Comparison of a novel anterior out-of-plane approach with standard in-plane approach in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation: A randomised controlled trial.
Nikkila Mai Nandagopan, V K Mohan, Adethen Gunasekaran, Rajasekar Ramadurai, Prasanna U Bidkar
{"title":"Comparison of a novel anterior out-of-plane approach with standard in-plane approach in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Nikkila Mai Nandagopan, V K Mohan, Adethen Gunasekaran, Rajasekar Ramadurai, Prasanna U Bidkar","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_615_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Subclavian vein cannulation is a commonly performed procedure in the operating room. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation can be done using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach. This study compares the in-plane technique with a novel anterior out-of-plane technique. The primary objective of the study was to compare the first-pass success rate between the anterior out-of-plane technique approach and the in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial included 128 patients undergoing elective surgeries that required central vein cannulation. Patients were randomised to either the anterior out-of-plane or in-plane technique for ultrasound-guided subclavian central venous access. First-pass success rates, puncture and cannulation times, needle redirections, additional punctures, and complications were recorded and compared between groups. Continuous variables were analysed using independent-sample <i>t</i>-tests, and categorical variables with Chi-square tests. Normality was confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test; <i>P</i> values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful cannulation was achieved in 119 patients. The first-pass success rate was significantly higher with the anterior out-of-plane approach (95%) compared to the in-plane approach (77%) (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The out-of-plane approach demonstrated shorter puncture [9 (SD: 3) seconds] and cannulation times [148 (SD: 31) seconds) compared to the in-plane approach [17 (SD: 9) seconds and 185 (SD: 32) seconds, respectively]. Additionally, fewer needle redirections, punctures, and complications, including arterial punctures (1 vs 5), were observed with the out-of-plane approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation is more successful and efficient using this novel anterior out-of-plane approach compared to the standard in-plane approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 10","pages":"1019-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_615_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Subclavian vein cannulation is a commonly performed procedure in the operating room. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation can be done using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach. This study compares the in-plane technique with a novel anterior out-of-plane technique. The primary objective of the study was to compare the first-pass success rate between the anterior out-of-plane technique approach and the in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation.
Methods: This single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial included 128 patients undergoing elective surgeries that required central vein cannulation. Patients were randomised to either the anterior out-of-plane or in-plane technique for ultrasound-guided subclavian central venous access. First-pass success rates, puncture and cannulation times, needle redirections, additional punctures, and complications were recorded and compared between groups. Continuous variables were analysed using independent-sample t-tests, and categorical variables with Chi-square tests. Normality was confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test; P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: Successful cannulation was achieved in 119 patients. The first-pass success rate was significantly higher with the anterior out-of-plane approach (95%) compared to the in-plane approach (77%) (P < 0.05). The out-of-plane approach demonstrated shorter puncture [9 (SD: 3) seconds] and cannulation times [148 (SD: 31) seconds) compared to the in-plane approach [17 (SD: 9) seconds and 185 (SD: 32) seconds, respectively]. Additionally, fewer needle redirections, punctures, and complications, including arterial punctures (1 vs 5), were observed with the out-of-plane approach.
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation is more successful and efficient using this novel anterior out-of-plane approach compared to the standard in-plane approach.