Emerging tools for the early detection of prostate cancer

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70081
Muhammad Haider, Jeffrey J. Leow, Tobias Nordström, Ashkan Mortezavi, Peter Albers, Rakesh Heer, Prabhakar Rajan
{"title":"Emerging tools for the early detection of prostate cancer","authors":"Muhammad Haider,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Leow,&nbsp;Tobias Nordström,&nbsp;Ashkan Mortezavi,&nbsp;Peter Albers,&nbsp;Rakesh Heer,&nbsp;Prabhakar Rajan","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men globally, with a rising incidence. Early detection through population-based screening by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing improves survival outcomes, at the expense of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant disease. Here, we explore emerging tools for more effective PCa early detection and evaluate their potential roles for PCa screening.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Key articles on emerging adjuncts and alternatives to PSA for PCa early detection were identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) remains the gold standard modality for identifying clinically significant PCa and has been evaluated for screening. Newer imaging strategies incorporating biparametric MRI (bpMRI) or multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) potentially offer similar accuracy to mpMRI. Saliva-derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) hold potential as a non-invasive screening tool to identify at-risk patient groups. Blood-based biomarker tests can improve risk stratification, reducing unnecessary biopsies while maintaining detection of clinically significant cancers compared to PSA alone. Urine-based biomarker tests have been examined for the early detection and risk stratification of clinically significant disease as adjuncts to PSA testing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PSA is commonly used to detect early PCa, but its lack of specificity and associated overdiagnosis risk has led to controversy over its use for population-based screening. Imaging modalities such as mpMRI have reduced detection of clinically insignificant PCa, and emerging cost-effective alternatives, such as bpMRI and mpUS, show promise. Molecular biomarkers and PRS for risk stratification may help target imaging-based early detection more effectively to at-risk populations. Prospective randomised clinical trials are urgently needed to evaluate the performance of different modalities for population-wide screening. Future developments may involve technologies such as artificial intelligence and diagnostic tests that incorporate circulating tumour markers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men globally, with a rising incidence. Early detection through population-based screening by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing improves survival outcomes, at the expense of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant disease. Here, we explore emerging tools for more effective PCa early detection and evaluate their potential roles for PCa screening.

Materials and Methods

Key articles on emerging adjuncts and alternatives to PSA for PCa early detection were identified.

Results

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) remains the gold standard modality for identifying clinically significant PCa and has been evaluated for screening. Newer imaging strategies incorporating biparametric MRI (bpMRI) or multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) potentially offer similar accuracy to mpMRI. Saliva-derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) hold potential as a non-invasive screening tool to identify at-risk patient groups. Blood-based biomarker tests can improve risk stratification, reducing unnecessary biopsies while maintaining detection of clinically significant cancers compared to PSA alone. Urine-based biomarker tests have been examined for the early detection and risk stratification of clinically significant disease as adjuncts to PSA testing.

Conclusion

PSA is commonly used to detect early PCa, but its lack of specificity and associated overdiagnosis risk has led to controversy over its use for population-based screening. Imaging modalities such as mpMRI have reduced detection of clinically insignificant PCa, and emerging cost-effective alternatives, such as bpMRI and mpUS, show promise. Molecular biomarkers and PRS for risk stratification may help target imaging-based early detection more effectively to at-risk populations. Prospective randomised clinical trials are urgently needed to evaluate the performance of different modalities for population-wide screening. Future developments may involve technologies such as artificial intelligence and diagnostic tests that incorporate circulating tumour markers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

早期发现前列腺癌的新工具
前列腺癌(PCa)是全球男性第二大常见癌症,发病率呈上升趋势。通过基于人群的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测筛查,早期发现可以改善生存结果,但代价是对临床无关紧要的疾病的过度诊断和过度治疗。在这里,我们探索了更有效的前列腺癌早期检测的新兴工具,并评估了它们在前列腺癌筛查中的潜在作用。材料和方法对前列腺癌早期诊断中PSA的辅助剂和替代方法进行综述。结果多参数MRI (mpMRI)仍然是鉴别临床意义的前列腺癌的金标准模式,并已被评估为筛查。新的成像策略包括双参数MRI (bpMRI)或多参数超声(mpUS),可能提供与mpMRI相似的准确性。唾液衍生的多基因风险评分(PRS)有潜力作为一种非侵入性筛查工具来识别高危患者群体。与单独的PSA相比,基于血液的生物标志物检测可以改善风险分层,减少不必要的活组织检查,同时保持对临床重要癌症的检测。基于尿液的生物标志物测试已被用于临床重要疾病的早期检测和风险分层,作为PSA检测的辅助手段。结论PSA常用于早期前列腺癌的检测,但其缺乏特异性和相关的过度诊断风险导致其用于基于人群的筛查存在争议。像mpMRI这样的成像方式减少了临床上不重要的前列腺癌的检测,而新兴的低成本替代方法,如bpMRI和mpUS,显示出了希望。分子生物标志物和PRS用于风险分层可能有助于更有效地针对高危人群进行基于成像的早期检测。目前迫切需要前瞻性随机临床试验来评估不同的全民筛查方式的效果。未来的发展可能涉及人工智能和包含循环肿瘤标志物的诊断测试等技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信