Joël Greffier , Isabelle Fitton , Fabien de Oliveira , Kim Diep Dang Tran , Jean-Paul Beregi , Cédric Croisille , Djamel Dabli , Claire Van Ngoc Ty
{"title":"Contribution of photon counting CT to the detectability of lung nodules using ultra-low dose CT protocols: a phantom study","authors":"Joël Greffier , Isabelle Fitton , Fabien de Oliveira , Kim Diep Dang Tran , Jean-Paul Beregi , Cédric Croisille , Djamel Dabli , Claire Van Ngoc Ty","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the image quality obtained with an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) and a photon-counting CT (PCCT) in ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocols for three patient morphology configurations.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>ULD-CT acquisitions were performed at Sn100 kV on PCCT and EID-CT using an image quality phantom. Different phantom sections were used to simulate standard, overweight and obese patients and the ULD levels were adapted to each section: 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mGy, respectively. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed to assess noise magnitude, noise texture and spatial resolution, respectively. Detectability indexes (d′) were computed to model the detection of a high-contrast solid nodule (HCN).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At all dose levels, noise magnitude values were significantly lower with PCCT than with EID-CT (−8.9 ± 0.4 %; p < 0.05). Values of average NPS spatial frequencies were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with PCCT (0.446 ± 0.010 mm<sup>−1</sup>) than with EID-CT mode (0.323 ± 0.011 mm<sup>−1</sup>). For the air insert, TTF values at 50 % were significantly lower for PCCT (0.719 ± 0.045 mm<sup>−1</sup>) than with EID-CT (0.916 ± 0.030 mm<sup>−1</sup>) at 1.6 mGy but similar for other dose levels (p < 0.05). For the simulated chest lesion, d′ values were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with PCCT than with EID-CT. The improvements in d′ values was 23.6 ± 5.5 % for HCN.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared with EID-CT, using PCCT makes it possible to reduce noise, improve noise texture and, above all, improve the detection of simulated high-contrast thoracic lesion in ULD CT protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 105180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972500290X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To compare the image quality obtained with an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) and a photon-counting CT (PCCT) in ultra-low dose (ULD) chest CT protocols for three patient morphology configurations.
Materials and methods
ULD-CT acquisitions were performed at Sn100 kV on PCCT and EID-CT using an image quality phantom. Different phantom sections were used to simulate standard, overweight and obese patients and the ULD levels were adapted to each section: 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mGy, respectively. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed to assess noise magnitude, noise texture and spatial resolution, respectively. Detectability indexes (d′) were computed to model the detection of a high-contrast solid nodule (HCN).
Results
At all dose levels, noise magnitude values were significantly lower with PCCT than with EID-CT (−8.9 ± 0.4 %; p < 0.05). Values of average NPS spatial frequencies were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with PCCT (0.446 ± 0.010 mm−1) than with EID-CT mode (0.323 ± 0.011 mm−1). For the air insert, TTF values at 50 % were significantly lower for PCCT (0.719 ± 0.045 mm−1) than with EID-CT (0.916 ± 0.030 mm−1) at 1.6 mGy but similar for other dose levels (p < 0.05). For the simulated chest lesion, d′ values were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with PCCT than with EID-CT. The improvements in d′ values was 23.6 ± 5.5 % for HCN.
Conclusion
Compared with EID-CT, using PCCT makes it possible to reduce noise, improve noise texture and, above all, improve the detection of simulated high-contrast thoracic lesion in ULD CT protocols.
期刊介绍:
Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics:
Medical Imaging
Radiation Therapy
Radiation Protection
Measuring Systems and Signal Processing
Education and training in Medical Physics
Professional issues in Medical Physics.