United States' anesthesia workdays in 2022–2023 – Implications for national workforce assessments

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Franklin Dexter MD PhD FASA , Richard H. Epstein MD FASA , Richard P. Dutton MD MBA
{"title":"United States' anesthesia workdays in 2022–2023 – Implications for national workforce assessments","authors":"Franklin Dexter MD PhD FASA ,&nbsp;Richard H. Epstein MD FASA ,&nbsp;Richard P. Dutton MD MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Over the decade from 2013 to 2023, the percentage increase in the number of anesthesia clinicians in the United States increased more than the percentage increase in the yearly number of cases involving an anesthesia clinician. A potential explanation is that the expansion of ambulatory surgery has increased anesthetizing locations on weekday mornings, thereby decreasing overall anesthetic hours per clinician. We tested this hypothesis using 2022–2023 data from the American Society of Anesthesiologist's National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry. We performed analyses comparable to those from our earlier studies using 2013 NACOR data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We studied <em>N</em> = 13,901,414 anesthetics, excluding labor epidurals. Cases' start and end dates and times were used to create categories, including regular workdays (Mondays – Fridays, excluding US federal holidays) and weekends (Saturdays – Sundays). Proportions of cases were estimated along with standard errors calculated among the 26 four-week periods. A similarity index compared pairwise, between regular workdays and weekends, the relative proportions of different anesthesia Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regular workdays accounted for 95.5 % of the total anesthetic minutes. Among regular workdays, the 8-h period of 7:30 AM to 3:29 PM had 82.9 % (0.1 %) of anesthesia minutes, significantly &gt;0.8 (i.e., ⅘, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). There were 61.2 % (0.1 %) of all anesthetic minutes completed on regular workdays and before 1:00 PM, significantly &gt;53.0 % (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), the percentage from 2013. There were 79.2 % (0.1 %) of all anesthetic minutes on regular workdays 7:30 AM to 3:29 PM, significantly &gt;70.3 % (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), from 2013. At least ⅔<sup>rd</sup> of anesthetic minutes, 67.9 % (0.1 %) were covered by the 6.5 h, 7:30 AM to 1:59 PM. More than half (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001) of the minutes were mornings: 51.6 % (0.1 %). There were 4.1 % (0.1 %) of case minutes on weekends, &lt;5.2 % (P &lt; .0001), the observed percentage in 2013. There was moderate similarity (0.511 [0.002]) between surgical procedure categories on regular workdays 7:30 AM to 3:29 PM and weekends, much &lt;0.8, the value expected if experience with the types of procedures performed on regular workdays matched those on weekends, and &lt; 0.55 (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), the estimate from 2013.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nationwide, anesthesia times on regular workdays sum to substantially less than 8 h and even less than in 2013. Demand for daily numbers of clinicians at the start of the regular workdays probably is a large contributor to perceived workforce shortages and ongoing institutional support. The small but significant changes for weekends suggest an increased rationale for the development of acute care anesthesiology teams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 111988"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Over the decade from 2013 to 2023, the percentage increase in the number of anesthesia clinicians in the United States increased more than the percentage increase in the yearly number of cases involving an anesthesia clinician. A potential explanation is that the expansion of ambulatory surgery has increased anesthetizing locations on weekday mornings, thereby decreasing overall anesthetic hours per clinician. We tested this hypothesis using 2022–2023 data from the American Society of Anesthesiologist's National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry. We performed analyses comparable to those from our earlier studies using 2013 NACOR data.

Methods

We studied N = 13,901,414 anesthetics, excluding labor epidurals. Cases' start and end dates and times were used to create categories, including regular workdays (Mondays – Fridays, excluding US federal holidays) and weekends (Saturdays – Sundays). Proportions of cases were estimated along with standard errors calculated among the 26 four-week periods. A similarity index compared pairwise, between regular workdays and weekends, the relative proportions of different anesthesia Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes.

Results

Regular workdays accounted for 95.5 % of the total anesthetic minutes. Among regular workdays, the 8-h period of 7:30 AM to 3:29 PM had 82.9 % (0.1 %) of anesthesia minutes, significantly >0.8 (i.e., ⅘, P < .0001). There were 61.2 % (0.1 %) of all anesthetic minutes completed on regular workdays and before 1:00 PM, significantly >53.0 % (P < .0001), the percentage from 2013. There were 79.2 % (0.1 %) of all anesthetic minutes on regular workdays 7:30 AM to 3:29 PM, significantly >70.3 % (P < .0001), from 2013. At least ⅔rd of anesthetic minutes, 67.9 % (0.1 %) were covered by the 6.5 h, 7:30 AM to 1:59 PM. More than half (P < .0001) of the minutes were mornings: 51.6 % (0.1 %). There were 4.1 % (0.1 %) of case minutes on weekends, <5.2 % (P < .0001), the observed percentage in 2013. There was moderate similarity (0.511 [0.002]) between surgical procedure categories on regular workdays 7:30 AM to 3:29 PM and weekends, much <0.8, the value expected if experience with the types of procedures performed on regular workdays matched those on weekends, and < 0.55 (P < .0001), the estimate from 2013.

Conclusions

Nationwide, anesthesia times on regular workdays sum to substantially less than 8 h and even less than in 2013. Demand for daily numbers of clinicians at the start of the regular workdays probably is a large contributor to perceived workforce shortages and ongoing institutional support. The small but significant changes for weekends suggest an increased rationale for the development of acute care anesthesiology teams.
2022-2023年美国麻醉工作日-对国家劳动力评估的影响
背景:从2013年到2023年的十年间,美国麻醉临床医生数量的增长百分比大于麻醉临床医生每年病例数量的增长百分比。一种可能的解释是,门诊手术的扩大增加了工作日早晨的麻醉位置,从而减少了每位临床医生的总麻醉时间。我们使用美国麻醉师学会国家麻醉临床结果登记处2022-2023年的数据验证了这一假设。我们使用2013年NACOR数据进行了与早期研究相当的分析。方法:我们研究了N = 13,901,414种麻醉药,不包括分娩硬膜外麻醉。案例的开始和结束日期和时间用于创建类别,包括正常工作日(周一至周五,不包括美国联邦假日)和周末(周六至周日)。估计病例的比例以及在26个四周期间计算的标准误差。相似指数两两比较,在正常工作日和周末,不同麻醉现行程序术语程序代码的相对比例。结果:正常工作日麻醉时间占麻醉总时间的95.5%。在正常工作日中,上午7:30至下午3:29的8 h麻醉分钟占82.9%(0.1%),而上午7:30至下午1:59的6.5 h麻醉分钟占18.8%(即53.0%),P < 70.3% (P < 0.03%), 67.9%(0.1%)。结论:在全国范围内,正常工作日麻醉时间总和基本少于8小时,甚至少于2013年。在正常工作日开始时,对每日临床医生人数的需求可能是造成劳动力短缺和持续的机构支持的主要原因。周末的变化虽小但意义重大,这表明急症护理麻醉学团队的发展有了更大的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信