A Systematic Review of Cooperation in Multi-User Virtual Reality Learning Environments

IF 4.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Frank Wehrmann, Raphael Zender
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Cooperation in Multi-User Virtual Reality Learning Environments","authors":"Frank Wehrmann,&nbsp;Raphael Zender","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The role of virtual reality (VR) in education is increasing, which raises questions about VR learning in multi-user settings. While collaborative VR learning, characterised by shared goals and low division of labour, is well-researched, cooperative VR learning, which emphasises role differentiation and task interdependence, remains underexplored. This oversight is significant, as cooperation holds unique potential for education and inclusion by accommodating diverse learner abilities and perspectives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This paper explores diverse multi-user learning approaches in VR Learning Applications (VRLAs), emphasising cooperation over collaboration. It provides an overview of multi-user VRLAs, their user engagement types, target groups, subjects, availability, and educational theory integration. Distinguishing between cooperative, collaborative, and social engagement, it also identifies asymmetric cooperation in multi-user experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA framework, identifying VRLAs in educational settings which feature multi-user interactions. The review included 89 studies published since 2013, categorising VRLAs by interaction mode, symmetry, presence of a VR instructor, availability, and presence of didactic justification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Collaborative VR remains the dominant mode (44%), but cooperative VRLAs (37%) see growing adoption. Collaborative designs often rely on constructivist educational theory, while cooperative designs tend to leverage role specialisation to mirror real-world practices, particularly in vocational training and task-specific scenarios. However, 84% of VRLAs are inaccessible, limiting their broader application. Many studies lack robust didactic justifications, underscoring the need for clearer frameworks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The role of virtual reality (VR) in education is increasing, which raises questions about VR learning in multi-user settings. While collaborative VR learning, characterised by shared goals and low division of labour, is well-researched, cooperative VR learning, which emphasises role differentiation and task interdependence, remains underexplored. This oversight is significant, as cooperation holds unique potential for education and inclusion by accommodating diverse learner abilities and perspectives.

Objectives

This paper explores diverse multi-user learning approaches in VR Learning Applications (VRLAs), emphasising cooperation over collaboration. It provides an overview of multi-user VRLAs, their user engagement types, target groups, subjects, availability, and educational theory integration. Distinguishing between cooperative, collaborative, and social engagement, it also identifies asymmetric cooperation in multi-user experiences.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA framework, identifying VRLAs in educational settings which feature multi-user interactions. The review included 89 studies published since 2013, categorising VRLAs by interaction mode, symmetry, presence of a VR instructor, availability, and presence of didactic justification.

Results and Conclusions

Collaborative VR remains the dominant mode (44%), but cooperative VRLAs (37%) see growing adoption. Collaborative designs often rely on constructivist educational theory, while cooperative designs tend to leverage role specialisation to mirror real-world practices, particularly in vocational training and task-specific scenarios. However, 84% of VRLAs are inaccessible, limiting their broader application. Many studies lack robust didactic justifications, underscoring the need for clearer frameworks.

Abstract Image

多用户虚拟现实学习环境中合作的系统回顾
虚拟现实(VR)在教育中的作用越来越大,这就提出了在多用户环境下虚拟现实学习的问题。虽然以共同目标和低分工为特征的协作式虚拟现实学习已经得到了充分的研究,但强调角色区分和任务相互依存的协作式虚拟现实学习仍未得到充分的探索。这种疏忽非常重要,因为合作通过容纳不同学习者的能力和观点,在教育和包容方面具有独特的潜力。本文探讨了VR学习应用(VRLAs)中不同的多用户学习方法,强调合作而不是协作。它概述了多用户vrla、它们的用户参与类型、目标群体、主题、可用性和教育理论集成。它区分了合作、协作和社交参与,还识别了多用户体验中的不对称合作。方法使用PRISMA框架进行系统的文献综述,确定具有多用户交互特征的教育环境中的vrla。该综述包括自2013年以来发表的89项研究,根据交互模式、对称性、VR讲师的存在、可用性和是否存在教学理由对vrla进行分类。结果与结论:协作式虚拟现实仍然是主导模式(44%),但协作式虚拟现实las(37%)的采用率正在上升。协作设计通常依赖于建构主义教育理论,而协作设计倾向于利用角色专业化来反映现实世界的实践,特别是在职业培训和任务特定场景中。然而,84%的vrla是不可访问的,限制了它们的广泛应用。许多研究缺乏有力的教学理由,强调需要更清晰的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信