Power Spectra of Physics-Based and Data-Driven Ensembles

IF 2.5 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Mark J. Rodwell, Mariana C. A. Clare, Sarah-Jane Lock, Katrin Lonitz, Matthieu Chevallier
{"title":"Power Spectra of Physics-Based and Data-Driven Ensembles","authors":"Mark J. Rodwell,&nbsp;Mariana C. A. Clare,&nbsp;Sarah-Jane Lock,&nbsp;Katrin Lonitz,&nbsp;Matthieu Chevallier","doi":"10.1002/met.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Power spectra are evaluated for a range of ensemble systems run at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). These spectra allow us to chart and compare the spatial–temporal evolution of ensemble spread and error, and to evaluate the impact of model and observational changes. We investigate whether differences between spread and error indicate issues of reliability or other deficiencies. In agreement with previous studies, for ensembles made with the physics-based model, extratropical variances (of 250 hPa geopotential height) saturate quickly at small scales, while planetary scale errors are far from saturated at day 10. At intermediate lead-times, forecasts are over-dispersive at synoptic scales. Tropical errors (for 200 hPa velocity potential) grow most rapidly over the first day, but are not fully saturated even by day 40. Tropical differences between spread and error at scales below 500 km are thought to reflect a need for more observations of tropical (divergent) winds, rather than a lack of reliability. Forecast variances in a “near perfect twin” ensemble suggest there is the potential to improve predictive skill by 5 days. Error variances highlight the substantial observational and modeling developments required to ensure that such forecasts are reliable. The impact of a recent system upgrade (which includes a change to the formulation of model uncertainty) and results from an experiment where additional radio occultation observations are assimilated, demonstrate that progress can be made when developments are focused on synoptic scale uncertainty and error-growth. Power spectra for two prototype data-driven ensembles show similar spatial–temporal evolution at large scales to that of the physics-based model; one has better overall reliability, and the other has reduced error. At smaller scales, the prototypes display a tendency for small-scale forecast variance and error to increase with lead-time beyond their theoretical limits. With the speed and breadth of ensemble development, these results illustrate the potential utility of power spectra diagnostics for comparing and developing ensemble systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"32 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Power spectra are evaluated for a range of ensemble systems run at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). These spectra allow us to chart and compare the spatial–temporal evolution of ensemble spread and error, and to evaluate the impact of model and observational changes. We investigate whether differences between spread and error indicate issues of reliability or other deficiencies. In agreement with previous studies, for ensembles made with the physics-based model, extratropical variances (of 250 hPa geopotential height) saturate quickly at small scales, while planetary scale errors are far from saturated at day 10. At intermediate lead-times, forecasts are over-dispersive at synoptic scales. Tropical errors (for 200 hPa velocity potential) grow most rapidly over the first day, but are not fully saturated even by day 40. Tropical differences between spread and error at scales below 500 km are thought to reflect a need for more observations of tropical (divergent) winds, rather than a lack of reliability. Forecast variances in a “near perfect twin” ensemble suggest there is the potential to improve predictive skill by 5 days. Error variances highlight the substantial observational and modeling developments required to ensure that such forecasts are reliable. The impact of a recent system upgrade (which includes a change to the formulation of model uncertainty) and results from an experiment where additional radio occultation observations are assimilated, demonstrate that progress can be made when developments are focused on synoptic scale uncertainty and error-growth. Power spectra for two prototype data-driven ensembles show similar spatial–temporal evolution at large scales to that of the physics-based model; one has better overall reliability, and the other has reduced error. At smaller scales, the prototypes display a tendency for small-scale forecast variance and error to increase with lead-time beyond their theoretical limits. With the speed and breadth of ensemble development, these results illustrate the potential utility of power spectra diagnostics for comparing and developing ensemble systems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于物理和数据驱动集成的功率谱
对欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)运行的一系列集合系统的功率谱进行了评估。这些光谱使我们能够绘制和比较集合扩展和误差的时空演变,并评估模式和观测变化的影响。我们调查是否差异的传播和误差表明问题的可靠性或其他缺陷。与先前的研究一致,对于基于物理模式的集合,温带差异(250 hPa位势高度)在小尺度上迅速饱和,而行星尺度误差在第10天远未饱和。在中间预期,天气预报在天气尺度上过于分散。热带误差(200 hPa速度势)在第一天增长最快,但即使在第40天也没有完全饱和。在500公里以下的尺度上,传播和误差之间的热带差异被认为反映了对热带(发散)风的更多观测的需要,而不是缺乏可靠性。“接近完美双胞胎”的预测差异表明,预测技能有可能提高5天。误差方差突出了确保这种预报可靠所需的大量观测和建模发展。最近系统升级的影响(包括改变模式不确定性的表述)和吸收了额外的无线电掩星观测结果的实验结果表明,当发展重点放在天气尺度不确定性和误差增长上时,可以取得进展。两个原型数据驱动系统的功率谱在大尺度上与基于物理模型的功率谱表现出相似的时空演化;一种具有更好的整体可靠性,另一种减少了错误。在较小的尺度上,原型显示出小规模预测方差和误差随交货时间超出其理论极限而增加的趋势。随着系综发展的速度和广度,这些结果说明了功率谱诊断在比较和发展系综系统方面的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meteorological Applications
Meteorological Applications 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Meteorological Applications is to serve the needs of applied meteorologists, forecasters and users of meteorological services by publishing papers on all aspects of meteorological science, including: applications of meteorological, climatological, analytical and forecasting data, and their socio-economic benefits; forecasting, warning and service delivery techniques and methods; weather hazards, their analysis and prediction; performance, verification and value of numerical models and forecasting services; practical applications of ocean and climate models; education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信