Evaluation of ChatGPT’s responses to frequently asked questions about shoulder arthroplasty

Q2 Medicine
Fátima Fernández Dorado MD, Salvador Álvarez Villar MD, Carlos Alexi Osuna Mavare MD, Raquel Ruíz Díaz MD, Jorge Díaz Heredia MD, PhD, Miguel Ángel Ruiz Ibán MD, PhD
{"title":"Evaluation of ChatGPT’s responses to frequently asked questions about shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Fátima Fernández Dorado MD,&nbsp;Salvador Álvarez Villar MD,&nbsp;Carlos Alexi Osuna Mavare MD,&nbsp;Raquel Ruíz Díaz MD,&nbsp;Jorge Díaz Heredia MD, PhD,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Ruiz Ibán MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients now have access to numerous resources about common orthopedic procedures before clinical consultations. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have gained popularity, offering human-like, convincing responses. A prominent example is ChatGPT, an AI-based chat technology, which has seen rapid growth in acceptance. Given the increasing likelihood that patients will turn to this technology for educational information prior to undergoing surgical intervention, we aimed to determine ChatGPT’s ability to provide adequate answers to frequently asked questions about shoulder arthroplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After a literature review, we formulated the 10 most frequently asked questions about shoulder arthroplasty and presented them to the chatbot without follow-up questions or repetitions. The responses were analyzed by 15 independent shoulder surgeons, who evaluated each response for accuracy using an evidence-based approach. The responses were classified as “excellent response without need for clarification,” “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification,” or “unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.”</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the responses given by the chatbot, 45.5% of the time the expert panel rated the response as “excellent,” 38.2% of the time the rating was “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” and only 11.8% and 4.5% of the responses were rated as “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification” and “unsatisfactory,” respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ChatGPT provides reliable information to patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. As a complementary educational resource, AI shows potential by delivering accurate, evidence-based answers with little need for clarification and minimal bias. Despite limitations, the study underscores the promising role of AI-based platforms in healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 1771-1777"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325001689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients now have access to numerous resources about common orthopedic procedures before clinical consultations. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have gained popularity, offering human-like, convincing responses. A prominent example is ChatGPT, an AI-based chat technology, which has seen rapid growth in acceptance. Given the increasing likelihood that patients will turn to this technology for educational information prior to undergoing surgical intervention, we aimed to determine ChatGPT’s ability to provide adequate answers to frequently asked questions about shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

After a literature review, we formulated the 10 most frequently asked questions about shoulder arthroplasty and presented them to the chatbot without follow-up questions or repetitions. The responses were analyzed by 15 independent shoulder surgeons, who evaluated each response for accuracy using an evidence-based approach. The responses were classified as “excellent response without need for clarification,” “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification,” or “unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.”

Results

Of the responses given by the chatbot, 45.5% of the time the expert panel rated the response as “excellent,” 38.2% of the time the rating was “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” and only 11.8% and 4.5% of the responses were rated as “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification” and “unsatisfactory,” respectively.

Conclusion

ChatGPT provides reliable information to patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. As a complementary educational resource, AI shows potential by delivering accurate, evidence-based answers with little need for clarification and minimal bias. Despite limitations, the study underscores the promising role of AI-based platforms in healthcare.
评估ChatGPT对肩关节置换术常见问题的回答
在临床咨询之前,患者现在可以获得大量关于常见骨科手术的资源。最近,人工智能(AI)驱动的聊天机器人越来越受欢迎,它们能提供类似人类的、令人信服的回答。一个突出的例子是ChatGPT,一种基于人工智能的聊天技术,它的接受度迅速增长。考虑到越来越多的患者在接受手术干预前通过该技术获取教育信息的可能性,我们的目的是确定ChatGPT为有关肩关节置换术的常见问题提供足够答案的能力。方法通过文献回顾,我们制定了10个关于肩关节置换术最常见的问题,并将其呈现给聊天机器人,没有后续问题或重复。15名独立的肩部外科医生分析了这些反应,他们使用循证方法评估每个反应的准确性。回答被分类为“优秀的回答,无需澄清”,“满意的需要最少的澄清”,“满意的需要适度的澄清”,或“不满意的需要大量的澄清”。在聊天机器人给出的回答中,45.5%的时间专家组将回答评为“优秀”,38.2%的时间评级为“满意,需要最少的澄清”,分别只有11.8%和4.5%的回答被评为“满意,需要适度的澄清”和“不满意”。结论chatgpt为肩关节置换术患者提供了可靠的信息。作为一种补充教育资源,人工智能可以提供准确的、基于证据的答案,几乎不需要澄清,也不需要偏见,从而显示出潜力。尽管存在局限性,但该研究强调了基于人工智能的平台在医疗保健领域的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信