Stopping versus continuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors before surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_416_25
Marwah Algodi, Omar Saab, Alhareth Al-Sagban, Hashim T Hashim, Ahmed D Al-Obaidi, Mohanad Albayyaa, Bashar Al-Hemyari
{"title":"Stopping versus continuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors before surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Marwah Algodi, Omar Saab, Alhareth Al-Sagban, Hashim T Hashim, Ahmed D Al-Obaidi, Mohanad Albayyaa, Bashar Al-Hemyari","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_416_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The optimal perioperative management of patients chronically using renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) is still uncertain. This study aims to compare the outcomes of withholding versus continuing RASIs before surgery, focusing on efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesising evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science until September 2024. Using Stata MP v. 17, we used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes by using the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs with 3,740 patients were included. There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [Risk ratio (RR): 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84, 1.16; P = 0.88], all-cause mortality (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.78; <i>P</i> = 0.72), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR: 1.67; 95% CI: 0.61, 4.58; <i>P</i> = 0.32), heart failure/acute pulmonary oedema (RR: 1.87; 95% CI: 0.51, 6.84; <i>P</i> = 0.34), stroke (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.35, 4.24; <i>P</i> = 0.75), postoperative hypotension (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.10; <i>P</i> = 0.22), perioperative hypertension (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.46; <i>P</i> = 0.05), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26; <i>P</i> = 0.97). However, withholding RASIs was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of intraoperative hypotension (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.89; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stopping RASIs in patients undergoing surgery was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications, such as MACE, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure/acute pulmonary oedema, stroke, or AKI. Conversely, discontinuing RASIs notably reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 10","pages":"984-998"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_416_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The optimal perioperative management of patients chronically using renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) is still uncertain. This study aims to compare the outcomes of withholding versus continuing RASIs before surgery, focusing on efficacy and safety.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesising evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science until September 2024. Using Stata MP v. 17, we used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes by using the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Ten RCTs with 3,740 patients were included. There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [Risk ratio (RR): 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84, 1.16; P = 0.88], all-cause mortality (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.78; P = 0.72), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR: 1.67; 95% CI: 0.61, 4.58; P = 0.32), heart failure/acute pulmonary oedema (RR: 1.87; 95% CI: 0.51, 6.84; P = 0.34), stroke (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.35, 4.24; P = 0.75), postoperative hypotension (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.10; P = 0.22), perioperative hypertension (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.46; P = 0.05), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26; P = 0.97). However, withholding RASIs was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of intraoperative hypotension (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.89; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Stopping RASIs in patients undergoing surgery was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications, such as MACE, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure/acute pulmonary oedema, stroke, or AKI. Conversely, discontinuing RASIs notably reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypotension.

术前停用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂与继续使用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂:随机对照试验的最新系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:长期使用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASIs)患者的最佳围手术期管理仍不确定。本研究旨在比较术前停止RASIs与持续RASIs的结果,重点是疗效和安全性。方法:系统回顾和荟萃分析,综合了截至2024年9月从PubMed、CENTRAL、Scopus和Web of Science获得的随机对照试验(rct)的证据。使用Stata MP v. 17,我们使用固定效应模型,通过使用95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)来报告二分类结果。结果:纳入10项随机对照试验,共3740例患者。两组主要心脏不良事件(MACE)发生率比较,差异无统计学意义[危险比(RR): 0.99;95%置信区间(CI): 0.84, 1.16;P = 0.88),全因死亡率(RR: 0.88; 95%置信区间CI: 0.44, 1.78; P = 0.72),心肌梗死(MI)(相对风险:1.67;95%置信区间CI: 0.61, 4.58; P = 0.32),心力衰竭或急性肺部水肿(相对风险:1.87;95%置信区间CI: 0.51, 6.84; P = 0.34),中风(RR: 1.22; 95%置信区间CI: 0.35, 4.24; P = 0.75),术后低血压(相对风险:0.85;95%置信区间CI: 0.66, 1.10; P = 0.22),围手术期高血压(相对风险:1.21;95%置信区间CI: 1.00, 1.46; P = 0.05),和急性肾损伤(AKI)(相对风险:1.01;95%置信区间CI: 0.80, 1.26; P = 0.97)。然而,不使用RASIs与术中低血压发生率降低显著相关(RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.89; P < 0.001)。结论:手术患者停止RASIs与术后并发症的高风险无关,如MACE、全因死亡率、心肌梗死、心力衰竭/急性肺水肿、中风或AKI。相反,停用RASIs可显著降低术中低血压的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信