Comparison of a novel anterior out-of-plane approach with standard in-plane approach in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_615_25
Nikkila Mai Nandagopan, V K Mohan, Adethen Gunasekaran, Rajasekar Ramadurai, Prasanna U Bidkar
{"title":"Comparison of a novel anterior out-of-plane approach with standard in-plane approach in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Nikkila Mai Nandagopan, V K Mohan, Adethen Gunasekaran, Rajasekar Ramadurai, Prasanna U Bidkar","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_615_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Subclavian vein cannulation is a commonly performed procedure in the operating room. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation can be done using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach. This study compares the in-plane technique with a novel anterior out-of-plane technique. The primary objective of the study was to compare the first-pass success rate between the anterior out-of-plane technique approach and the in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial included 128 patients undergoing elective surgeries that required central vein cannulation. Patients were randomised to either the anterior out-of-plane or in-plane technique for ultrasound-guided subclavian central venous access. First-pass success rates, puncture and cannulation times, needle redirections, additional punctures, and complications were recorded and compared between groups. Continuous variables were analysed using independent-sample <i>t</i>-tests, and categorical variables with Chi-square tests. Normality was confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test; <i>P</i> values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful cannulation was achieved in 119 patients. The first-pass success rate was significantly higher with the anterior out-of-plane approach (95%) compared to the in-plane approach (77%) (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The out-of-plane approach demonstrated shorter puncture [9 (SD: 3) seconds] and cannulation times [148 (SD: 31) seconds) compared to the in-plane approach [17 (SD: 9) seconds and 185 (SD: 32) seconds, respectively]. Additionally, fewer needle redirections, punctures, and complications, including arterial punctures (1 vs 5), were observed with the out-of-plane approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation is more successful and efficient using this novel anterior out-of-plane approach compared to the standard in-plane approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 10","pages":"1019-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_615_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Subclavian vein cannulation is a commonly performed procedure in the operating room. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation can be done using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach. This study compares the in-plane technique with a novel anterior out-of-plane technique. The primary objective of the study was to compare the first-pass success rate between the anterior out-of-plane technique approach and the in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation.

Methods: This single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial included 128 patients undergoing elective surgeries that required central vein cannulation. Patients were randomised to either the anterior out-of-plane or in-plane technique for ultrasound-guided subclavian central venous access. First-pass success rates, puncture and cannulation times, needle redirections, additional punctures, and complications were recorded and compared between groups. Continuous variables were analysed using independent-sample t-tests, and categorical variables with Chi-square tests. Normality was confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test; P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Successful cannulation was achieved in 119 patients. The first-pass success rate was significantly higher with the anterior out-of-plane approach (95%) compared to the in-plane approach (77%) (P < 0.05). The out-of-plane approach demonstrated shorter puncture [9 (SD: 3) seconds] and cannulation times [148 (SD: 31) seconds) compared to the in-plane approach [17 (SD: 9) seconds and 185 (SD: 32) seconds, respectively]. Additionally, fewer needle redirections, punctures, and complications, including arterial punctures (1 vs 5), were observed with the out-of-plane approach.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation is more successful and efficient using this novel anterior out-of-plane approach compared to the standard in-plane approach.

超声引导的锁骨上锁骨下静脉置管中新型前路平面外入路与标准平面内入路的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景与目的:锁骨下静脉插管是手术室常用的一种手术方式。超声引导的锁骨上锁骨下静脉插管可采用平面内或平面外入路。本研究比较了面内技术和一种新的前路面外技术。本研究的主要目的是比较超声引导下锁骨下静脉插管前路平面外技术入路和平面内入路的首次成功率。方法:这项单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验包括128例需要中央静脉插管的择期手术患者。患者被随机分配到超声引导下锁骨下中心静脉通路的前平面外或平面内技术。记录两组间的首次成功率、穿刺和插管时间、针头重定向、额外穿刺和并发症。连续变量采用独立样本t检验,分类变量采用卡方检验。夏皮罗-威尔克检验证实了正态性;P值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:119例患者插管成功。前路面外入路首次通过成功率(95%)明显高于面内入路(77%)(P < 0.05)。与面内入路[17 (SD: 9)秒和185 (SD: 32)秒]相比,面外入路穿刺时间[9 (SD: 3)秒]和插管时间[148 (SD: 31)秒]更短。此外,在平面外入路观察到更少的针头重定向、穿刺和并发症,包括动脉穿刺(1 vs 5)。结论:超声引导下的锁骨上锁骨下静脉插管采用这种新的前路平面外入路比标准平面内入路更成功和有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信