AI FoMO (fear of missing out) in the workplace

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Mariano Méndez-Suárez , Maja Ćukušić , Ivana Ninčević-Pašalić
{"title":"AI FoMO (fear of missing out) in the workplace","authors":"Mariano Méndez-Suárez ,&nbsp;Maja Ćukušić ,&nbsp;Ivana Ninčević-Pašalić","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While AI is credited with improving productivity, automating repetitive tasks, and fostering safer work environments, it also raises employee concerns about job security, reduced autonomy, and the perceived obsolescence of their skills. This study focuses on the fear of being left behind, or fear of missing out (FoMO), to understand employees' perceptions of AI adoption. Using data from the latest OECD study on AI in the workplace, specifically focusing on workers who had been using AI over an extended period of time, this article applies Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine the relationships between employee control over decision making, mental health impacts, concerns about AI oversight (“robo-boss”), and skill devaluation. Results reveal multiple causal pathways to FoMO, where combinations of perceived skill devaluation, lost autonomy, and concerns over AI supervision are key drivers of this anxiety. As the study reveals, employees who perceive AI to reduce their decision-making autonomy are significantly more likely to experience FoMO, amplifying the psychological impact of automation on job anxiety. Conversely, positive perceptions of AI's role in supporting well-being and maintaining decision-making authority mitigate FoMO. The study highlights the importance of promoting transparent communication, ongoing training, and inclusive AI implementation strategies to address emotional responses and improve workforce adaptability. To ensure a balanced transition to AI-enabled workplaces, organizations must integrate AI in a way that empowers employees, rather than exacerbating fears of obsolescence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103052"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While AI is credited with improving productivity, automating repetitive tasks, and fostering safer work environments, it also raises employee concerns about job security, reduced autonomy, and the perceived obsolescence of their skills. This study focuses on the fear of being left behind, or fear of missing out (FoMO), to understand employees' perceptions of AI adoption. Using data from the latest OECD study on AI in the workplace, specifically focusing on workers who had been using AI over an extended period of time, this article applies Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine the relationships between employee control over decision making, mental health impacts, concerns about AI oversight (“robo-boss”), and skill devaluation. Results reveal multiple causal pathways to FoMO, where combinations of perceived skill devaluation, lost autonomy, and concerns over AI supervision are key drivers of this anxiety. As the study reveals, employees who perceive AI to reduce their decision-making autonomy are significantly more likely to experience FoMO, amplifying the psychological impact of automation on job anxiety. Conversely, positive perceptions of AI's role in supporting well-being and maintaining decision-making authority mitigate FoMO. The study highlights the importance of promoting transparent communication, ongoing training, and inclusive AI implementation strategies to address emotional responses and improve workforce adaptability. To ensure a balanced transition to AI-enabled workplaces, organizations must integrate AI in a way that empowers employees, rather than exacerbating fears of obsolescence.
职场中的人工智能FoMO(害怕错过)
虽然人工智能被认为可以提高生产力、自动化重复性任务、营造更安全的工作环境,但它也引发了员工对工作保障、自主权降低以及他们的技能被认为过时的担忧。这项研究的重点是对被抛弃的恐惧,或对错过的恐惧(FoMO),以了解员工对人工智能采用的看法。本文利用经合组织关于工作场所人工智能的最新研究数据,特别关注长期使用人工智能的工人,应用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)来研究员工对决策的控制、心理健康影响、对人工智能监督(“机器人老板”)的担忧以及技能贬值之间的关系。研究结果揭示了FoMO的多种因果途径,其中感知技能贬值、失去自主权以及对人工智能监督的担忧是这种焦虑的关键驱动因素。正如研究显示的那样,那些认为人工智能会降低自己决策自主权的员工更有可能经历FoMO,放大了自动化对工作焦虑的心理影响。相反,对人工智能在支持福祉和维持决策权威方面的作用的积极看法会减轻FoMO。该研究强调了促进透明沟通、持续培训和包容性人工智能实施战略的重要性,以解决情绪反应和提高劳动力适应能力。为了确保平衡过渡到支持人工智能的工作场所,组织必须以一种赋予员工权力的方式整合人工智能,而不是加剧对过时的恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信