Unexpected spatial aggregation between two species of hummingbirds and their inconsistent spatial interactions with native and exotic plants in an urban ecological reserve

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q1 ORNITHOLOGY
Ibis Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1111/ibi.13408
Gonzalo A. Ramírez-Cruz, Israel Solano-Zavaleta, J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega, P. Montserrat Vilchis-Domínguez, Mariana Palencia-Martínez
{"title":"Unexpected spatial aggregation between two species of hummingbirds and their inconsistent spatial interactions with native and exotic plants in an urban ecological reserve","authors":"Gonzalo A. Ramírez-Cruz,&nbsp;Israel Solano-Zavaleta,&nbsp;J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega,&nbsp;P. Montserrat Vilchis-Domínguez,&nbsp;Mariana Palencia-Martínez","doi":"10.1111/ibi.13408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hummingbirds play an important role as pollinators and are one of the primary examples of animal–plant coevolution. However, factors such as land-use change, urbanization, exotic species introductions and the disappearance of native plants can negatively affect the persistence of hummingbird populations. Thus, understanding the ecological factors that may favour their presence is essential for their effective conservation in urban areas. We conducted repeated surveys in a native scrubland reserve within Mexico City from 2015 to 2018, and used conditional two-species occupancy models to estimate a species interaction factor, and to analyse the effect of five native plants (<i>Agave salmiana</i>, <i>Echeveria gibbiflora</i>, <i>Opuntia lasiacantha</i>, <i>O. tomentosa</i> and <i>Wigandia urens</i>) and one exotic plant (<i>Leonotis nepetifolia</i>) on the occupancy probability of two hummingbirds: the Broad-billed Hummingbird (<i>Cynanthus latirostris</i>) and the Berylline Hummingbird (<i>Saucerottia beryllina</i>). Considering that both of the hummingbird species could be competing for similar resources, we also tested the effect of the presence of the Berylline Hummingbird on the occupancy of the Broad-billed Hummingbird, assuming its dominance based on larger body-size. We found evidence of positive spatial interactions between plants and hummingbirds, but we did not find these to be consistent throughout the 3 years of monitoring, which could indicate a modification of the original hummingbird–plant interaction networks resulting from urban disturbance. In addition, there were no negative spatial interactions between the two hummingbirds. Instead, we detected an aggregation of both species during two separate seasons, probably owing to one species using the other as a cue for profitable sites. Even though the populations of these two hummingbird species can thrive in an urban ecosystem, changes in spatial interactions might reflect alterations on the structure and functioning of a community. Therefore, we consider it crucial to continue studying their population dynamics and their implications for the conservation of urban hummingbirds.</p>","PeriodicalId":13254,"journal":{"name":"Ibis","volume":"167 4","pages":"927-944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ibi.13408","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibis","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hummingbirds play an important role as pollinators and are one of the primary examples of animal–plant coevolution. However, factors such as land-use change, urbanization, exotic species introductions and the disappearance of native plants can negatively affect the persistence of hummingbird populations. Thus, understanding the ecological factors that may favour their presence is essential for their effective conservation in urban areas. We conducted repeated surveys in a native scrubland reserve within Mexico City from 2015 to 2018, and used conditional two-species occupancy models to estimate a species interaction factor, and to analyse the effect of five native plants (Agave salmiana, Echeveria gibbiflora, Opuntia lasiacantha, O. tomentosa and Wigandia urens) and one exotic plant (Leonotis nepetifolia) on the occupancy probability of two hummingbirds: the Broad-billed Hummingbird (Cynanthus latirostris) and the Berylline Hummingbird (Saucerottia beryllina). Considering that both of the hummingbird species could be competing for similar resources, we also tested the effect of the presence of the Berylline Hummingbird on the occupancy of the Broad-billed Hummingbird, assuming its dominance based on larger body-size. We found evidence of positive spatial interactions between plants and hummingbirds, but we did not find these to be consistent throughout the 3 years of monitoring, which could indicate a modification of the original hummingbird–plant interaction networks resulting from urban disturbance. In addition, there were no negative spatial interactions between the two hummingbirds. Instead, we detected an aggregation of both species during two separate seasons, probably owing to one species using the other as a cue for profitable sites. Even though the populations of these two hummingbird species can thrive in an urban ecosystem, changes in spatial interactions might reflect alterations on the structure and functioning of a community. Therefore, we consider it crucial to continue studying their population dynamics and their implications for the conservation of urban hummingbirds.

Abstract Image

城市生态保护区两种蜂鸟的空间聚集及其与本地和外来植物不一致的空间相互作用
蜂鸟作为传粉者扮演着重要的角色,是动植物共同进化的主要例子之一。然而,土地利用变化、城市化、外来物种引入和本地植物消失等因素对蜂鸟种群的持久性产生负面影响。因此,了解可能有利于它们存在的生态因素对于在城市地区有效保护它们至关重要。2015 - 2018年,我们在墨西哥城的一个原生灌丛保护区进行了重复调查,采用条件双物种占用模型估算了物种相互作用因子,并分析了5种本地植物(龙龙花、赤竹、刺花、毛毛花和维甘菊)和1种外来植物(Leonotis nepetifolia)对2种蜂鸟占用概率的影响。宽嘴蜂鸟(Cynanthus latirostris)和绿线蜂鸟(Saucerottia beryllina)。考虑到这两种蜂鸟可能会竞争类似的资源,我们还测试了柏林蜂鸟的存在对宽嘴蜂鸟占有的影响,假设它的优势是基于更大的体型。我们发现了植物和蜂鸟之间积极的空间相互作用的证据,但在3年的监测中,我们没有发现这些相互作用是一致的,这可能表明由于城市干扰,原始的蜂鸟-植物相互作用网络发生了改变。此外,两种蜂鸟之间没有负空间相互作用。相反,我们在两个不同的季节发现了这两种物种的聚集,可能是因为一种物种将另一种物种作为有利可图的地点的线索。尽管这两种蜂鸟种群可以在城市生态系统中茁壮成长,但空间相互作用的变化可能反映了群落结构和功能的变化。因此,我们认为继续研究其种群动态及其对城市蜂鸟保护的意义至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ibis
Ibis 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IBIS publishes original papers, reviews, short communications and forum articles reflecting the forefront of international research activity in ornithological science, with special emphasis on the behaviour, ecology, evolution and conservation of birds. IBIS aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信