{"title":"Noise reduction interventions in intensive care units: a systematic review","authors":"Eugene Han , Haeun Kang , Yeonsoo Jang","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to examine the impact of noise reduction interventions on objectively measured noise levels, as well as associated clinical and perceptual outcomes for patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in intensive care units (ICUs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) was conducted for studies published between January 2015 and December 2024. The review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines, and eligible studies were independently evaluated for quality assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the screened publications, 12 met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 2) and quasi-experimental studies (n = 10). Various interventions have been implemented to mitigate ICU noise, which are classified into three categories: patient-directed interventions (e.g., earplugs), environmental modifications (e.g., soundproofing), HCP-oriented interventions (e.g., education, behavioral changes), and multi-component interventions. The intervention period ranged from less than one day to four months. Outcome variables included noise level, sleep quality, physiological response, and HCP perception.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ICU noise reduction interventions showed variable effectiveness, with multi-component approaches to address multiple noise sources. While interventions reduced noise levels and improved patient outcomes, noise levels often remained above the World Health Organization (WHO) standards. Evaluations of effectiveness have primarily been short-term, limiting analysis of sustained effects. To create a more conducive ICU environment for both patients and HCPs, future studies should focus on long-term effectiveness and include well-designed RCTs to strengthen the evidence base for noise management.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>Implementing noise reduction interventions, including HCP education, environmental modifications, and multi-component approaches, can improve ICU patient care and HCP well-being. Healthcare organizations should prioritize sustainable noise management strategies and conduct ongoing monitoring to ensure long-term effectiveness in ICUs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 104234"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725002964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This systematic review aimed to examine the impact of noise reduction interventions on objectively measured noise levels, as well as associated clinical and perceptual outcomes for patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in intensive care units (ICUs).
Methods
A systematic search of six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) was conducted for studies published between January 2015 and December 2024. The review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines, and eligible studies were independently evaluated for quality assessment.
Results
Of the screened publications, 12 met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 2) and quasi-experimental studies (n = 10). Various interventions have been implemented to mitigate ICU noise, which are classified into three categories: patient-directed interventions (e.g., earplugs), environmental modifications (e.g., soundproofing), HCP-oriented interventions (e.g., education, behavioral changes), and multi-component interventions. The intervention period ranged from less than one day to four months. Outcome variables included noise level, sleep quality, physiological response, and HCP perception.
Conclusions
ICU noise reduction interventions showed variable effectiveness, with multi-component approaches to address multiple noise sources. While interventions reduced noise levels and improved patient outcomes, noise levels often remained above the World Health Organization (WHO) standards. Evaluations of effectiveness have primarily been short-term, limiting analysis of sustained effects. To create a more conducive ICU environment for both patients and HCPs, future studies should focus on long-term effectiveness and include well-designed RCTs to strengthen the evidence base for noise management.
Implications for clinical practice
Implementing noise reduction interventions, including HCP education, environmental modifications, and multi-component approaches, can improve ICU patient care and HCP well-being. Healthcare organizations should prioritize sustainable noise management strategies and conduct ongoing monitoring to ensure long-term effectiveness in ICUs.
期刊介绍:
The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.