Propensity-matched comparison of proximal versus distal shunt insertion during eversion carotid endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Aleksandar Dimov, Maximilian Kreibich, Antoan Mihaylov, Andreas Harloff, Davide Turchino, Mario Lescan, Martin Czerny, Sam Brixius, Stoyan Kondov
{"title":"Propensity-matched comparison of proximal versus distal shunt insertion during eversion carotid endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.","authors":"Aleksandar Dimov, Maximilian Kreibich, Antoan Mihaylov, Andreas Harloff, Davide Turchino, Mario Lescan, Martin Czerny, Sam Brixius, Stoyan Kondov","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the two intraoperative shunting techniques (proximal vs. distal) during eversion endarterectomy (EEA) of the internal carotid artery (ICA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients operated between January 2011 and December 2022 who received routine shunting of the ICA were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients undergoing selective shunting, patch angioplasty of the ICA, redo surgeries or surgery performed by a resident were excluded. Intraoperative shunt placement took place after completing the eversion of the ICA. The Patients were divided into two groups based on shunt placement technique: (i) distal shunting, where the shunt was firstly inserted into the ICA and then into the CCA, and (ii) proximal shunting, where the shunt was firstly inserted into the common carotid artery (CCA) and then into the ICA. Propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia, with regional cerebral oxygenation monitoring. The primary endpoint was the incidence of perioperative stroke and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 658 thrombendarteriectomies of the ICA using intraoperative shunt were performed during the study period. Proximal shunting was used in n=330 (50.2%) and distal shunting in n=328 (49.8%). Using the Propensity score matching 260 pairs were generated for analysis. The perioperative stroke rate was significantly higher in the proximal shunting group n=13(5%), compared to the distal shunting group n=4 (1.5%), (p<0.05). The overall in-hospital mortality incidence was 0.6% (n=3) (n= 2 in the proximal shunting group and n=1 in the distal shunting group (p=0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the setting of an elective shunting of the ICA during eversion endarterectomy, proximal first placement of the shunt may cause a higher incidence of perioperative stroke compared to distal first placement of the stunt. A distal first shunting strategy seems reasonable when performing EEA surgery to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the two intraoperative shunting techniques (proximal vs. distal) during eversion endarterectomy (EEA) of the internal carotid artery (ICA).

Methods: All patients operated between January 2011 and December 2022 who received routine shunting of the ICA were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients undergoing selective shunting, patch angioplasty of the ICA, redo surgeries or surgery performed by a resident were excluded. Intraoperative shunt placement took place after completing the eversion of the ICA. The Patients were divided into two groups based on shunt placement technique: (i) distal shunting, where the shunt was firstly inserted into the ICA and then into the CCA, and (ii) proximal shunting, where the shunt was firstly inserted into the common carotid artery (CCA) and then into the ICA. Propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia, with regional cerebral oxygenation monitoring. The primary endpoint was the incidence of perioperative stroke and in-hospital mortality.

Results: A total of 658 thrombendarteriectomies of the ICA using intraoperative shunt were performed during the study period. Proximal shunting was used in n=330 (50.2%) and distal shunting in n=328 (49.8%). Using the Propensity score matching 260 pairs were generated for analysis. The perioperative stroke rate was significantly higher in the proximal shunting group n=13(5%), compared to the distal shunting group n=4 (1.5%), (p<0.05). The overall in-hospital mortality incidence was 0.6% (n=3) (n= 2 in the proximal shunting group and n=1 in the distal shunting group (p=0.99).

Conclusion: In the setting of an elective shunting of the ICA during eversion endarterectomy, proximal first placement of the shunt may cause a higher incidence of perioperative stroke compared to distal first placement of the stunt. A distal first shunting strategy seems reasonable when performing EEA surgery to improve patient outcomes.

有症状和无症状患者颈内动脉外翻切除术中近端和远端分流器插入的倾向匹配比较。
目的:本研究的目的是比较内颈动脉(ICA)外翻动脉内膜切除术(EEA)中两种术中分流技术(近端和远端)。方法:所有2011年1月至2022年12月接受ICA常规分流手术的患者纳入本回顾性研究。接受选择性分流、ICA补片血管成形术、重做手术或住院医师进行手术的患者被排除在外。术中分流放置是在完成ICA的旋转后进行的。根据分流器放置技术将患者分为两组:(i)远端分流,分流器首先插入颈总动脉,然后进入CCA; (ii)近端分流,分流器首先插入颈总动脉(CCA),然后进入ICA。采用倾向评分匹配法对两组进行比较。所有手术均在全身麻醉下进行,并伴有局部脑氧合监测。主要终点是围手术期卒中发生率和住院死亡率。结果:在研究期间,共采用术中分流术进行了658例ICA血栓动脉内膜切除术。近端分流n=330(50.2%),远端分流n=328(49.8%)。使用倾向性评分生成260对配对进行分析。与远端分流组n=4(1.5%)相比,近端分流组n=13(5%)的围手术期卒中发生率显著高于远端分流组n=4(1.5%)。(结论:在外翻动脉内膜切除术中选择性分流ICA的情况下,与远端分流器首次放置相比,近端分流器首次放置可能导致更高的围手术期卒中发生率。在进行EEA手术以改善患者预后时,远端第一分流策略似乎是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信