{"title":"Neighborhood walkability and subsequent health and well-being in urban and rural Japan: An outcome-wide longitudinal study","authors":"Kenjiro Kawaguchi , Atsushi Nakagomi , Yu-Ru Chen , Katsunori Kondo , Masamichi Hanazato","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Walkability notably affects the health of older adults; however, its relationship with various outcomes in different geographical contexts remains unclear. Considering urban–rural differences, this study examined associations between neighborhood walkability and the health and well-being of older adults in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were obtained from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide cohort study of Japanese adults aged ≥65 years, across three waves (2013, 2016, and 2019). This study included 27,354 participants in the survey-based sample and 40,111 participants in the long-term care insurance-based sample. Neighborhood walkability was assessed using a composite index derived from population density, distance to retail and park areas, and road density. Forty-two outcomes across seven domains were analyzed using multilevel regression models stratified by urbanicity. Bonferroni correction was applied (α = 0.0012).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In urban settings, higher walkability was significantly associated with increased walking time. Conversely, in rural areas, higher walkability showed mixed results; it was significantly associated with increased participation in hobby/sports groups and outings, but also with increased risk of functional disability (level ≥2), increased sedentary behavior, and decreased norms of reciprocity. Walkability was not significantly associated with walking time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Walkability can have different effects on health and well-being in urban and rural areas, highlighting the need for location-specific strategies. While urban efforts could focus on pedestrian infrastructure, effective rural strategies would likely involve an integrated approach that addresses transportation, social connectivity, and activity promotion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49302,"journal":{"name":"Health & Place","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Place","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135382922500139X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Walkability notably affects the health of older adults; however, its relationship with various outcomes in different geographical contexts remains unclear. Considering urban–rural differences, this study examined associations between neighborhood walkability and the health and well-being of older adults in Japan.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide cohort study of Japanese adults aged ≥65 years, across three waves (2013, 2016, and 2019). This study included 27,354 participants in the survey-based sample and 40,111 participants in the long-term care insurance-based sample. Neighborhood walkability was assessed using a composite index derived from population density, distance to retail and park areas, and road density. Forty-two outcomes across seven domains were analyzed using multilevel regression models stratified by urbanicity. Bonferroni correction was applied (α = 0.0012).
Results
In urban settings, higher walkability was significantly associated with increased walking time. Conversely, in rural areas, higher walkability showed mixed results; it was significantly associated with increased participation in hobby/sports groups and outings, but also with increased risk of functional disability (level ≥2), increased sedentary behavior, and decreased norms of reciprocity. Walkability was not significantly associated with walking time.
Conclusions
Walkability can have different effects on health and well-being in urban and rural areas, highlighting the need for location-specific strategies. While urban efforts could focus on pedestrian infrastructure, effective rural strategies would likely involve an integrated approach that addresses transportation, social connectivity, and activity promotion.