Mariano Méndez-Suárez , Maja Ćukušić , Ivana Ninčević-Pašalić
{"title":"AI FoMO (fear of missing out) in the workplace","authors":"Mariano Méndez-Suárez , Maja Ćukušić , Ivana Ninčević-Pašalić","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While AI is credited with improving productivity, automating repetitive tasks, and fostering safer work environments, it also raises employee concerns about job security, reduced autonomy, and the perceived obsolescence of their skills. This study focuses on the fear of being left behind, or fear of missing out (FoMO), to understand employees' perceptions of AI adoption. Using data from the latest OECD study on AI in the workplace, specifically focusing on workers who had been using AI over an extended period of time, this article applies Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine the relationships between employee control over decision making, mental health impacts, concerns about AI oversight (“robo-boss”), and skill devaluation. Results reveal multiple causal pathways to FoMO, where combinations of perceived skill devaluation, lost autonomy, and concerns over AI supervision are key drivers of this anxiety. As the study reveals, employees who perceive AI to reduce their decision-making autonomy are significantly more likely to experience FoMO, amplifying the psychological impact of automation on job anxiety. Conversely, positive perceptions of AI's role in supporting well-being and maintaining decision-making authority mitigate FoMO. The study highlights the importance of promoting transparent communication, ongoing training, and inclusive AI implementation strategies to address emotional responses and improve workforce adaptability. To ensure a balanced transition to AI-enabled workplaces, organizations must integrate AI in a way that empowers employees, rather than exacerbating fears of obsolescence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103052"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While AI is credited with improving productivity, automating repetitive tasks, and fostering safer work environments, it also raises employee concerns about job security, reduced autonomy, and the perceived obsolescence of their skills. This study focuses on the fear of being left behind, or fear of missing out (FoMO), to understand employees' perceptions of AI adoption. Using data from the latest OECD study on AI in the workplace, specifically focusing on workers who had been using AI over an extended period of time, this article applies Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine the relationships between employee control over decision making, mental health impacts, concerns about AI oversight (“robo-boss”), and skill devaluation. Results reveal multiple causal pathways to FoMO, where combinations of perceived skill devaluation, lost autonomy, and concerns over AI supervision are key drivers of this anxiety. As the study reveals, employees who perceive AI to reduce their decision-making autonomy are significantly more likely to experience FoMO, amplifying the psychological impact of automation on job anxiety. Conversely, positive perceptions of AI's role in supporting well-being and maintaining decision-making authority mitigate FoMO. The study highlights the importance of promoting transparent communication, ongoing training, and inclusive AI implementation strategies to address emotional responses and improve workforce adaptability. To ensure a balanced transition to AI-enabled workplaces, organizations must integrate AI in a way that empowers employees, rather than exacerbating fears of obsolescence.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.