A Multicenter Retrospective Study: Impact of First-Line Treatment Strategies on second-Line Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib with or Without PD-1 Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S456712
Weihong Ma, Yinyin Li, Yinying Lu, Zhipeng Liang, Hongli Yu, Jie Han, Jiaqi Liu, Wenjing Wang, Caiyun Peng, Jiamin Cheng
{"title":"A Multicenter Retrospective Study: Impact of First-Line Treatment Strategies on second-Line Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib with or Without PD-1 Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Weihong Ma, Yinyin Li, Yinying Lu, Zhipeng Liang, Hongli Yu, Jie Han, Jiaqi Liu, Wenjing Wang, Caiyun Peng, Jiamin Cheng","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S456712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Amid the era of targeted-immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the selection of second-line therapy following failure of diverse first-line regimens remains inadequately explored. This multicenter study aimed to assess how first-line treatment strategies impact the efficacy and safety of second-line regorafenib-either alone or in combination with PD-1 inhibitors-in patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC). Specifically, we focused on two key populations: patients who failed first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy, and a rapidly expanding cohort who progressed after first-line TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy, and to address the critical clinical dilemma of whether to continue immunotherapy in the second line.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 288 uHCC patients from five centers, stratified into two cohorts based on first-line therapy: 126 patients with first-line TKI monotherapy (Pre-Monotherapy cohort) and 162 with first-line TKI+PD-1 combination therapy (Pre-Combination cohort). All received second-line regorafenib alone or with PD-1 inhibitors. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS),objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Pre-Monotherapy cohort, regorafenib plus PD-1 significantly improved outcomes versus regorafenib alone: mPFS (10.5 vs 4.7 months, p<0.001), mOS (18.9 vs 14.0 months, p=0.003), ORR (29.69% vs 4.84%, p<0.001), and DCR (89.06% vs 67.74%, p=0.004). In the Pre-Combination cohort, no significant differences were observed in PFS (9.2 vs 6.3 months, p=0.062), OS (16.2 vs 13.2 months, p=0.13), ORR (22.33% vs 15.25%, p=0.276), or DCR (82.52% vs 74.58%, p=0.227).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Second-line regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors yields significant clinical benefits in uHCC patients who failed first-line TKI monotherapy. However, in those who progress following first-line TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor therapy, continuing immunotherapy in the second line confers no additional efficacy, underscoring the need to explore alternative strategies. This study provides the first evidence-based guidance for the unmet clinical scenario of \"first-line targeted-immunotherapy failure\", highlighting the importance of precision sequential therapy tailored to first-line regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"2123-2137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S456712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Amid the era of targeted-immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the selection of second-line therapy following failure of diverse first-line regimens remains inadequately explored. This multicenter study aimed to assess how first-line treatment strategies impact the efficacy and safety of second-line regorafenib-either alone or in combination with PD-1 inhibitors-in patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC). Specifically, we focused on two key populations: patients who failed first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy, and a rapidly expanding cohort who progressed after first-line TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy, and to address the critical clinical dilemma of whether to continue immunotherapy in the second line.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study enrolled 288 uHCC patients from five centers, stratified into two cohorts based on first-line therapy: 126 patients with first-line TKI monotherapy (Pre-Monotherapy cohort) and 162 with first-line TKI+PD-1 combination therapy (Pre-Combination cohort). All received second-line regorafenib alone or with PD-1 inhibitors. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS),objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results: In the Pre-Monotherapy cohort, regorafenib plus PD-1 significantly improved outcomes versus regorafenib alone: mPFS (10.5 vs 4.7 months, p<0.001), mOS (18.9 vs 14.0 months, p=0.003), ORR (29.69% vs 4.84%, p<0.001), and DCR (89.06% vs 67.74%, p=0.004). In the Pre-Combination cohort, no significant differences were observed in PFS (9.2 vs 6.3 months, p=0.062), OS (16.2 vs 13.2 months, p=0.13), ORR (22.33% vs 15.25%, p=0.276), or DCR (82.52% vs 74.58%, p=0.227).

Conclusion: Second-line regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors yields significant clinical benefits in uHCC patients who failed first-line TKI monotherapy. However, in those who progress following first-line TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor therapy, continuing immunotherapy in the second line confers no additional efficacy, underscoring the need to explore alternative strategies. This study provides the first evidence-based guidance for the unmet clinical scenario of "first-line targeted-immunotherapy failure", highlighting the importance of precision sequential therapy tailored to first-line regimens.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项多中心回顾性研究:一线治疗策略对瑞非尼加或不加PD-1抑制剂治疗不可切除肝细胞癌二线疗效和安全性的影响
目的:在靶向免疫治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的时代,在多种一线治疗方案失败后,二线治疗的选择仍未得到充分探讨。这项多中心研究旨在评估一线治疗策略如何影响二线reorafenib(单独或联合PD-1抑制剂)在不可切除HCC (uHCC)患者中的疗效和安全性。具体来说,我们关注两个关键人群:一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)单药治疗失败的患者,以及一线TKI + PD-1抑制剂联合治疗后进展的快速扩大的队列,并解决是否继续二线免疫治疗的关键临床困境。患者和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了来自5个中心的288例uHCC患者,根据一线治疗分为两组:126例一线TKI单药治疗(单药前队列)和162例一线TKI+PD-1联合治疗(联合前队列)。所有患者均接受了二线瑞非尼单用或PD-1抑制剂联合治疗。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和安全性。结果:在单药治疗前的队列中,瑞非尼加PD-1显著改善了瑞非尼单独治疗的结果:mPFS(10.5个月vs 4.7个月)。结论:二线瑞非尼加PD-1抑制剂对一线TKI单药治疗失败的uHCC患者有显著的临床益处。然而,那些在一线TKI + PD-1抑制剂治疗后进展的患者,在二线继续免疫治疗没有额外的疗效,这强调了探索替代策略的必要性。该研究首次为“一线靶向免疫治疗失败”的未满足临床情况提供了循证指导,强调了针对一线方案进行精确序贯治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信