Cooperative supervision of livestreaming e-commerce based on stochastic evolutionary game and overconfidence

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Xiaochao Wei , Qiping She
{"title":"Cooperative supervision of livestreaming e-commerce based on stochastic evolutionary game and overconfidence","authors":"Xiaochao Wei ,&nbsp;Qiping She","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of livestreaming e-commerce has been accompanied by an increasing number of misleading marketing behaviors (MIBs) that require adequate regulations. To reveal the impact of irrational behavior (overconfidence) and to explore effective supervision strategies tailored to different types of streamers. We have classified streamers into brand-affiliated streamers and professional streamers (including internet celebrity streamers and ordinary streamers), then four types overconfidence are identified and integrated into a stochastic evolutionary game framework to investigate the regulatory effectiveness. The findings indicate that platform overconfidence positively affects supervision, while overconfidence among streamers and consumers has the opposite effect. For brand-affiliate streamers, the reputation mechanism exerts the most significant regulatory influence and should be heightened; additionally, enhancing platform penalties proves effective in cases of streamer overconfidence, whereas reducing supervision costs works better in other scenarios. Regarding professional streamers, a combination of platform penalties and incentive mechanisms leads to more stable and effective regulatory outcomes, especially in cases of streamer or consumer overconfidence. Furthermore, for internet celebrity streamers, the reputation mechanism serves as a beneficial supplement; for ordinary streamers, reducing regulatory costs proves to be more effective. Therefore, this study provides insights for classified and tiered regulation policy formulation regarding livestreaming e-commerce and provides a new perspective for supervision research by integrating overconfidence and evolutionary games.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103049"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002398","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid development of livestreaming e-commerce has been accompanied by an increasing number of misleading marketing behaviors (MIBs) that require adequate regulations. To reveal the impact of irrational behavior (overconfidence) and to explore effective supervision strategies tailored to different types of streamers. We have classified streamers into brand-affiliated streamers and professional streamers (including internet celebrity streamers and ordinary streamers), then four types overconfidence are identified and integrated into a stochastic evolutionary game framework to investigate the regulatory effectiveness. The findings indicate that platform overconfidence positively affects supervision, while overconfidence among streamers and consumers has the opposite effect. For brand-affiliate streamers, the reputation mechanism exerts the most significant regulatory influence and should be heightened; additionally, enhancing platform penalties proves effective in cases of streamer overconfidence, whereas reducing supervision costs works better in other scenarios. Regarding professional streamers, a combination of platform penalties and incentive mechanisms leads to more stable and effective regulatory outcomes, especially in cases of streamer or consumer overconfidence. Furthermore, for internet celebrity streamers, the reputation mechanism serves as a beneficial supplement; for ordinary streamers, reducing regulatory costs proves to be more effective. Therefore, this study provides insights for classified and tiered regulation policy formulation regarding livestreaming e-commerce and provides a new perspective for supervision research by integrating overconfidence and evolutionary games.
基于随机进化博弈和过度自信的电商直播合作监管
伴随着直播电子商务的快速发展,越来越多的误导性营销行为(MIBs)需要适当的监管。揭示非理性行为(过度自信)的影响,探索针对不同类型主播的有效监管策略。我们将流媒体分为品牌关联流媒体和专业流媒体(包括网红流媒体和普通流媒体),然后识别四种类型的过度自信,并将其整合到随机进化博弈框架中,以研究监管有效性。研究结果表明,平台过度自信对监管有积极影响,而主播和消费者的过度自信对监管有相反的影响。对品牌关联流媒体而言,声誉机制的监管作用最为显著,应予以加强;此外,在主播过度自信的情况下,加强平台处罚被证明是有效的,而在其他情况下,降低监管成本效果更好。对于专业流媒体,平台惩罚和激励机制的结合可以带来更稳定和有效的监管结果,特别是在流媒体或消费者过度自信的情况下。此外,对于网红主播来说,声誉机制是一种有益的补充;对于普通的流媒体来说,降低监管成本被证明是更有效的。因此,本研究为网络直播电子商务的分类分级监管政策制定提供了思路,并将过度自信与进化博弈相结合,为监管研究提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信