{"title":"Effective, fair or Intrusive? The role of futures consciousness in environmental policy acceptance","authors":"Sanna Ahvenharju , Fanny Lalot , Juulia Räikkönen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the current environmental crisis unfolds, there is an increasing call for stronger governmental action to accelerate societal transformation. The challenge lies in better identifying and understanding the factors that influence public acceptance of new environmental policies, particularly those targeting consumer behavior. Future orientation is recognized as one of the factors that motivate individuals to protect the environment and promote transformation towards biodiversity-respecting futures. This article examines whether individual differences in futures consciousness – a multicomponent conceptualization of future orientation with special emphasis on considering collective futures – translate into greater acceptance of consumer-targeted environmental policies. Two preregistered studies, one involving a convenience student sample from the UK (<em>N</em> = 266) and the other a representative sample of the Finnish population (<em>N</em> = 2005), explored respondents' futures consciousness and their perceptions of the effectiveness, fairness, intrusiveness, and their acceptance of selected pro-environmental policies. Results showed that futures consciousness was positively related to policy acceptance, and this effect was fully mediated by perceptions of policy effectiveness and fairness (Studies 1–2), but not intrusiveness (Study 2). These results highlight the potential role of futures education in tackling political divides and supporting transformation towards sustainable planetary futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102777"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002609","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the current environmental crisis unfolds, there is an increasing call for stronger governmental action to accelerate societal transformation. The challenge lies in better identifying and understanding the factors that influence public acceptance of new environmental policies, particularly those targeting consumer behavior. Future orientation is recognized as one of the factors that motivate individuals to protect the environment and promote transformation towards biodiversity-respecting futures. This article examines whether individual differences in futures consciousness – a multicomponent conceptualization of future orientation with special emphasis on considering collective futures – translate into greater acceptance of consumer-targeted environmental policies. Two preregistered studies, one involving a convenience student sample from the UK (N = 266) and the other a representative sample of the Finnish population (N = 2005), explored respondents' futures consciousness and their perceptions of the effectiveness, fairness, intrusiveness, and their acceptance of selected pro-environmental policies. Results showed that futures consciousness was positively related to policy acceptance, and this effect was fully mediated by perceptions of policy effectiveness and fairness (Studies 1–2), but not intrusiveness (Study 2). These results highlight the potential role of futures education in tackling political divides and supporting transformation towards sustainable planetary futures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space