{"title":"Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.","authors":"Anna Tsiakiri, Akyllina Despoti, Panagiota Koutsimani, Kalliopi Megari, Spyridon Plakias, Angeliki Tsapanou","doi":"10.3390/medsci13030191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive and neuropsychological effects of cancer and its treatments have gained increasing attention over the past decade, with growing evidence of persistent deficits across multiple cancer types. While numerous studies have examined these effects, the literature remains fragmented, and no comprehensive bibliometric synthesis has been conducted to map the field's intellectual structure and emerging trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric and science mapping analysis was performed using the Scopus database to identify peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 on neuropsychological or cognitive outcomes in adult cancer populations. Data from 179 eligible publications were analyzed with VOSviewer and Microsoft Power BI, applying performance metrics and network mapping techniques, including co-authorship, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Publication output increased steadily over the decade, with leading contributions from the Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Psycho-Oncology, and Brain Imaging and Behavior. Co-citation analysis identified three core intellectual pillars: (i) clinical characterization of cancer-related cognitive impairment, (ii) mechanistic and neuroimaging-based investigations, and (iii) neurosurgical and neuropathological research in brain tumors. Keyword mapping revealed emerging themes in sleep and circadian rhythm research, biological contributors to cognitive decline, and scalable rehabilitation strategies such as web-based cognitive training. Collaborative networks, while showing dense local clusters, remained moderately fragmented across disciplines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides the first quantitative, decade-spanning map of cognitive oncology research, highlighting both consolidated knowledge areas and underexplored domains. Future efforts should prioritize methodological standardization, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and integration of cognitive endpoints into survivorship care, with the ultimate aim of improving functional outcomes and quality of life for cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cognitive and neuropsychological effects of cancer and its treatments have gained increasing attention over the past decade, with growing evidence of persistent deficits across multiple cancer types. While numerous studies have examined these effects, the literature remains fragmented, and no comprehensive bibliometric synthesis has been conducted to map the field's intellectual structure and emerging trends.
Methods: A bibliometric and science mapping analysis was performed using the Scopus database to identify peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 on neuropsychological or cognitive outcomes in adult cancer populations. Data from 179 eligible publications were analyzed with VOSviewer and Microsoft Power BI, applying performance metrics and network mapping techniques, including co-authorship, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence analyses.
Results: Publication output increased steadily over the decade, with leading contributions from the Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Psycho-Oncology, and Brain Imaging and Behavior. Co-citation analysis identified three core intellectual pillars: (i) clinical characterization of cancer-related cognitive impairment, (ii) mechanistic and neuroimaging-based investigations, and (iii) neurosurgical and neuropathological research in brain tumors. Keyword mapping revealed emerging themes in sleep and circadian rhythm research, biological contributors to cognitive decline, and scalable rehabilitation strategies such as web-based cognitive training. Collaborative networks, while showing dense local clusters, remained moderately fragmented across disciplines.
Conclusions: This review provides the first quantitative, decade-spanning map of cognitive oncology research, highlighting both consolidated knowledge areas and underexplored domains. Future efforts should prioritize methodological standardization, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and integration of cognitive endpoints into survivorship care, with the ultimate aim of improving functional outcomes and quality of life for cancer survivors.
背景:在过去的十年中,癌症及其治疗的认知和神经心理影响越来越受到关注,越来越多的证据表明多种癌症类型的持续缺陷。虽然有许多研究考察了这些影响,但文献仍然是碎片化的,并且没有进行全面的文献计量综合来绘制该领域的知识结构和新兴趋势。方法:使用Scopus数据库进行文献计量学和科学图谱分析,以确定2015年至2025年间发表的关于成年癌症人群神经心理或认知结果的同行评审文章。使用VOSviewer和Microsoft Power BI对179份合格出版物的数据进行分析,应用性能指标和网络映射技术,包括合著、书目耦合、共被引和关键词共现分析。结果:在过去的十年中,论文的发表量稳步增长,主要来自《神经肿瘤学杂志》、《心理肿瘤学杂志》和《脑成像与行为》。共引分析确定了三个核心知识支柱:(i)癌症相关认知障碍的临床特征,(ii)基于机制和神经影像学的调查,以及(iii)脑肿瘤的神经外科和神经病理学研究。关键词映射揭示了睡眠和昼夜节律研究的新兴主题,认知能力下降的生物学因素,以及基于网络的认知训练等可扩展的康复策略。协作网络虽然显示出密集的局部集群,但在各个学科之间仍然保持适度的碎片化。结论:这篇综述提供了第一个定量的、跨越十年的认知肿瘤学研究图谱,突出了巩固的知识领域和未开发的领域。未来的工作应优先考虑方法标准化,跨学科合作,并将认知终点整合到幸存者护理中,最终目的是改善癌症幸存者的功能结局和生活质量。