Ancient Principles, Modern Impact: Increased Femoral Offset Demonstrates Decreased Load to Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
William F Sherman, Jackson P Tate, Nolan M Reinhart, Justin Kim, Andrew M Gabig, Arjun Verma, Akshar H Patel
{"title":"Ancient Principles, Modern Impact: Increased Femoral Offset Demonstrates Decreased Load to Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"William F Sherman, Jackson P Tate, Nolan M Reinhart, Justin Kim, Andrew M Gabig, Arjun Verma, Akshar H Patel","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A critical decision in total hip arthroplasty implant selection is the choice of femoral offset. Femoral offset lateralizes the femoral shaft, tensioning the abductor mechanism providing stability and reducing joint reactive forces. Variations in offset may affect hip biomechanics, potentially influencing the risk of periprosthetic fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the forces required for implant failure and fracture in two femoral stems with different neck angles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty osteoporotic composite femurs were prepared and implanted with either a Stryker Accolade II stem with 132° (standard offset) or 127° neck angle (high offset). Femurs were subjected to an axial load using a biaxial servohydroaulic testing machine until failure. Maximum load to failure was recorded. Finite element analysis was conducted to assess stress and strain distributions with the femurs for both implant types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Femurs with a 132° neck angle exhibited significantly higher mean load to failure compared with those with a 127° neck angle (3,537.8 ± 627.9 vs. 2,947.6 ± 507.6 N, P = 0.032). Finite element analysis revealed that maximum stress in femurs with a high offset implant was 9.5% higher than the standard offset (135.9 vs. 124.1 N/m2) and maximum strain was 25.1% higher in the high offset stem compared with the standard offset (1.580e-8 vs. 1.263e-8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher femoral stem offset decreases the ultimate load to failure of the femur. Although high offset stems offer benefits in hip stability and abductor lever arm enhancement, their potential to increase fracture risk must be further explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A critical decision in total hip arthroplasty implant selection is the choice of femoral offset. Femoral offset lateralizes the femoral shaft, tensioning the abductor mechanism providing stability and reducing joint reactive forces. Variations in offset may affect hip biomechanics, potentially influencing the risk of periprosthetic fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the forces required for implant failure and fracture in two femoral stems with different neck angles.

Methods: Twenty osteoporotic composite femurs were prepared and implanted with either a Stryker Accolade II stem with 132° (standard offset) or 127° neck angle (high offset). Femurs were subjected to an axial load using a biaxial servohydroaulic testing machine until failure. Maximum load to failure was recorded. Finite element analysis was conducted to assess stress and strain distributions with the femurs for both implant types.

Results: Femurs with a 132° neck angle exhibited significantly higher mean load to failure compared with those with a 127° neck angle (3,537.8 ± 627.9 vs. 2,947.6 ± 507.6 N, P = 0.032). Finite element analysis revealed that maximum stress in femurs with a high offset implant was 9.5% higher than the standard offset (135.9 vs. 124.1 N/m2) and maximum strain was 25.1% higher in the high offset stem compared with the standard offset (1.580e-8 vs. 1.263e-8).

Conclusion: Higher femoral stem offset decreases the ultimate load to failure of the femur. Although high offset stems offer benefits in hip stability and abductor lever arm enhancement, their potential to increase fracture risk must be further explored.

古老的原理,现代的影响:增加股骨偏置表明全髋关节置换术失败时负荷降低。
背景:全髋关节置换术假体选择的一个关键决定是股骨偏移的选择。股偏置使股骨干外侧化,使外展机制紧绷,提供稳定性并减少关节反作用力。偏移量的变化可能影响髋关节生物力学,潜在地影响假体周围骨折的风险。本研究旨在评估两个不同颈角股骨柄内固定失败和骨折所需的力。方法:制备20例骨质疏松性复合股骨,植入颈角为132°(标准偏移)或127°(高偏移)的Stryker Accolade II柄。使用双轴伺服液压试验机对股骨进行轴向载荷,直至失效。记录最大负载到故障。对两种类型的植入物进行有限元分析以评估股骨的应力和应变分布。结果:132°颈角股骨比127°颈角股骨表现出更高的平均失效负荷(3,537.8±627.9 N比2,947.6±507.6 N, P = 0.032)。有限元分析显示,高偏置假体股骨的最大应力比标准偏置高9.5% (135.9 N/m2比124.1 N/m2),高偏置假体的最大应变比标准偏置高25.1% (1.580e-8比1.263e-8)。结论:较高的股骨柄偏置降低了股骨衰竭的极限负荷。虽然高偏移柄在髋关节稳定性和外展杠杆臂增强方面有好处,但它们增加骨折风险的潜力必须进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信