{"title":"Survival Outcomes of Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutant Resectable Extrahepatic Colorectal Oligometastases After Upfront Metastasectomy.","authors":"Takashi Mori, Shin Kobayashi, Yuichiro Tsukada, Motohiro Kojima, Daichi Kitaguchi, Hiro Hasegawa, Koji Ikeda, Yuji Nishizawa, Naoto Gotohda, Hideaki Bando, Masahiro Tsuboi, Masaaki Ito, Takayuki Yoshino","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01315-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The negative impact of the BRAF V600E mutation (mBRAF) on survival outcomes has been reported for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but the role of mBRAF testing in resectable extrahepatic cases remains unclear. This study aimed to assess survival outcomes in patients with extrahepatic mCRC harboring mBRAF who underwent upfront metastasectomy, compared with patients with unresectable mBRAF tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study was conducted between January 2005 and December 2017. Of 109 patients who underwent initial metastasectomy for extrahepatic mCRC without preoperative chemotherapy, mBRAF, RAS mutations (mRAS), and wild-type RAS/BRAF (wtRAS/BRAF) were found in 6 (5.5%), 64 (58.7%), and 39 (35.8%) patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 39.5 months, patients with mBRAF had a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 4.4 months and overall survival (OS) of 40.6 months. In multivariate survival analysis, mBRAF status was the strongest independent predictor of poor survival, even after adjusting for conventional clinicopathological factors and other mutational statuses (RFS: HR 3.15, p = 0.035; OS: HR 3.85, p = 0.037). The OS after upfront metastasectomy in mBRAF cases was nearly identical to that of unresectable mCRC treated with systemic chemotherapy (HR 1.01, p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technically resectable extrahepatic oligometastases with mBRAF may be considered oncologically unresectable. Preoperative mBRAF testing should be considered for all patients with resectable extrahepatic mCRC, regardless of technical resectability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01315-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The negative impact of the BRAF V600E mutation (mBRAF) on survival outcomes has been reported for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but the role of mBRAF testing in resectable extrahepatic cases remains unclear. This study aimed to assess survival outcomes in patients with extrahepatic mCRC harboring mBRAF who underwent upfront metastasectomy, compared with patients with unresectable mBRAF tumors.
Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted between January 2005 and December 2017. Of 109 patients who underwent initial metastasectomy for extrahepatic mCRC without preoperative chemotherapy, mBRAF, RAS mutations (mRAS), and wild-type RAS/BRAF (wtRAS/BRAF) were found in 6 (5.5%), 64 (58.7%), and 39 (35.8%) patients, respectively.
Results: After a median follow-up of 39.5 months, patients with mBRAF had a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 4.4 months and overall survival (OS) of 40.6 months. In multivariate survival analysis, mBRAF status was the strongest independent predictor of poor survival, even after adjusting for conventional clinicopathological factors and other mutational statuses (RFS: HR 3.15, p = 0.035; OS: HR 3.85, p = 0.037). The OS after upfront metastasectomy in mBRAF cases was nearly identical to that of unresectable mCRC treated with systemic chemotherapy (HR 1.01, p = 0.99).
Conclusion: Technically resectable extrahepatic oligometastases with mBRAF may be considered oncologically unresectable. Preoperative mBRAF testing should be considered for all patients with resectable extrahepatic mCRC, regardless of technical resectability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology: This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.