Adaptation and validation of Spanish version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale in hospitalized patients: a psychometric study

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Juan Roldan-Merino , Carmen Jerez-Molina , Olga Mestres-Soler , Lucia Muñoz-Narbona , Montserrat Gutiérrez-Juarez , Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido , Jéssica Gutiérrez-Martínez , Jurema Lopez-Monreal , Clara Expósito-Guanter , Martí Boix-Coll , Lucia Peñarrubia-San-Florencio , Ramon Mir-Abellan
{"title":"Adaptation and validation of Spanish version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale in hospitalized patients: a psychometric study","authors":"Juan Roldan-Merino ,&nbsp;Carmen Jerez-Molina ,&nbsp;Olga Mestres-Soler ,&nbsp;Lucia Muñoz-Narbona ,&nbsp;Montserrat Gutiérrez-Juarez ,&nbsp;Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido ,&nbsp;Jéssica Gutiérrez-Martínez ,&nbsp;Jurema Lopez-Monreal ,&nbsp;Clara Expósito-Guanter ,&nbsp;Martí Boix-Coll ,&nbsp;Lucia Peñarrubia-San-Florencio ,&nbsp;Ramon Mir-Abellan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Maintaining dignity in hospitalized patients is fundamental in nursing care and healthcare quality. In Spain, there is no validated tool to quantitatively assess patient dignity during hospitalization. The Inpatient Dignity Scale has been developed and validated in other countries, but its cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in Spanish have not yet been conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To perform cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Inpatient Dignity Scale in Spanish, evaluating its factorial structure, reliability, and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A methodological study was conducted in two phases: (1) translation and cross-cultural adaptation following international standards, and (2) psychometric validation through confirmatory factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha (α) and McDonald's omega (Ω) coefficients. The sample included 553 hospitalized patients from four hospitals in Barcelona, Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the original four-factor structure of the Inpatient Dignity Scale, maintaining the dimensions of respect as a human being, respect for personal feelings and time, respect for privacy, and respect for autonomy. Model fit indices were adequate (χ²/df = 5.7 for expectations, 4.3 for satisfaction; CFI ≥ 0.90; RMSEA ≤ 0.08). Internal consistency was high across all dimensions (α ≥ 0.88, Ω ≥ 0.92), indicating robust reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Spanish version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale in Spanish is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing expectations and satisfaction with dignity in hospitalized patients. Its use can facilitate research on dignity in healthcare and contribute to improving patient-centered care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25001286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Maintaining dignity in hospitalized patients is fundamental in nursing care and healthcare quality. In Spain, there is no validated tool to quantitatively assess patient dignity during hospitalization. The Inpatient Dignity Scale has been developed and validated in other countries, but its cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in Spanish have not yet been conducted.

Objective

To perform cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Inpatient Dignity Scale in Spanish, evaluating its factorial structure, reliability, and validity.

Methods

A methodological study was conducted in two phases: (1) translation and cross-cultural adaptation following international standards, and (2) psychometric validation through confirmatory factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha (α) and McDonald's omega (Ω) coefficients. The sample included 553 hospitalized patients from four hospitals in Barcelona, Spain.

Results

The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the original four-factor structure of the Inpatient Dignity Scale, maintaining the dimensions of respect as a human being, respect for personal feelings and time, respect for privacy, and respect for autonomy. Model fit indices were adequate (χ²/df = 5.7 for expectations, 4.3 for satisfaction; CFI ≥ 0.90; RMSEA ≤ 0.08). Internal consistency was high across all dimensions (α ≥ 0.88, Ω ≥ 0.92), indicating robust reliability.

Conclusions

The Spanish version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale in Spanish is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing expectations and satisfaction with dignity in hospitalized patients. Its use can facilitate research on dignity in healthcare and contribute to improving patient-centered care.
西班牙语版住院病人尊严量表在住院病人中的适应与验证:一项心理测量学研究
背景维护住院病人的尊严是护理和医疗质量的基础。在西班牙,没有有效的工具来定量评估住院期间患者的尊严。住院病人尊严量表已在其他国家得到开发和验证,但其跨文化适应和西班牙语心理测量评估尚未开展。目的对西班牙语住院病人尊严量表进行跨文化适应和心理计量学验证,评估其析因结构、信度和效度。方法方法学研究分为两个阶段:(1)按照国际标准进行翻译和跨文化适应;(2)通过验证性因子分析进行心理测量验证,并使用Cronbach's alpha (α)和McDonald's omega (Ω)系数评估内部一致性。样本包括来自西班牙巴塞罗那四家医院的553名住院患者。结果验证性因子分析确认了住院病人尊严量表原有的四因子结构,保留了尊重作为人、尊重个人感情和时间、尊重隐私和尊重自主权的维度。模型拟合指数足够(期望值χ²/df = 5.7,满意度χ²/df = 4.3; CFI≥0.90;RMSEA≤0.08)。各维度的内部一致性较高(α≥0.88,Ω≥0.92),表明信度稳健。结论西班牙语版《住院病人尊严量表》是一种有效、可靠的评估住院病人尊严期望和满意度的工具。它的使用可以促进关于医疗保健尊严的研究,并有助于改善以病人为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信