Repair integrity and clinical outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under low repair tension

Q2 Medicine
Satoshi Miyake MD, PhD, Terufumi Shibata MD, PhD, Shunsuke Kobayashi MD, Kei Matsunaga MD, Yozo Shibata MD, PhD, Teruaki Izaki MD, PhD, Takuaki Yamamoto MD, PhD
{"title":"Repair integrity and clinical outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under low repair tension","authors":"Satoshi Miyake MD, PhD,&nbsp;Terufumi Shibata MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shunsuke Kobayashi MD,&nbsp;Kei Matsunaga MD,&nbsp;Yozo Shibata MD, PhD,&nbsp;Teruaki Izaki MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takuaki Yamamoto MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Excessively high repair tension negatively affects clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. This study was performed to examine the clinical outcomes and repair integrity of the rotator cuff in patients treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) under low repair tension (&lt;10 N) (ie, low-tension ARCR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study involved patients who underwent low-tension ARCR between January 2020 and December 2021. The single-row or triple-row technique was used for low-tension ARCR. We excluded 10 patients who underwent other procedures, other types of repair, or partial repair, as well as 4 patients who underwent an ultrasound evaluation of cuff integrity. Clinical evaluations included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), and clinical scores (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] shoulder score, University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA] shoulder score, and simple shoulder test [SST]), assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Structural repair integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at 12 months postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistics Package for Social Science software (version 29.0.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare continuous and continuously ranked data (VAS score, ROM, JOA shoulder score, UCLA score, and SST score). A <em>P</em> value of &lt; .05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This retrospective case series involved 77 patients with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.5 years (range, 42-85 years) and a mean follow-up period of 25.3 ± 3.3 months (range, 24-38 months). All patients had a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, classified as small in 5 patients, medium in 47, large in 25, and massive in 0. The mean tear size was 506.0 ± 332.5 mm<sup>2</sup>. All patients underwent low-tension ARCR (single-row, n = 48; triple-row, n = 29). Repair tension was measured using a digital tensiometer. The VAS score at rest (48.6-1.1, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), in motion (75.2-5.4, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and at night (62.0-1.5, <em>P</em> &lt; .001); ROM with forward flexion (124°-167°, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), abduction (109°-167°, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), external rotation (56.0°-68.6°, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and internal rotation (14.1°-9.0°, <em>P</em> &lt; .001); JOA shoulder score (66.5-98.1, <em>P</em> &lt; .001); UCLA shoulder score (15.9-34.2, <em>P</em> &lt; .001); and SST score (4.5-10.7, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) were significantly better at the 2-year follow-up than before surgery. Two patients developed a retear (2.6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Low-tension ARCR resulted in a low retear rate and good clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 1493-1503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325001446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Excessively high repair tension negatively affects clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. This study was performed to examine the clinical outcomes and repair integrity of the rotator cuff in patients treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) under low repair tension (<10 N) (ie, low-tension ARCR).

Methods

The study involved patients who underwent low-tension ARCR between January 2020 and December 2021. The single-row or triple-row technique was used for low-tension ARCR. We excluded 10 patients who underwent other procedures, other types of repair, or partial repair, as well as 4 patients who underwent an ultrasound evaluation of cuff integrity. Clinical evaluations included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), and clinical scores (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] shoulder score, University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA] shoulder score, and simple shoulder test [SST]), assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Structural repair integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at 12 months postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistics Package for Social Science software (version 29.0.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare continuous and continuously ranked data (VAS score, ROM, JOA shoulder score, UCLA score, and SST score). A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

This retrospective case series involved 77 patients with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.5 years (range, 42-85 years) and a mean follow-up period of 25.3 ± 3.3 months (range, 24-38 months). All patients had a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, classified as small in 5 patients, medium in 47, large in 25, and massive in 0. The mean tear size was 506.0 ± 332.5 mm2. All patients underwent low-tension ARCR (single-row, n = 48; triple-row, n = 29). Repair tension was measured using a digital tensiometer. The VAS score at rest (48.6-1.1, P < .001), in motion (75.2-5.4, P < .001), and at night (62.0-1.5, P < .001); ROM with forward flexion (124°-167°, P < .001), abduction (109°-167°, P < .001), external rotation (56.0°-68.6°, P < .001), and internal rotation (14.1°-9.0°, P < .001); JOA shoulder score (66.5-98.1, P < .001); UCLA shoulder score (15.9-34.2, P < .001); and SST score (4.5-10.7, P < .001) were significantly better at the 2-year follow-up than before surgery. Two patients developed a retear (2.6%).

Conclusion

Low-tension ARCR resulted in a low retear rate and good clinical outcomes.
低张力下关节镜下肩袖修复术的修复完整性及临床效果
背景:过高的修复张力会对肩袖修复后的临床结果产生负面影响。本研究旨在检查低修复张力(<10 N)下接受关节镜下肩袖修复(ARCR)治疗的患者的临床结果和肩袖修复完整性。方法:该研究纳入了2020年1月至2021年12月期间接受低张力ARCR的患者。单排或三排技术用于低压ARCR。我们排除了10例接受其他手术、其他类型修复或部分修复的患者,以及4例接受超声评估袖带完整性的患者。临床评估包括术前和术后2年的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、活动范围(ROM)和临床评分(日本骨科协会[JOA]肩部评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校[UCLA]肩部评分和简单肩部测试[SST])。术后12个月通过磁共振成像评估结构修复的完整性。使用Statistics Package for Social Science软件(version 29.0.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)进行统计分析。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较连续和连续排序数据(VAS评分、ROM、JOA肩部评分、UCLA评分和SST评分)。P值为<; 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果回顾性病例系列共纳入77例患者,平均年龄65.9±9.5岁(42 ~ 85岁),平均随访时间25.3±3.3个月(24 ~ 38个月)。所有患者均有全层肩袖撕裂,5例为小撕裂,47例为中撕裂,25例为大撕裂,0例为大撕裂。平均撕裂大小为506.0±332.5 mm2。所有患者行低压ARCR(单排48例,三排29例)。修复张力用数字张力仪测量。休息时VAS评分(48.6-1.1,P < .001)、运动时评分(75.2-5.4,P < .001)、夜间评分(62.0-1.5,P < .001);ROM前屈(124°-167°,P < .001),外展(109°-167°,P < .001),外旋(56.0°-68.6°,P < .001),内旋(14.1°-9.0°,P < .001);JOA肩部评分(66.5 ~ 98.1,P < .001);UCLA肩部评分(15.9 ~ 34.2,P < .001);2年随访时SST评分(4.5 ~ 10.7,P < 0.001)明显优于术前。2例患者发生复发(2.6%)。结论低张力ARCR术后复发率低,临床效果好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信