{"title":"The Impact of Cystic Fibrosis Algorithm Changes: A Case Study of Challenges and Strategies.","authors":"Jerusalem Alleyne, Kenneth Coursey, Kimberly Noble Piper, Cynthia Cass, Michael Pentella","doi":"10.3390/ijns11030082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The State Hygienic Lab at the University of Iowa (SHL) performs newborn blood spot screening (NBS) for IA, AK, ND, and SD. In October 2022, we halted in-house <i>CFTR</i> DNA testing due to the unexpected nonperformance of our newly expanded variant panel. Samples were sent to a reference laboratory to ensure uninterrupted testing and by December 2022, SHL had selected an alternative test that enabled <i>CFTR</i> panel expansion as envisioned. However, due to circumstances beyond our control, test implementation was severely delayed, and in-house testing was paused. These events were consequential. Firstly, our prolonged utilization of reference labs and fees was a financial strain on the lab. Secondly, our timeliness decreased significantly, and lastly, these issues were burdensome for staff. The lab overcame these problems using three strategies: effective communication; technical expertise; and staff perseverance. Finally, in Aug 2023, SHL successfully resumed in-house testing. As state labs ponder major <i>CFTR</i> algorithm changes, such as the addition of next generation sequencing, the strategies we utilized can be useful during sudden setbacks. Our experience of replacing our <i>CFTR</i> assay underscores the importance of emergency preparedness and partnership within the NBS community.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11030082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The State Hygienic Lab at the University of Iowa (SHL) performs newborn blood spot screening (NBS) for IA, AK, ND, and SD. In October 2022, we halted in-house CFTR DNA testing due to the unexpected nonperformance of our newly expanded variant panel. Samples were sent to a reference laboratory to ensure uninterrupted testing and by December 2022, SHL had selected an alternative test that enabled CFTR panel expansion as envisioned. However, due to circumstances beyond our control, test implementation was severely delayed, and in-house testing was paused. These events were consequential. Firstly, our prolonged utilization of reference labs and fees was a financial strain on the lab. Secondly, our timeliness decreased significantly, and lastly, these issues were burdensome for staff. The lab overcame these problems using three strategies: effective communication; technical expertise; and staff perseverance. Finally, in Aug 2023, SHL successfully resumed in-house testing. As state labs ponder major CFTR algorithm changes, such as the addition of next generation sequencing, the strategies we utilized can be useful during sudden setbacks. Our experience of replacing our CFTR assay underscores the importance of emergency preparedness and partnership within the NBS community.