Development of a patient-specific cone-beam computed tomography dose optimization model using machine learning in image-guided radiation therapy.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shuta Miura
{"title":"Development of a patient-specific cone-beam computed tomography dose optimization model using machine learning in image-guided radiation therapy.","authors":"Shuta Miura","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00966-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly utilized in radiation therapy to visualize soft tissues and bone structures. This study aims to develop a machine learning model that predicts optimal, patient-specific CBCT doses that minimize radiation exposure while maintaining soft tissue image quality in prostate radiation therapy. Phantom studies evaluated the relationship between dose and two image quality metrics: image standard deviation (SD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In a prostate-simulating phantom, CNR did not significantly decrease at doses above 40% compared to the 100% dose. Based on low-contrast resolution, this value was selected as the minimum clinical dose level. In clinical image analysis, both SD and CNR degraded with decreasing dose, consistent with the phantom findings. The structural similarity index between CBCT and planning computed tomography (CT) significantly decreased at doses below 60%, with a mean value of 0.69 at 40%. Previous studies suggest that this level may correspond to acceptable registration accuracy within the typical planning target volume margins applied in image-guided radiotherapy. A machine learning model was developed to predict CBCT doses using patient-specific metrics from planning CT scans and CBCT image quality parameters. Among the tested models, support vector regression achieved the highest accuracy, with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.833 and a root mean squared error of 0.0876, and was therefore adopted for dose prediction. These results support the feasibility of patient-specific CBCT imaging protocols that reduce radiation dose while maintaining clinically acceptable image quality for soft tissue registration.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00966-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly utilized in radiation therapy to visualize soft tissues and bone structures. This study aims to develop a machine learning model that predicts optimal, patient-specific CBCT doses that minimize radiation exposure while maintaining soft tissue image quality in prostate radiation therapy. Phantom studies evaluated the relationship between dose and two image quality metrics: image standard deviation (SD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In a prostate-simulating phantom, CNR did not significantly decrease at doses above 40% compared to the 100% dose. Based on low-contrast resolution, this value was selected as the minimum clinical dose level. In clinical image analysis, both SD and CNR degraded with decreasing dose, consistent with the phantom findings. The structural similarity index between CBCT and planning computed tomography (CT) significantly decreased at doses below 60%, with a mean value of 0.69 at 40%. Previous studies suggest that this level may correspond to acceptable registration accuracy within the typical planning target volume margins applied in image-guided radiotherapy. A machine learning model was developed to predict CBCT doses using patient-specific metrics from planning CT scans and CBCT image quality parameters. Among the tested models, support vector regression achieved the highest accuracy, with an R2 value of 0.833 and a root mean squared error of 0.0876, and was therefore adopted for dose prediction. These results support the feasibility of patient-specific CBCT imaging protocols that reduce radiation dose while maintaining clinically acceptable image quality for soft tissue registration.

在图像引导放射治疗中使用机器学习的患者特异性锥束计算机断层扫描剂量优化模型的开发。
锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)通常用于放射治疗,以显示软组织和骨结构。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习模型,预测最佳的患者特异性CBCT剂量,以最大限度地减少辐射暴露,同时保持前列腺放射治疗中的软组织图像质量。幻影研究评估了剂量与两个图像质量指标之间的关系:图像标准偏差(SD)和对比噪声比(CNR)。在前列腺模拟幻影中,与100%剂量相比,CNR在剂量超过40%时没有显著降低。根据低对比分辨率,选择该值作为最低临床剂量水平。在临床图像分析中,SD和CNR均随剂量的降低而降低,与幻象的发现一致。当剂量低于60%时,CBCT与计划计算机断层扫描(CT)之间的结构相似指数显著下降,40%时平均值为0.69。先前的研究表明,在图像引导放射治疗中应用的典型规划靶体积边界内,该水平可能对应于可接受的配准精度。研究人员开发了一种机器学习模型,利用计划CT扫描和CBCT图像质量参数的患者特异性指标来预测CBCT剂量。在测试的模型中,支持向量回归的准确度最高,R2值为0.833,均方根误差为0.0876,可用于剂量预测。这些结果支持了患者特异性CBCT成像方案的可行性,该方案在降低辐射剂量的同时保持临床可接受的软组织配准图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信