nuclear markers, the ITS and histone H3-H4 regions, and a barcoding fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene, using sequences obtained in this study and adopted from GenBank. Their joint analysis was performed using StarBEAST software. In total, 36 (64%) of 56 species of all three genera currently recognised in this family were analysed. Our analysis showed Chlorogomphidae as a monotypic family containing the single speciose genus Chlorogomphus Selys, 1854. Chlorogomphus montanus Chao, 1999, syn. nov., is synonymised to Chlorogomphus nasutus Needham, 1930, Chlorogomphus urolobatus Chen, 1950, syn. nov., is synonymised to Chlorogomphus infuscatus Needham, 1930. The synonymy of Chlorogomphus suzukii Oguma, 1926 and Chlorogomphus tunti Needham, 1930 is confirmed. Some other potential synonyms are discussed. The phylogenetic trees reconstructed here showed that the species name C. nasutus Needham, 1930 actually refers to two (not three) different taxa. Thus, we suggest considering these two taxa as separate species, C. nasutus and C. satoi Asahina, 1995. ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5188C826-AD51-4605-8B06-3C63DE80F1F0.

查看原文本刊更多论文

文章标题异翅目飞蛾科分子系统发育分析。

利用ITS和组蛋白H3-H4区域两个核标记，以及线粒体COI基因的条形码片段，对Chlorogomphidae家族进行系统发育分析，使用本研究获得的序列并从GenBank中获取。他们的联合分析是使用StarBEAST软件进行的。共分析了该科所有3属56种中的36种（64%）。我们的分析表明，绿足科是一个单型科，包含单种属，1854。Chao, 1999, synnov .，与nasutus李约瑟，1930,Chlorogomphus urolobatus Chen, 1950, synnov .，与infuscatus李约瑟，1930，同义。确认了1926年的铃木小沼和1930年的东提尼达姆的同义。还讨论了其他一些可能的同义词。本文重建的系统发育树显示，C. nasutus Needham， 1930实际上指的是两个（而不是三个）不同的分类群。因此，我们建议将C. nasutus和C. satoi Asahina， 1995这两个分类群视为独立的种。ZooBank: urn: lsid zoobank.org:酒吧:5188 c826 - ad51 - 4605 - 8 b06 - 3 - c63de80f1f0。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Invertebrate Systematics 生物-动物学

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Invertebrate Systematics (formerly known as Invertebrate Taxonomy) is an international journal publishing original and significant contributions on the systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of all invertebrate taxa. Articles in the journal provide comprehensive treatments of clearly defined taxonomic groups, often emphasising their biodiversity patterns and/or biological aspects. The journal also includes contributions on the systematics of selected species that are of particular conservation, economic, medical or veterinary importance. Invertebrate Systematics is a vital resource globally for scientists, students, conservation biologists, environmental consultants and government policy advisors who are interested in terrestrial, freshwater and marine systems. Invertebrate Systematics is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.