Trust in the organization as a mediator in the relationship of good organizational context with employee well-being.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Agnieszka Czerw, Damian Grabowski, Agata Chudzicka-Czupała, Katarzyna Stąpor
{"title":"Trust in the organization as a mediator in the relationship of good organizational context with employee well-being.","authors":"Agnieszka Czerw, Damian Grabowski, Agata Chudzicka-Czupała, Katarzyna Stąpor","doi":"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined whether trust in supervisor, co-workers, and the organization mediates the relationship between organizational context and employee well-being. The research aimed to identify which components of trust have the strongest mediating effect, which organizational context elements are most strongly related to trust, and which dimensions of well-being are best explained by this model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 1113 employees from various Polish organizations, averaging 45 years of age, with 41% having higher education. Participants completed questionnaires measuring areas of worklife, authentic leadership, trust propensity, trust in supervisors, trust in co-workers, trust in organization, workplace well-being, job satisfaction, and work stress. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze relationships between 3 latent variables: well-functioning organization (WFO), full trust in the organization (FTO), and well-being in the workplace (WB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-fitting model showed that full trust in the organization completely mediates the relationship between a WFO and WB. The WFO explained 90% of the variance in FTO. The WFO most strongly explained trust in the organization as a whole (81%) and trust in supervisors (68%), with weaker explanation of trust in coworkers (37%). The FTO explained 87% of the variance in WB, which in turn was strongly associated with job satisfaction (70% of variance) and negatively with work stress (34% of variance).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A wellfunctioning organization characterized by value congruence, fair rewards, recognition, authentic leadership, and supportive peer groups strongly influences full organizational trust, which in turn enhances well-being and job satisfaction while reducing work stress. Trust serves as a complete mediator between organizational context and employee well-being, with trust in the organization and in supervisors playing particularly important roles in this relationship. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2025;38(4).</p>","PeriodicalId":14173,"journal":{"name":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined whether trust in supervisor, co-workers, and the organization mediates the relationship between organizational context and employee well-being. The research aimed to identify which components of trust have the strongest mediating effect, which organizational context elements are most strongly related to trust, and which dimensions of well-being are best explained by this model.

Material and methods: The study involved 1113 employees from various Polish organizations, averaging 45 years of age, with 41% having higher education. Participants completed questionnaires measuring areas of worklife, authentic leadership, trust propensity, trust in supervisors, trust in co-workers, trust in organization, workplace well-being, job satisfaction, and work stress. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze relationships between 3 latent variables: well-functioning organization (WFO), full trust in the organization (FTO), and well-being in the workplace (WB).

Results: The best-fitting model showed that full trust in the organization completely mediates the relationship between a WFO and WB. The WFO explained 90% of the variance in FTO. The WFO most strongly explained trust in the organization as a whole (81%) and trust in supervisors (68%), with weaker explanation of trust in coworkers (37%). The FTO explained 87% of the variance in WB, which in turn was strongly associated with job satisfaction (70% of variance) and negatively with work stress (34% of variance).

Conclusions: A wellfunctioning organization characterized by value congruence, fair rewards, recognition, authentic leadership, and supportive peer groups strongly influences full organizational trust, which in turn enhances well-being and job satisfaction while reducing work stress. Trust serves as a complete mediator between organizational context and employee well-being, with trust in the organization and in supervisors playing particularly important roles in this relationship. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2025;38(4).

组织信任在良好组织情境与员工幸福感的关系中起中介作用。
目的:本研究考察了对上司、同事和组织的信任是否在组织情境与员工幸福感之间起中介作用。该研究旨在确定信任的哪些组成部分具有最强的中介效应,哪些组织情境因素与信任关系最密切,以及幸福感的哪些维度最能被该模型解释。材料和方法:该研究涉及来自波兰不同组织的1113名员工,平均年龄为45岁,其中41%受过高等教育。参与者完成了问卷调查,测量了工作生活、真实领导、信任倾向、对主管的信任、对同事的信任、对组织的信任、工作场所幸福感、工作满意度和工作压力。采用结构方程模型分析了3个潜在变量:良好功能组织(WFO)、对组织的充分信任(FTO)和工作场所幸福感(WB)之间的关系。结果:最佳拟合模型表明,对组织的充分信任完全中介了工作满意度和工作绩效之间的关系。WFO解释了FTO中90%的差异。WFO最有力地解释了对组织整体的信任(81%)和对主管的信任(68%),对同事的信任的解释较弱(37%)。FTO解释了工作满意度中87%的方差,而工作满意度与工作满意度(占方差的70%)密切相关,与工作压力(占方差的34%)负相关。结论:一个以价值一致性、公平奖励、认可、真实领导和支持性同伴群体为特征的功能良好的组织,会强烈影响组织的充分信任,从而提高幸福感和工作满意度,同时减少工作压力。信任在组织环境和员工幸福感之间起着完全的中介作用,其中对组织和主管的信任在这一关系中起着特别重要的作用。国际医学与环境卫生杂志,2015;38(4)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal is dedicated to present the contemporary research in occupational and environmental health from all over the world. It publishes works concerning: occupational and environmental: medicine, epidemiology, hygiene and toxicology; work physiology and ergonomics, musculoskeletal problems; psychosocial factors at work, work-related mental problems, aging, work ability and return to work; working hours, shift work; reproductive factors and endocrine disruptors; radiation, ionizing and non-ionizing health effects; agricultural hazards; work safety and injury and occupational health service; climate change and its effects on health; omics, genetics and epigenetics in occupational and environmental health; health effects of exposure to nanoparticles and nanotechnology products; human biomarkers in occupational and environmental health, intervention studies, clinical sciences’ achievements with potential to improve occupational and environmental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信