{"title":"Factors Influencing the Availability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Japan","authors":"Satoshi Kuhara, Ryutaro Matsugaki, Hideaki Itoh, Yasushi Oginosawa, Kiyohide Fushimi, Shinya Matsuda, Satoru Saeki","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the implementation rate of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), as well as the associated factors, using real-world data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the Diagnostic Procedure Combination System in Japan (2014–2018) was analyzed. The participants were cardiac patients who underwent CRT or CRT-D device implantation (<i>n</i> = 3859). The primary outcome was whether CPET was performed after device implantation. Unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the characteristics of the CPET (+) and CPET (−) groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with CPET performance. CPET was performed in 134 patients (3%). The CPET (−) group was older and had lower Barthel Index (BI) scores at discharge. CPET (+) patients had a higher rate of cardiac rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis revealed that age < 70 years and BI score ≥ 85 at discharge were associated with CPET implementation. In-hospital cardiac rehabilitation is also an important determinant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The CPET implementation after CRT or CRT-D was low. Emphasizing the importance of CPET may improve these rates. Future studies should explore strategies to increase its use in this patient population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70198","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to investigate the implementation rate of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), as well as the associated factors, using real-world data.
Methods and Results
Data from the Diagnostic Procedure Combination System in Japan (2014–2018) was analyzed. The participants were cardiac patients who underwent CRT or CRT-D device implantation (n = 3859). The primary outcome was whether CPET was performed after device implantation. Unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the characteristics of the CPET (+) and CPET (−) groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with CPET performance. CPET was performed in 134 patients (3%). The CPET (−) group was older and had lower Barthel Index (BI) scores at discharge. CPET (+) patients had a higher rate of cardiac rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis revealed that age < 70 years and BI score ≥ 85 at discharge were associated with CPET implementation. In-hospital cardiac rehabilitation is also an important determinant.
Conclusions
The CPET implementation after CRT or CRT-D was low. Emphasizing the importance of CPET may improve these rates. Future studies should explore strategies to increase its use in this patient population.