Effective, fair or Intrusive? The role of futures consciousness in environmental policy acceptance

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sanna Ahvenharju , Fanny Lalot , Juulia Räikkönen
{"title":"Effective, fair or Intrusive? The role of futures consciousness in environmental policy acceptance","authors":"Sanna Ahvenharju ,&nbsp;Fanny Lalot ,&nbsp;Juulia Räikkönen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the current environmental crisis unfolds, there is an increasing call for stronger governmental action to accelerate societal transformation. The challenge lies in better identifying and understanding the factors that influence public acceptance of new environmental policies, particularly those targeting consumer behavior. Future orientation is recognized as one of the factors that motivate individuals to protect the environment and promote transformation towards biodiversity-respecting futures. This article examines whether individual differences in futures consciousness – a multicomponent conceptualization of future orientation with special emphasis on considering collective futures – translate into greater acceptance of consumer-targeted environmental policies. Two preregistered studies, one involving a convenience student sample from the UK (<em>N</em> = 266) and the other a representative sample of the Finnish population (<em>N</em> = 2005), explored respondents' futures consciousness and their perceptions of the effectiveness, fairness, intrusiveness, and their acceptance of selected pro-environmental policies. Results showed that futures consciousness was positively related to policy acceptance, and this effect was fully mediated by perceptions of policy effectiveness and fairness (Studies 1–2), but not intrusiveness (Study 2). These results highlight the potential role of futures education in tackling political divides and supporting transformation towards sustainable planetary futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102777"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002609","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the current environmental crisis unfolds, there is an increasing call for stronger governmental action to accelerate societal transformation. The challenge lies in better identifying and understanding the factors that influence public acceptance of new environmental policies, particularly those targeting consumer behavior. Future orientation is recognized as one of the factors that motivate individuals to protect the environment and promote transformation towards biodiversity-respecting futures. This article examines whether individual differences in futures consciousness – a multicomponent conceptualization of future orientation with special emphasis on considering collective futures – translate into greater acceptance of consumer-targeted environmental policies. Two preregistered studies, one involving a convenience student sample from the UK (N = 266) and the other a representative sample of the Finnish population (N = 2005), explored respondents' futures consciousness and their perceptions of the effectiveness, fairness, intrusiveness, and their acceptance of selected pro-environmental policies. Results showed that futures consciousness was positively related to policy acceptance, and this effect was fully mediated by perceptions of policy effectiveness and fairness (Studies 1–2), but not intrusiveness (Study 2). These results highlight the potential role of futures education in tackling political divides and supporting transformation towards sustainable planetary futures.
有效、公平还是侵扰?未来意识在环境政策接受中的作用
随着当前环境危机的展开,越来越多的人呼吁政府采取更强有力的行动来加速社会转型。挑战在于更好地查明和了解影响公众接受新的环境政策,特别是针对消费者行为的环境政策的因素。未来取向被认为是激励个人保护环境和促进向尊重生物多样性的未来转变的因素之一。本文考察了未来意识的个体差异——未来取向的多成分概念化,特别强调考虑集体未来——是否转化为对消费者为目标的环境政策的更大接受。两项预先注册的研究,一项涉及来自英国的便利学生样本(N = 266),另一项涉及芬兰人口的代表性样本(N = 2005),探讨了受访者的未来意识和他们对有效性、公平性、侵入性的看法,以及他们对选定的亲环境政策的接受程度。结果表明,未来意识与政策接受度呈正相关,且这种效应完全受政策有效性和公平性感知的中介作用(研究1-2),而不受干扰性的中介作用(研究2)。这些结果突出了未来教育在解决政治分歧和支持向可持续地球未来转型方面的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信