Imputation of arterial oxygen partial pressures using pulse oximetry in surgical patients under general anaesthesia: A prospective cohort study.

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_153_25
Mohamad F El-Khatib, Marwan Rizk, Amro Khalili, Thuraya HajAli, Ibrahim El Mallah, Rasha Shreim, Carine Zeeni
{"title":"Imputation of arterial oxygen partial pressures using pulse oximetry in surgical patients under general anaesthesia: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Mohamad F El-Khatib, Marwan Rizk, Amro Khalili, Thuraya HajAli, Ibrahim El Mallah, Rasha Shreim, Carine Zeeni","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_153_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Monitoring oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) during general anaesthesia using pulse oximetry is mandatory, though it may not always reflect the actual oxygenation status. Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis remains the gold standard for measuring the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), but it is invasive and limited by complications. This study aims to validate five existing equations for predicting PaO<sub>2</sub> from SpO<sub>2</sub> and, if applicable, to derive and validate a new equation in adult patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia and requiring ABG measurements at several time points intraoperatively. Using SPSS software, a Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the agreement between derived and measured PaO2 values using five existing equations. Regression analysis was then performed to develop a new equation for predicting PaO<sub>2</sub>, which was validated in a second cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the initial phase, 150 ABG samples were collected from 83 patients. Bland-Altman analysis revealed weak agreements with all existing equations. A new logarithmic equation, El-Khatib's equation (PaO<sub>2</sub> = 10<sup>-25.6</sup> × SpO<sub>2</sub> <sup>13.9</sup>), was derived. The validation phase involved 150 ABG samples from 65 patients, demonstrating strong agreement with El-Khatib's equation (systematic bias of 13 mmHg, limits of agreement: -189 to 214 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Five existing equations for predicting PaO<sub>2</sub> from SpO<sub>2</sub> revealed weak agreement in adult patients under general anaesthesia. El-Khatib's equation demonstrated strong potential for predicting PaO<sub>2</sub>, providing a reliable non-invasive alternative for determining PaO<sub>2</sub> in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 10","pages":"1047-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_153_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Monitoring oxygen saturation (SpO2) during general anaesthesia using pulse oximetry is mandatory, though it may not always reflect the actual oxygenation status. Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis remains the gold standard for measuring the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), but it is invasive and limited by complications. This study aims to validate five existing equations for predicting PaO2 from SpO2 and, if applicable, to derive and validate a new equation in adult patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia and requiring ABG measurements at several time points intraoperatively. Using SPSS software, a Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the agreement between derived and measured PaO2 values using five existing equations. Regression analysis was then performed to develop a new equation for predicting PaO2, which was validated in a second cohort.

Results: During the initial phase, 150 ABG samples were collected from 83 patients. Bland-Altman analysis revealed weak agreements with all existing equations. A new logarithmic equation, El-Khatib's equation (PaO2 = 10-25.6 × SpO2 13.9), was derived. The validation phase involved 150 ABG samples from 65 patients, demonstrating strong agreement with El-Khatib's equation (systematic bias of 13 mmHg, limits of agreement: -189 to 214 mmHg).

Conclusion: Five existing equations for predicting PaO2 from SpO2 revealed weak agreement in adult patients under general anaesthesia. El-Khatib's equation demonstrated strong potential for predicting PaO2, providing a reliable non-invasive alternative for determining PaO2 in clinical practice.

在全麻手术患者中应用脉搏血氧仪测量动脉氧分压:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景和目的:在全身麻醉期间使用脉搏血氧仪监测血氧饱和度(SpO2)是强制性的,尽管它可能并不总是反映实际的氧合状态。动脉血气(ABG)分析仍然是测量氧分压(PaO2)的金标准,但它具有侵入性,并受到并发症的限制。本研究旨在验证从SpO2预测PaO2的五个现有方程,如果适用,在全麻醉下接受手术的成人患者中推导并验证一个新的方程。方法:一项前瞻性队列研究对接受全身麻醉并在术中几个时间点需要测量ABG的成年患者进行了研究。使用SPSS软件进行Bland-Altman分析,以评估使用五个现有方程得出的PaO2值与测量值之间的一致性。然后进行回归分析,建立预测PaO2的新方程,并在第二组队列中进行验证。结果:在初始阶段,从83例患者中收集了150份ABG样本。Bland-Altman分析揭示了与所有现有方程的弱一致性。导出了新的对数方程El-Khatib方程(PaO2 = 10-25.6 × SpO2 13.9)。验证阶段涉及来自65名患者的150份ABG样本,证明与El-Khatib方程(系统偏倚为13 mmHg,一致性限:-189至214 mmHg)非常吻合。结论:用SpO2预测PaO2的现有5个方程在全麻成人患者中一致性较弱。El-Khatib的公式显示了预测PaO2的强大潜力,为临床实践中确定PaO2提供了可靠的非侵入性替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信