Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block in combination with adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_486_25
Rajendra K Sahoo, Laxman K Senapati, Prateek Mitra, Ganesh C Satapathy, Abhijit S Nair, Priyadarsini Samanta
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block in combination with adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Rajendra K Sahoo, Laxman K Senapati, Prateek Mitra, Ganesh C Satapathy, Abhijit S Nair, Priyadarsini Samanta","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_486_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Distal motor-sparing nerve blocks are increasingly popular for knee arthroplasty pain. Genicular nerve ablation, initially proposed for knee osteoarthritis, is also currently used for postoperative pain management. We hypothesised that superior postoperative analgesia can be achieved by combining genicular nerve block with adductor canal block (ACB) by reducing 24-hour opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients were assigned to Group I (ultrasound-guided ACB with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone and ultrasound-guided superomedial (SM), superolateral (SL), and inferomedial (IM) GNB with 5 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 2 mg of dexamethasone at each location and Group II (ultrasound-guided ACB with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine, 4 mg dexamethasone, and ultrasound-guided three-location GNB with 15 mL of 0.9% saline). The outcomes measured were 24-hour morphine consumption, pain scores over 24 hours, and the time to rescue analgesia. The continuous data were analysed using an unpaired <i>t</i>-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Chi-square test was used to analyse the categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total consumption of morphine (mg) was 5.96 [standard deviation (SD): 2.73] in Group I and 15.52 (SD: 2.67) in Group II, with a mean difference of 9.56 [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.66, -2.39] (<i>P</i> < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.54). In Group II, the mean time for first rescue analgesia was 20.73 (SD: 7.28) hours, whereas it was 24.00 (SD: 0.00) hours in Group I, with a mean difference of -3.27 (95% CI: -11.33, 4.783) (<i>P</i> = 0.034, Cohen's d = 0.45). Pain severity at rest was substantially lower in Group I at 6 hours (<i>P</i> = 0.020), 12 hours (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and 24 hours (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Pain score with movement in Group I was considerably lower at 6 hours (<i>P</i> = 0.008) and 12 hours (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining genicular block with ACB provided superior postoperative analgesia and reduced opioid consumption compared to ACB alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 10","pages":"1012-1018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_486_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Distal motor-sparing nerve blocks are increasingly popular for knee arthroplasty pain. Genicular nerve ablation, initially proposed for knee osteoarthritis, is also currently used for postoperative pain management. We hypothesised that superior postoperative analgesia can be achieved by combining genicular nerve block with adductor canal block (ACB) by reducing 24-hour opioid consumption.

Methods: Fifty patients were assigned to Group I (ultrasound-guided ACB with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone and ultrasound-guided superomedial (SM), superolateral (SL), and inferomedial (IM) GNB with 5 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and 2 mg of dexamethasone at each location and Group II (ultrasound-guided ACB with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine, 4 mg dexamethasone, and ultrasound-guided three-location GNB with 15 mL of 0.9% saline). The outcomes measured were 24-hour morphine consumption, pain scores over 24 hours, and the time to rescue analgesia. The continuous data were analysed using an unpaired t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Chi-square test was used to analyse the categorical variables.

Results: The mean total consumption of morphine (mg) was 5.96 [standard deviation (SD): 2.73] in Group I and 15.52 (SD: 2.67) in Group II, with a mean difference of 9.56 [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.66, -2.39] (P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.54). In Group II, the mean time for first rescue analgesia was 20.73 (SD: 7.28) hours, whereas it was 24.00 (SD: 0.00) hours in Group I, with a mean difference of -3.27 (95% CI: -11.33, 4.783) (P = 0.034, Cohen's d = 0.45). Pain severity at rest was substantially lower in Group I at 6 hours (P = 0.020), 12 hours (P = 0.003), and 24 hours (P = 0.002). Pain score with movement in Group I was considerably lower at 6 hours (P = 0.008) and 12 hours (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Combining genicular block with ACB provided superior postoperative analgesia and reduced opioid consumption compared to ACB alone.

超声引导下膝神经阻滞联合内收管阻滞在全膝关节置换术中的镇痛效果:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
背景和目的:远端保留运动神经阻滞治疗膝关节置换术疼痛越来越受欢迎。膝神经消融术,最初建议用于膝关节骨关节炎,目前也用于术后疼痛管理。我们假设通过膝神经阻滞和内收管阻滞(ACB)联合减少24小时阿片类药物的消耗,可以实现更好的术后镇痛。方法:50例患者分为超声引导ACB组(0.25%罗哌卡因+ 4 mg)和超声引导上内侧(SM)、上外侧(SL)、内侧间(IM) GNB组(5ml 0.25%罗哌卡因+ 2 mg地塞米松)和超声引导ACB组(0.25%罗哌卡因+ 4 mg地塞米松+ 20 mL超声引导三部位GNB + 15 mL 0.9%生理盐水)。测量结果为24小时吗啡用量、24小时疼痛评分和镇痛恢复时间。连续资料分析采用非配对t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验,分类变量分析采用卡方检验。结果:ⅰ组和ⅱ组吗啡平均总用量(mg)分别为5.96和15.52 mg (SD: 2.67),平均差异为9.56 mg[95%可信区间(CI): -4.66, -2.39] (P < 0.001, Cohen’SD = 3.54)。II组患者首次抢救镇痛平均时间为20.73 (SD: 7.28)小时,而I组患者首次抢救镇痛平均时间为24.00 (SD: 0.00)小时,平均差异为-3.27 (95% CI: -11.33, 4.783) (P = 0.034, Cohen’SD = 0.45)。静息疼痛严重程度在6小时(P = 0.020)、12小时(P = 0.003)和24小时(P = 0.002)时显著降低。第1组在6小时(P = 0.008)和12小时(P < 0.001)时疼痛随运动评分明显降低。结论:与单独ACB相比,膝阻滞联合ACB具有更好的术后镇痛效果,并减少阿片类药物的消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信