Uncertainty quantification for oxidative kinetic parameters in smoldering model with oxygen nonequilibrium concept

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Zeyang Song, Boyuan Dang, Renkun Dai
{"title":"Uncertainty quantification for oxidative kinetic parameters in smoldering model with oxygen nonequilibrium concept","authors":"Zeyang Song,&nbsp;Boyuan Dang,&nbsp;Renkun Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.114480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uncertainty quantification is very crucial for combustion models. Smoldering models have been questioned by large uncertainties resulting from the underlying multiphase and multiscale physics. The confidence for most of smoldering models has been unknown because their uncertainties have been rarely quantified. This work attempts to quantify the uncertainties of oxidative kinetic parameters in a newly developed smoldering model with oxygen nonequilibrium concept that has been demonstrated to successfully predict smoldering under a variety of conditions covering from propagation to extinction as well as from buoyancy-driven fires to applied smoldering engineering. The uncertainty quantification is comprehensively investigated by 135 models in total, which involves 15 sets of oxidative kinetic parameters with the <em>aleatory uncertainty</em> (Φ<sub>oxid</sub>) of TG-scale experiments ranging between 0.04 and 0.6 and three physic variables, i.e. Darcy flux (2.7 cm s<sup>-1</sup> – 21.2 cm s<sup>-1</sup>), fuel type (PSFs including bituminous coal and anthracite and CFIPM i.e., food waste in sand), and spread mode (forced reverse, forced forward and buoyancy-driven forward). Results show that the confidence for smoldering model with oxygen nonequilibrium concept is rather good with the model bias less than 0.25 if the <em>aleatory uncertainty</em> is smaller than 0.15. Particularly, the confidence is extremely good for forced reverse smoldering of bituminous coal since the model bias is always less than 0.25 even though the oxidative kinetic parameters’ uncertainty reaches as high as 0.57. Besides, the model confidence for CFIPM is better than PSFs as the fuel loads become less. With the oxygen nonequilibrium concept, the <em>apparent</em> kinetic parameters with Φ<sub>oxid</sub> &lt; 0.15 could achieve a rather low and acceptable bias of model prediction, which is beneficial to save enormous time and efforts by avoiding to seek the <em>intrinsic</em> kinetic parameters from a large high-dimensional space. Nevertheless, the model confidence decreases for large Darcy flux &gt; 20 cm s<sup>-1</sup>, forward spread, and buoyant effect. It is for the first time that the uncertainty quantification for input oxidative kinetic parameters optimized from TG-scale experiments is comprehensively investigated for smoldering models. This work elucidates the confidence of smoldering models with oxygen nonequilibrium concept and improves our understanding how the <em>aleatory uncertainty</em> induced by kinetic parameters’ optimization propagate in multiscale modelling for smoldering combustion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":280,"journal":{"name":"Combustion and Flame","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 114480"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combustion and Flame","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010218025005176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification is very crucial for combustion models. Smoldering models have been questioned by large uncertainties resulting from the underlying multiphase and multiscale physics. The confidence for most of smoldering models has been unknown because their uncertainties have been rarely quantified. This work attempts to quantify the uncertainties of oxidative kinetic parameters in a newly developed smoldering model with oxygen nonequilibrium concept that has been demonstrated to successfully predict smoldering under a variety of conditions covering from propagation to extinction as well as from buoyancy-driven fires to applied smoldering engineering. The uncertainty quantification is comprehensively investigated by 135 models in total, which involves 15 sets of oxidative kinetic parameters with the aleatory uncertaintyoxid) of TG-scale experiments ranging between 0.04 and 0.6 and three physic variables, i.e. Darcy flux (2.7 cm s-1 – 21.2 cm s-1), fuel type (PSFs including bituminous coal and anthracite and CFIPM i.e., food waste in sand), and spread mode (forced reverse, forced forward and buoyancy-driven forward). Results show that the confidence for smoldering model with oxygen nonequilibrium concept is rather good with the model bias less than 0.25 if the aleatory uncertainty is smaller than 0.15. Particularly, the confidence is extremely good for forced reverse smoldering of bituminous coal since the model bias is always less than 0.25 even though the oxidative kinetic parameters’ uncertainty reaches as high as 0.57. Besides, the model confidence for CFIPM is better than PSFs as the fuel loads become less. With the oxygen nonequilibrium concept, the apparent kinetic parameters with Φoxid < 0.15 could achieve a rather low and acceptable bias of model prediction, which is beneficial to save enormous time and efforts by avoiding to seek the intrinsic kinetic parameters from a large high-dimensional space. Nevertheless, the model confidence decreases for large Darcy flux > 20 cm s-1, forward spread, and buoyant effect. It is for the first time that the uncertainty quantification for input oxidative kinetic parameters optimized from TG-scale experiments is comprehensively investigated for smoldering models. This work elucidates the confidence of smoldering models with oxygen nonequilibrium concept and improves our understanding how the aleatory uncertainty induced by kinetic parameters’ optimization propagate in multiscale modelling for smoldering combustion.
含氧不平衡概念的阴燃模型氧化动力学参数的不确定度量化
不确定度的量化对于燃烧模型是至关重要的。由于潜在的多相和多尺度物理的巨大不确定性,阴燃模型受到了质疑。大多数阴燃模型的置信度是未知的,因为它们的不确定性很少被量化。这项工作试图量化氧不平衡概念下新开发的阴燃模型中氧化动力学参数的不确定性,该模型已被证明可以成功预测从传播到熄灭以及从浮力驱动的火灾到应用阴燃工程的各种条件下的阴燃。通过135个模型对不确定度进行了全面的量化研究,其中涉及15组氧化动力学参数,tg尺度实验的不确定度(Φoxid)在0.04 ~ 0.6之间,以及达西通量(2.7 cm s-1 ~ 21.2 cm s-1)、燃料类型(PSFs包括烟煤和无烟煤以及CFIPM即沙子中的食物垃圾)和扩散方式(强制反向、强制正向和浮力驱动正向)三个物理变量。结果表明,当不确定度小于0.15时,采用氧非平衡概念的阴燃模型置信度较好,模型偏差小于0.25。特别是对于烟煤的强制反阴燃,尽管氧化动力学参数的不确定性高达0.57,但模型偏差始终小于0.25,置信度极好。此外,随着燃料负荷的减小,CFIPM的模型置信度优于PSFs。采用氧非平衡概念,当表观动力学参数Φoxid <; 0.15时,模型预测偏差较低且可接受,有利于节省大量的时间和精力,避免从较大的高维空间中寻找内在动力学参数。然而,对于大达西通量>; 20cm s-1、正向扩散和浮力效应,模型置信度降低。本文首次对阴燃模型中tg尺度实验优化的输入氧化动力学参数的不确定度进行了全面的量化研究。本研究阐明了含氧不平衡概念的阴燃模型的置信度,并提高了我们对动力学参数优化引起的不确定性在阴燃多尺度模型中如何传播的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Combustion and Flame
Combustion and Flame 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
20.50%
发文量
631
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the journal is to publish high quality work from experimental, theoretical, and computational investigations on the fundamentals of combustion phenomena and closely allied matters. While submissions in all pertinent areas are welcomed, past and recent focus of the journal has been on: Development and validation of reaction kinetics, reduction of reaction mechanisms and modeling of combustion systems, including: Conventional, alternative and surrogate fuels; Pollutants; Particulate and aerosol formation and abatement; Heterogeneous processes. Experimental, theoretical, and computational studies of laminar and turbulent combustion phenomena, including: Premixed and non-premixed flames; Ignition and extinction phenomena; Flame propagation; Flame structure; Instabilities and swirl; Flame spread; Multi-phase reactants. Advances in diagnostic and computational methods in combustion, including: Measurement and simulation of scalar and vector properties; Novel techniques; State-of-the art applications. Fundamental investigations of combustion technologies and systems, including: Internal combustion engines; Gas turbines; Small- and large-scale stationary combustion and power generation; Catalytic combustion; Combustion synthesis; Combustion under extreme conditions; New concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信