Molecular and pharmacodynamic insights into β-lactam therapy for high-inoculum Enterobacter cloacae complex infections.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Rachel Gray, Elizabeth May, Hunter Curry, Nicole Slain, Chris Delcher, Eugene Shin
{"title":"Molecular and pharmacodynamic insights into β-lactam therapy for high-inoculum <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> complex infections.","authors":"Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Rachel Gray, Elizabeth May, Hunter Curry, Nicole Slain, Chris Delcher, Eugene Shin","doi":"10.1128/aac.01170-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-inoculum <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i> complex (ECC) infections challenge β-lactam therapy due to β-lactamase-mediated resistance and the inoculum effect, where high bacterial densities amplify resistance and worsen outcomes. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic efficacy of cefepime, meropenem, ertapenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam against three high-inoculum (10⁹ colony-forming unit [CFU]/g) ECC isolates (0008, 0032, and 0060) harboring diverse β-lactamases using a 96 h simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) model with humanized exposures. Bactericidal activity, resistance emergence, and β-lactamase expression were assessed. Cefepime failed in all isolates, with SEV growth from +0.4 to +1.6 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) increasing from 2-8 µg/mL to >64  µg/mL in 0008, 0032, and 0060, coinciding with AmpC β-lactamase (ACT) induction up to 16.1-fold (0032). In 0060, cefepime failed, whereas meropenem displayed infusion-dependent efficacy: the 3 h infusion achieved bactericidal killing (-4.6 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), while the 30 min infusion produced partial killing (-2.9 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). Meropenem failed in 0032 (+1.1 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), with ACT-16 induction reaching 14.6-fold. Ertapenem produced initial bactericidal activity in 0060 (-3.2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) but regrowth to -1.9 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g by 96 h, accompanied by ACT-89 expression rising 26-fold. Meropenem-vaborbactam was bactericidal in 0008 (-4.6 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) and 0032 (-3.6 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) with stable MICs and minimal β-lactamase induction. Ceftazidime-avibactam achieved bactericidal activity in 0008 (-4.9 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) but only bacteriostatic activity in 0032 (-1.2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), with modest KPC-3 and ACT-16 upregulation (~1.7- to 2.3-fold). β-Lactamase diversity and inoculum effects limit β-lactam efficacy in high-inoculum ECC infections. Meropenem-vaborbactam showed consistent activity, and prolonged meropenem infusion benefited select isolates. Variable ceftazidime-avibactam efficacy reinforces aligning β-lactam selection with underlying β-lactamase mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0117025"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01170-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-inoculum Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) infections challenge β-lactam therapy due to β-lactamase-mediated resistance and the inoculum effect, where high bacterial densities amplify resistance and worsen outcomes. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic efficacy of cefepime, meropenem, ertapenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam against three high-inoculum (10⁹ colony-forming unit [CFU]/g) ECC isolates (0008, 0032, and 0060) harboring diverse β-lactamases using a 96 h simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) model with humanized exposures. Bactericidal activity, resistance emergence, and β-lactamase expression were assessed. Cefepime failed in all isolates, with SEV growth from +0.4 to +1.6 log10 CFU/g and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) increasing from 2-8 µg/mL to >64  µg/mL in 0008, 0032, and 0060, coinciding with AmpC β-lactamase (ACT) induction up to 16.1-fold (0032). In 0060, cefepime failed, whereas meropenem displayed infusion-dependent efficacy: the 3 h infusion achieved bactericidal killing (-4.6 log10 CFU/g), while the 30 min infusion produced partial killing (-2.9 log10 CFU/g). Meropenem failed in 0032 (+1.1 log10 CFU/g), with ACT-16 induction reaching 14.6-fold. Ertapenem produced initial bactericidal activity in 0060 (-3.2 log10 CFU/g) but regrowth to -1.9 log10 CFU/g by 96 h, accompanied by ACT-89 expression rising 26-fold. Meropenem-vaborbactam was bactericidal in 0008 (-4.6 log10 CFU/g) and 0032 (-3.6 log10 CFU/g) with stable MICs and minimal β-lactamase induction. Ceftazidime-avibactam achieved bactericidal activity in 0008 (-4.9 log10 CFU/g) but only bacteriostatic activity in 0032 (-1.2 log10 CFU/g), with modest KPC-3 and ACT-16 upregulation (~1.7- to 2.3-fold). β-Lactamase diversity and inoculum effects limit β-lactam efficacy in high-inoculum ECC infections. Meropenem-vaborbactam showed consistent activity, and prolonged meropenem infusion benefited select isolates. Variable ceftazidime-avibactam efficacy reinforces aligning β-lactam selection with underlying β-lactamase mechanisms.

β-内酰胺治疗高接种量阴沟肠杆菌复合感染的分子和药效学研究。
由于β-内酰胺酶介导的耐药性和接种效应,高接种量阴沟肠杆菌复合体(ECC)感染挑战β-内酰胺治疗,其中高细菌密度放大耐药性并恶化预后。采用96 h模拟心内膜植被(SEV)模型,评估了头孢吡肟、美罗培南、厄他培南、美罗培南-瓦波巴坦和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦对三种高接种量(10⁹菌落形成单位[CFU]/g) ECC分离株(0008、0032和0060)具有多种β-内酰胺酶的药效。评估了杀菌活性、耐药性的出现和β-内酰胺酶的表达。头孢吡嗪在所有分离株中均失败,SEV从+0.4增长到+1.6 log10 CFU/g,最低抑制浓度(mic)在0008、0032和0060从2-8µg/mL增加到bbb64 µg/mL,与AmpC β-内酰胺酶(ACT)诱导高达16.1倍(0032)一致。0060年,头孢吡肟失败,而美罗培南表现出输注依赖的效果:输注3小时达到杀菌杀灭(-4.6 log10 CFU/g),而输注30分钟产生部分杀灭(-2.9 log10 CFU/g)。0032时美罗培南失效(+1.1 log10 CFU/g), ACT-16诱导率达到14.6倍。Ertapenem在0060时产生初始杀菌活性(-3.2 log10 CFU/g),但在96 h后再生到-1.9 log10 CFU/g,同时ACT-89表达量上升26倍。美罗培尼-瓦波巴坦在0008 (-4.6 log10 CFU/g)和0032 (-3.6 log10 CFU/g)具有抑菌作用,mic稳定,β-内酰胺酶诱导最小。Ceftazidime-avibactam在0008达到了杀菌活性(-4.9 log10 CFU/g),但在0032只有抑菌活性(-1.2 log10 CFU/g), KPC-3和ACT-16适度上调(约1.7- 2.3倍)。β-内酰胺酶的多样性和接种量的影响限制了β-内酰胺在高接种量ECC感染中的疗效。美罗培南-瓦波巴坦表现出一致的活性,长时间输注美罗培南有利于选定的分离株。可变头孢他啶-阿维巴坦疗效加强了β-内酰胺选择与潜在β-内酰胺酶机制的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信