Revisiting the proper motions of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars with Gaia DR3

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Hao Wu, Yang Huang, Huawei Zhang, Qikang Feng
{"title":"Revisiting the proper motions of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars with Gaia DR3","authors":"Hao Wu, Yang Huang, Huawei Zhang, Qikang Feng","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202555477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proper motions (PMs) of M31 and M33 are key to understanding the Local Group’s dynamical evolution. However, measurement discrepancies between <i>Gaia<i/> blue and red samples, regarding whether the transverse velocity is remarkable, introduce significant ambiguity. In this work, we remeasure the systemic PMs of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars from <i>Gaia<i/> Data Release 3. Clean disk tracers are selected via color–color diagrams, with foreground contaminants removed through kinematic and astrometric cuts. We identify the discrepancy in M31’s blue and red samples as arising from systematic differences between <i>Gaia<i/>’s five-parameter (5p) and six-parameter (6p) astrometric solutions. The 6p solution, applied to sources lacking accurate color information, relies on a pseudo-color approximation, leading to lower precision and larger uncertainties. Two key limitations of the 6p solution are: (1) degraded astrometric accuracy for very red sources (<i>G<i/><sub>BP<sub/> − <i>G<i/><sub>RP<sub/> > 2.6); (2) significant PM zero-point offsets. In our sample, red sources are dominated by the 6p solution, while blue sources include a substantial fraction of 5p sources; this mismatch drives the observed discrepancy. By excluding extreme red sources and calibrating PM zero-points separately for 5p and 6p sources using background quasars, we reduce the discrepancy, bringing blue and red measurements into agreement within 1<i>σ<i/>. We ultimately report the most robust <i>Gaia<i/>-based PMs using high-quality 5p sources. For M31, we obtain as yr<sup>−1<sup/>, consistent with, but more precise than, the HST result. For M33, we find that as yr<sup>−1<sup/>, which agrees with the VLBA measurement within 1.5<i>σ<i/>. These results support a first infall scenario for M33.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proper motions (PMs) of M31 and M33 are key to understanding the Local Group’s dynamical evolution. However, measurement discrepancies between Gaia blue and red samples, regarding whether the transverse velocity is remarkable, introduce significant ambiguity. In this work, we remeasure the systemic PMs of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars from Gaia Data Release 3. Clean disk tracers are selected via color–color diagrams, with foreground contaminants removed through kinematic and astrometric cuts. We identify the discrepancy in M31’s blue and red samples as arising from systematic differences between Gaia’s five-parameter (5p) and six-parameter (6p) astrometric solutions. The 6p solution, applied to sources lacking accurate color information, relies on a pseudo-color approximation, leading to lower precision and larger uncertainties. Two key limitations of the 6p solution are: (1) degraded astrometric accuracy for very red sources (GBP − GRP > 2.6); (2) significant PM zero-point offsets. In our sample, red sources are dominated by the 6p solution, while blue sources include a substantial fraction of 5p sources; this mismatch drives the observed discrepancy. By excluding extreme red sources and calibrating PM zero-points separately for 5p and 6p sources using background quasars, we reduce the discrepancy, bringing blue and red measurements into agreement within 1σ. We ultimately report the most robust Gaia-based PMs using high-quality 5p sources. For M31, we obtain as yr−1, consistent with, but more precise than, the HST result. For M33, we find that as yr−1, which agrees with the VLBA measurement within 1.5σ. These results support a first infall scenario for M33.
用盖亚DR3重游M31和M33超大质量恒星的正常运动
M31和M33的固有运动(pm)是理解本群动力学演化的关键。然而,盖亚蓝色和红色样本之间的测量差异,关于横向速度是否显著,引入了重大的模糊性。在这项工作中,我们使用来自盖亚数据发布3的大质量超巨星重新测量了M31和M33的系统pm。通过彩色图选择干净的磁盘示踪剂,通过运动学和天体测量切割去除前景污染物。我们确定M31的蓝色和红色样本的差异是由盖亚的五参数(5p)和六参数(6p)天体测量解决方案之间的系统差异引起的。6p解决方案适用于缺乏准确颜色信息的源,依赖于伪颜色近似,导致精度较低,不确定性较大。6p方案的两个关键限制是:(1)极红源(GBP - GRP > 2.6)的天体测量精度下降;(2)显著PM零点偏移。在我们的样本中,红色来源主要是6p溶液,而蓝色来源包括很大一部分5p源;这种不匹配导致了观察到的差异。通过排除极端红色源并使用背景类星体分别校准5p和6p源的PM零点,我们减少了差异,使蓝色和红色测量值在1σ范围内一致。我们最终使用高质量的5p资源报告最健壮的基于gaia的pm。对于M31,我们得到yr−1,与HST的结果一致,但比HST的结果更精确。对于M33,我们发现其为yr−1,这与VLBA测量值在1.5σ范围内一致。这些结果支持了M33第一次坠落的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信