Neighborhood walkability and subsequent health and well-being in urban and rural Japan: An outcome-wide longitudinal study

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kenjiro Kawaguchi , Atsushi Nakagomi , Yu-Ru Chen , Katsunori Kondo , Masamichi Hanazato
{"title":"Neighborhood walkability and subsequent health and well-being in urban and rural Japan: An outcome-wide longitudinal study","authors":"Kenjiro Kawaguchi ,&nbsp;Atsushi Nakagomi ,&nbsp;Yu-Ru Chen ,&nbsp;Katsunori Kondo ,&nbsp;Masamichi Hanazato","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Walkability notably affects the health of older adults; however, its relationship with various outcomes in different geographical contexts remains unclear. Considering urban–rural differences, this study examined associations between neighborhood walkability and the health and well-being of older adults in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were obtained from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide cohort study of Japanese adults aged ≥65 years, across three waves (2013, 2016, and 2019). This study included 27,354 participants in the survey-based sample and 40,111 participants in the long-term care insurance-based sample. Neighborhood walkability was assessed using a composite index derived from population density, distance to retail and park areas, and road density. Forty-two outcomes across seven domains were analyzed using multilevel regression models stratified by urbanicity. Bonferroni correction was applied (α = 0.0012).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In urban settings, higher walkability was significantly associated with increased walking time. Conversely, in rural areas, higher walkability showed mixed results; it was significantly associated with increased participation in hobby/sports groups and outings, but also with increased risk of functional disability (level ≥2), increased sedentary behavior, and decreased norms of reciprocity. Walkability was not significantly associated with walking time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Walkability can have different effects on health and well-being in urban and rural areas, highlighting the need for location-specific strategies. While urban efforts could focus on pedestrian infrastructure, effective rural strategies would likely involve an integrated approach that addresses transportation, social connectivity, and activity promotion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49302,"journal":{"name":"Health & Place","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Place","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135382922500139X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Walkability notably affects the health of older adults; however, its relationship with various outcomes in different geographical contexts remains unclear. Considering urban–rural differences, this study examined associations between neighborhood walkability and the health and well-being of older adults in Japan.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide cohort study of Japanese adults aged ≥65 years, across three waves (2013, 2016, and 2019). This study included 27,354 participants in the survey-based sample and 40,111 participants in the long-term care insurance-based sample. Neighborhood walkability was assessed using a composite index derived from population density, distance to retail and park areas, and road density. Forty-two outcomes across seven domains were analyzed using multilevel regression models stratified by urbanicity. Bonferroni correction was applied (α = 0.0012).

Results

In urban settings, higher walkability was significantly associated with increased walking time. Conversely, in rural areas, higher walkability showed mixed results; it was significantly associated with increased participation in hobby/sports groups and outings, but also with increased risk of functional disability (level ≥2), increased sedentary behavior, and decreased norms of reciprocity. Walkability was not significantly associated with walking time.

Conclusions

Walkability can have different effects on health and well-being in urban and rural areas, highlighting the need for location-specific strategies. While urban efforts could focus on pedestrian infrastructure, effective rural strategies would likely involve an integrated approach that addresses transportation, social connectivity, and activity promotion.
日本城市和农村的邻里步行与随后的健康和福祉:一项结果广泛的纵向研究
步行能力对老年人健康影响显著;然而,其与不同地理背景下各种结果的关系尚不清楚。考虑到城乡差异,本研究调查了日本老年人的社区步行能力与健康和福祉之间的关系。方法数据来自日本老年学评估研究,这是一项针对≥65岁日本成年人的全国性队列研究,分三波(2013年、2016年和2019年)。本研究包括27,354名基于调查的样本和40,111名基于长期护理保险的样本。社区可步行性的评估采用了由人口密度、到零售和公园区域的距离以及道路密度得出的综合指数。利用城市化分层的多水平回归模型分析了7个领域的42个结果。采用Bonferroni校正(α = 0.0012)。结果在城市环境中,较高的步行适宜性与增加的步行时间显著相关。相反,在农村地区,更高的可步行性带来了不同的结果;它与爱好/运动团体和郊游的参与增加显著相关,但也与功能残疾风险增加(水平≥2)、久坐行为增加和互惠规范降低相关。可步行性与步行时间无显著相关。结论可持续性对城市和农村地区的健康和福祉有不同的影响,因此需要采取因地制宜的策略。虽然城市的努力可以集中在行人基础设施上,但有效的农村战略可能包括解决交通、社会联系和活动促进的综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health & Place
Health & Place PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
176
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: he journal is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of health and health care in which place or location matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信