'How Good to Finally Have Options!' A Qualitative Reflexive Thematic Analysis Exploring Parents' Perceptions of Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Caries Management Strategies.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Una Stamere, Inese Stars, Nicola Innes, Natalija Protasa, Sergio E Uribe, Rodrigo Mariño, Ilze Maldupa
{"title":"'How Good to Finally Have Options!' A Qualitative Reflexive Thematic Analysis Exploring Parents' Perceptions of Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Caries Management Strategies.","authors":"Una Stamere, Inese Stars, Nicola Innes, Natalija Protasa, Sergio E Uribe, Rodrigo Mariño, Ilze Maldupa","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Caries prevalence remains high in Latvia, with limited adoption of minimally invasive dentistry (MID). While provider barriers are known, parental perspectives are underexplored. This study examined Latvian parents' views on MID to identify key barriers and facilitators to its acceptance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An inductive qualitative approach was applied to explore parents' perceptions of non-invasive and minimally invasive caries management strategies. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, conducted with parents (n = 19) whose children had experience of either minimally invasive or traditional caries management. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes were generated: (1) 'avoiding unnecesary discomfort and distress' described parents' views and experiences of non-invasive and minimally invasive caries management strategies as physically and psychologically less traumatic for their child and themselves; (2) 'prioritising treatment qualities', explored parents' expectations and priorities regarding the qualities offered by different dental treatment options; (3) 'the power of information', illustrated that parents' awareness of non-invasive and minimally invasive caries management strategies contributed to a better understanding of treatments and promoted choice, but required access to that information; and (4) 'choices of suitable options', described parents' reflections on having a variety of options for dental treatment, rather than a single option offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents value effective communication, clear information and access to treatment options when considering minimally invasive caries management. Their views highlight the need for a shift towards patient-centred care models that prioritise comfort, informed decision-making and choice in paediatric dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Caries prevalence remains high in Latvia, with limited adoption of minimally invasive dentistry (MID). While provider barriers are known, parental perspectives are underexplored. This study examined Latvian parents' views on MID to identify key barriers and facilitators to its acceptance.

Methods: An inductive qualitative approach was applied to explore parents' perceptions of non-invasive and minimally invasive caries management strategies. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, conducted with parents (n = 19) whose children had experience of either minimally invasive or traditional caries management. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Four main themes were generated: (1) 'avoiding unnecesary discomfort and distress' described parents' views and experiences of non-invasive and minimally invasive caries management strategies as physically and psychologically less traumatic for their child and themselves; (2) 'prioritising treatment qualities', explored parents' expectations and priorities regarding the qualities offered by different dental treatment options; (3) 'the power of information', illustrated that parents' awareness of non-invasive and minimally invasive caries management strategies contributed to a better understanding of treatments and promoted choice, but required access to that information; and (4) 'choices of suitable options', described parents' reflections on having a variety of options for dental treatment, rather than a single option offered.

Conclusions: Parents value effective communication, clear information and access to treatment options when considering minimally invasive caries management. Their views highlight the need for a shift towards patient-centred care models that prioritise comfort, informed decision-making and choice in paediatric dentistry.

“终于有选择了,多好啊!”一项探讨家长对非侵入性和微创性龋齿治疗策略认知的定性反思性专题分析。
目的:拉脱维亚的龋齿患病率仍然很高,微创牙科(MID)的采用有限。虽然提供者的障碍是已知的,但父母的观点尚未得到充分探讨。本研究调查了拉脱维亚父母对MID的看法,以确定其接受的主要障碍和促进因素。方法:采用归纳定性方法探讨家长对非侵入性和微创性龋齿治疗策略的看法。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,对19名儿童接受过微创或传统龋齿治疗的家长进行访谈。所有访谈都被记录下来,逐字抄录,并用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:产生了四个主题:(1)“避免不必要的不适和痛苦”描述了父母对非侵入性和微创性龋齿管理策略的看法和经验,这些策略对他们的孩子和他们自己的身体和心理创伤较小;(2)“优先考虑治疗质量”,探讨家长对不同牙科治疗方案所能提供的质量的期望和优先考虑;(3)“信息的力量”,说明父母对非侵入性和微创性龋齿管理策略的认识有助于更好地理解治疗方法并促进选择,但需要获得这些信息;(4)“选择合适的选择”,描述了父母对牙科治疗有多种选择而不是单一选择的思考。结论:在考虑微创龋齿治疗时,家长重视有效的沟通、清晰的信息和可获得的治疗方案。他们的观点强调需要转向以患者为中心的护理模式,优先考虑儿童牙科的舒适、知情决策和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信