The Impact of Cystic Fibrosis Algorithm Changes: A Case Study of Challenges and Strategies.

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jerusalem Alleyne, Kenneth Coursey, Kimberly Noble Piper, Cynthia Cass, Michael Pentella
{"title":"The Impact of Cystic Fibrosis Algorithm Changes: A Case Study of Challenges and Strategies.","authors":"Jerusalem Alleyne, Kenneth Coursey, Kimberly Noble Piper, Cynthia Cass, Michael Pentella","doi":"10.3390/ijns11030082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The State Hygienic Lab at the University of Iowa (SHL) performs newborn blood spot screening (NBS) for IA, AK, ND, and SD. In October 2022, we halted in-house <i>CFTR</i> DNA testing due to the unexpected nonperformance of our newly expanded variant panel. Samples were sent to a reference laboratory to ensure uninterrupted testing and by December 2022, SHL had selected an alternative test that enabled <i>CFTR</i> panel expansion as envisioned. However, due to circumstances beyond our control, test implementation was severely delayed, and in-house testing was paused. These events were consequential. Firstly, our prolonged utilization of reference labs and fees was a financial strain on the lab. Secondly, our timeliness decreased significantly, and lastly, these issues were burdensome for staff. The lab overcame these problems using three strategies: effective communication; technical expertise; and staff perseverance. Finally, in Aug 2023, SHL successfully resumed in-house testing. As state labs ponder major <i>CFTR</i> algorithm changes, such as the addition of next generation sequencing, the strategies we utilized can be useful during sudden setbacks. Our experience of replacing our <i>CFTR</i> assay underscores the importance of emergency preparedness and partnership within the NBS community.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11030082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The State Hygienic Lab at the University of Iowa (SHL) performs newborn blood spot screening (NBS) for IA, AK, ND, and SD. In October 2022, we halted in-house CFTR DNA testing due to the unexpected nonperformance of our newly expanded variant panel. Samples were sent to a reference laboratory to ensure uninterrupted testing and by December 2022, SHL had selected an alternative test that enabled CFTR panel expansion as envisioned. However, due to circumstances beyond our control, test implementation was severely delayed, and in-house testing was paused. These events were consequential. Firstly, our prolonged utilization of reference labs and fees was a financial strain on the lab. Secondly, our timeliness decreased significantly, and lastly, these issues were burdensome for staff. The lab overcame these problems using three strategies: effective communication; technical expertise; and staff perseverance. Finally, in Aug 2023, SHL successfully resumed in-house testing. As state labs ponder major CFTR algorithm changes, such as the addition of next generation sequencing, the strategies we utilized can be useful during sudden setbacks. Our experience of replacing our CFTR assay underscores the importance of emergency preparedness and partnership within the NBS community.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

囊性纤维化算法变化的影响:挑战和策略的案例研究。
爱荷华大学的国家卫生实验室(SHL)对IA、AK、ND和SD进行新生儿血斑筛查(NBS)。2022年10月,我们暂停了内部CFTR DNA测试,原因是我们新扩展的变异面板意外失效。样品被送到参考实验室,以确保不间断的测试,到2022年12月,SHL选择了一种替代测试,使CFTR面板能够按照设想进行扩展。然而,由于我们无法控制的情况,测试实施被严重延迟,内部测试被暂停。这些事件影响深远。首先,我们对参考实验室的长期使用和费用对实验室造成了财政压力。其次,我们的及时性明显下降,最后,这些问题给工作人员带来了负担。实验室通过三种策略克服了这些问题:有效的沟通;专业技术;和员工的毅力。最后,在2023年8月,SHL成功地恢复了内部测试。随着国家实验室考虑CFTR算法的重大变化,例如增加下一代测序,我们使用的策略在突然挫折时可能有用。我们更换CFTR检测方法的经验强调了应急准备和国家统计局内部伙伴关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
International Journal of Neonatal Screening Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信