Repeatability of diffusion and perfusion MRI derived radiomic features in glioblastoma: a test-retest study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Philip Martin, Lois Holloway, Peter Metcalfe, Eng-Siew Koh, Farhannah Aly, Edward Chan, Caterina Brighi
{"title":"Repeatability of diffusion and perfusion MRI derived radiomic features in glioblastoma: a test-retest study.","authors":"Philip Martin, Lois Holloway, Peter Metcalfe, Eng-Siew Koh, Farhannah Aly, Edward Chan, Caterina Brighi","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01613-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An understanding of the repeatability of imaging biomarkers is key to their implementation as clinical tools. In this study we calculate the repeatability and inter-correlation of radiomic features derived from quantitative MRI (qMRI) of Glioblastoma (GBM) patients and assess the effect of image standardisation methods on these factors. We analysed scan-rescan Diffusion Weighted MR Images (DWI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Images (DCE) from 36 GBM patients obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). These included 17 patients, from the QIN-GBM-Treatment-Response patient cohort, scanned post surgery and prior to chemo-radiation therapy and 19 patients, from the RIDER Neuro MRI patient cohort, scanned at diagnosis of tumour recurrence. For both patient cohorts, two sets of scans were taken 2-6 days apart. Each of these patient cohorts was analysed independently to determine if findings were consistent across different acquisition parameters. Parametric maps of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) were obtained from DWI and DCE data, respectively. Intensity normalisation and noise filtering were applied to the parametric maps in multiple permutations to give 7 distinct standardisation methods. Shape, first order and second order radiomic features for the parametric maps were calculated within the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated between the feature value at each imaging timepoint. The ICC of first and second order features derived from images with each standardisation method was compared to the ICC of corresponding features derived from images without standardisation. Based on the average ICC of features derived from ADC images without image standardisation, first order features were the most repeatable in both patient cohorts. For ADC derived features in the QIN cohort, shape features were the second most repeatable followed by second order features. For ADC derived features in the RIDER cohort, second order features were the second most repeatable followed by shape features. In CBV images, shape features were the most repeatable followed by second order and then first order in both patient cohorts. No image standardisation method implemented in this study was found to significantly increase the repeatability of ADC-derived first or second order features. For first order CBV features z-score normalisation without noise filtering produced a significant improvement in feature repeatability in both patient cohorts. Radiomic feature repeatability is impacted by feature class. Image standardisation methods implemented in this study were not found to be effective at improving the repeatability of ADC-derived features and had limited utility for improving CBV derived features. Future radiomic studies should consider feature repeatability as an important factor in feature selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01613-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An understanding of the repeatability of imaging biomarkers is key to their implementation as clinical tools. In this study we calculate the repeatability and inter-correlation of radiomic features derived from quantitative MRI (qMRI) of Glioblastoma (GBM) patients and assess the effect of image standardisation methods on these factors. We analysed scan-rescan Diffusion Weighted MR Images (DWI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Images (DCE) from 36 GBM patients obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). These included 17 patients, from the QIN-GBM-Treatment-Response patient cohort, scanned post surgery and prior to chemo-radiation therapy and 19 patients, from the RIDER Neuro MRI patient cohort, scanned at diagnosis of tumour recurrence. For both patient cohorts, two sets of scans were taken 2-6 days apart. Each of these patient cohorts was analysed independently to determine if findings were consistent across different acquisition parameters. Parametric maps of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) were obtained from DWI and DCE data, respectively. Intensity normalisation and noise filtering were applied to the parametric maps in multiple permutations to give 7 distinct standardisation methods. Shape, first order and second order radiomic features for the parametric maps were calculated within the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated between the feature value at each imaging timepoint. The ICC of first and second order features derived from images with each standardisation method was compared to the ICC of corresponding features derived from images without standardisation. Based on the average ICC of features derived from ADC images without image standardisation, first order features were the most repeatable in both patient cohorts. For ADC derived features in the QIN cohort, shape features were the second most repeatable followed by second order features. For ADC derived features in the RIDER cohort, second order features were the second most repeatable followed by shape features. In CBV images, shape features were the most repeatable followed by second order and then first order in both patient cohorts. No image standardisation method implemented in this study was found to significantly increase the repeatability of ADC-derived first or second order features. For first order CBV features z-score normalisation without noise filtering produced a significant improvement in feature repeatability in both patient cohorts. Radiomic feature repeatability is impacted by feature class. Image standardisation methods implemented in this study were not found to be effective at improving the repeatability of ADC-derived features and had limited utility for improving CBV derived features. Future radiomic studies should consider feature repeatability as an important factor in feature selection.

胶质母细胞瘤扩散和灌注MRI放射学特征的可重复性:一项测试-再测试研究。
了解成像生物标志物的可重复性是其作为临床工具实施的关键。在这项研究中,我们计算了胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者定量MRI (qMRI)放射学特征的可重复性和相互相关性,并评估了图像标准化方法对这些因素的影响。我们分析了来自癌症影像档案(TCIA)的36例GBM患者的扫描扫描弥散加权磁共振图像(DWI)和动态对比增强磁共振图像(DCE)。其中17例患者来自秦- gbm治疗反应组,在手术后和放化疗前进行扫描,19例患者来自RIDER神经MRI组,在诊断为肿瘤复发时进行扫描。对于两组患者,两组扫描间隔2-6天进行。每个患者队列都被独立分析,以确定不同获取参数的结果是否一致。DWI和DCE数据分别获得表观扩散系数(ADC)和脑血容量(CBV)参数图。将强度归一化和噪声滤波应用于多种排列的参数图,给出7种不同的标准化方法。在总体肿瘤体积(GTV)内计算参数图的形状,一阶和二阶放射特征。计算各成像时间点特征值之间的类内相关系数(Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)。将各标准化方法得到的一阶和二阶特征的ICC与未标准化图像得到的相应特征的ICC进行比较。基于未经图像标准化的ADC图像的特征的平均ICC,一阶特征在两个患者队列中是最可重复的。对于秦队列中ADC衍生的特征,形状特征是第二可重复的,其次是二阶特征。对于RIDER队列中ADC衍生的特征,二阶特征的可重复性次之,其次是形状特征。在CBV图像中,形状特征是最可重复的,其次是二阶,然后是一阶。本研究中没有发现任何图像标准化方法可以显著提高adc衍生的一阶或二阶特征的重复性。对于一阶CBV特征,无噪声滤波的z得分归一化在两个患者队列中显著改善了特征的可重复性。放射学特征的可重复性受到特征类的影响。本研究中实施的图像标准化方法不能有效提高adc衍生特征的可重复性,并且对改善CBV衍生特征的效用有限。未来放射学研究应将特征可重复性作为特征选择的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信