{"title":"Optimizing intraoperative video for surgical training: a comparative study of three recording techniques in hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Mehmet Süleyman Abul, Ömer Faruk Sevim","doi":"10.1080/24699322.2025.2562871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-quality intraoperative video documentation is increasingly valued in surgery for its role in surgical evaluation, procedural archiving, and education. However, the comparative advantages of different recording methods have not been thoroughly examined. In this prospective, double-blinded study, 44 experienced orthopedic surgeons evaluated posterior total hip arthroplasty videos recorded using three techniques: a head-mounted camera, a light-handle-mounted camera, and an externally operated camera. All videos were captured by the same surgeon using standardized hardware and settings. Participants assessed video quality and educational value using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and chi-square testing. The light-handle-mounted camera received the highest mean scores across all five evaluation domains, including visual clarity, image stability, and overall quality (mean scores ranging from 6.91 to 7.98). Repeated measures ANOVA confirmed statistically significant differences among the three camera techniques for all five questions (<i>p</i> = 0.022-0.043). Post hoc analysis revealed that the light-handle-mounted camera significantly outperformed the head-mounted system (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for all comparisons), while the external camera also demonstrated superiority over the head-mounted method. Chi-square testing showed a significant difference in educational suitability ratings (Question 6), with the light-handle-mounted system receiving the highest percentage of affirmative responses (79.5%) compared to the head-mounted (50.0%) and external cameras (31.8%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The light-handle-mounted system offered the most balanced solution, providing stable, high-quality recordings without disrupting sterility or workflow. While head-mounted and external methods have niche applications, their practical limitations reduce their suitability for routine documentation in procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56051,"journal":{"name":"Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":"2562871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2025.2562871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High-quality intraoperative video documentation is increasingly valued in surgery for its role in surgical evaluation, procedural archiving, and education. However, the comparative advantages of different recording methods have not been thoroughly examined. In this prospective, double-blinded study, 44 experienced orthopedic surgeons evaluated posterior total hip arthroplasty videos recorded using three techniques: a head-mounted camera, a light-handle-mounted camera, and an externally operated camera. All videos were captured by the same surgeon using standardized hardware and settings. Participants assessed video quality and educational value using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and chi-square testing. The light-handle-mounted camera received the highest mean scores across all five evaluation domains, including visual clarity, image stability, and overall quality (mean scores ranging from 6.91 to 7.98). Repeated measures ANOVA confirmed statistically significant differences among the three camera techniques for all five questions (p = 0.022-0.043). Post hoc analysis revealed that the light-handle-mounted camera significantly outperformed the head-mounted system (p < 0.05 for all comparisons), while the external camera also demonstrated superiority over the head-mounted method. Chi-square testing showed a significant difference in educational suitability ratings (Question 6), with the light-handle-mounted system receiving the highest percentage of affirmative responses (79.5%) compared to the head-mounted (50.0%) and external cameras (31.8%) (p < 0.001). The light-handle-mounted system offered the most balanced solution, providing stable, high-quality recordings without disrupting sterility or workflow. While head-mounted and external methods have niche applications, their practical limitations reduce their suitability for routine documentation in procedures.
高质量的术中视频记录因其在手术评估、程序存档和教育中的作用而越来越受到重视。然而,不同记录方法的比较优势还没有得到彻底的检验。在这项前瞻性的双盲研究中,44名经验丰富的骨科医生评估了使用三种技术记录的后路全髋关节置换术视频:头戴式摄像机,轻型手柄摄像机和外部操作摄像机。所有的视频都是由同一位外科医生使用标准化的硬件和设置拍摄的。参与者使用结构化问卷评估视频质量和教育价值。数据分析采用方差分析和卡方检验。轻型手柄相机在视觉清晰度、图像稳定性和整体质量等五个评估领域的平均得分最高(平均得分从6.91到7.98)。重复测量方差分析证实三种摄影技术在所有五个问题上的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.022-0.043)。事后分析显示,轻型手柄相机明显优于头戴式系统(p p
期刊介绍:
omputer Assisted Surgery aims to improve patient care by advancing the utilization of computers during treatment; to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with the integration of advanced digital technologies into surgical practice; to disseminate clinical and basic research relevant to stereotactic surgery, minimal access surgery, endoscopy, and surgical robotics; to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between engineers and physicians in developing new concepts and applications; to educate clinicians about the principles and techniques of computer assisted surgery and therapeutics; and to serve the international scientific community as a medium for the transfer of new information relating to theory, research, and practice in biomedical imaging and the surgical specialties.
The scope of Computer Assisted Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotactic procedures, surgery guided by intraoperative ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, image guided focused irradiation, robotic surgery, and any therapeutic interventions performed with the use of digital imaging technology.