Novel Use of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding to Assess the Impacts of a Large-Scale Seismic Survey on Tropical Fish Communities

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Conrad W. Speed, Laurence Dugal, Mark G. Meekan, Matthew J. Birt, Miles Parsons, Dianne McLean, Brett Taylor, Robert D. McCauley, Jayson M. Semmens, Stephen J. Newman, Rebecca Fisher, Luke Thomas
{"title":"Novel Use of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding to Assess the Impacts of a Large-Scale Seismic Survey on Tropical Fish Communities","authors":"Conrad W. Speed,&nbsp;Laurence Dugal,&nbsp;Mark G. Meekan,&nbsp;Matthew J. Birt,&nbsp;Miles Parsons,&nbsp;Dianne McLean,&nbsp;Brett Taylor,&nbsp;Robert D. McCauley,&nbsp;Jayson M. Semmens,&nbsp;Stephen J. Newman,&nbsp;Rebecca Fisher,&nbsp;Luke Thomas","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become a widespread tool used by ecologists to monitor wildlife diversity, there have been few applications of the approach for impact assessments. Here we use eDNA collected in a before–after, control-impact (BACI) experimental design to determine if the noise produced by a large-scale seismic survey modified the fish community on a tropical shelf. We compared abundance estimates of fishes calculated using metrics that included eDNA counts and an eDNA index of relative abundance (a proportional metric) with estimates sampled using baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS). In total, we detected 102 different genera of fishes using the BRUVS and eDNA datasets combined, although there were more genera observed using BRUVS (<i>n</i> = 71) than with eDNA metabarcoding (<i>n</i> = 57). There was a weak positive relationship between the estimates of relative abundance sampled using BRUVS and eDNA counts when data from common genera were combined, although relationships at the genera level were inconsistent. We found no evidence of major change in the community structure of fishes at the high impact zone of the seismic survey compared to control zones. This result was confirmed using metrics across fish taxa within the BACI framework, suggesting no material impacts to species richness or abundance due to the seismic survey. The power to detect change in the fish community structure and abundance was high (99% probability) for detecting an 80% change in all metrics tested; however, it was considerably lower for detecting smaller changes. Our study highlights the utility and applicability of eDNA metabarcoding to assess point-source impacts on fish communities, particularly when used in parallel with other techniques such as BRUVS.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70190","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become a widespread tool used by ecologists to monitor wildlife diversity, there have been few applications of the approach for impact assessments. Here we use eDNA collected in a before–after, control-impact (BACI) experimental design to determine if the noise produced by a large-scale seismic survey modified the fish community on a tropical shelf. We compared abundance estimates of fishes calculated using metrics that included eDNA counts and an eDNA index of relative abundance (a proportional metric) with estimates sampled using baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS). In total, we detected 102 different genera of fishes using the BRUVS and eDNA datasets combined, although there were more genera observed using BRUVS (n = 71) than with eDNA metabarcoding (n = 57). There was a weak positive relationship between the estimates of relative abundance sampled using BRUVS and eDNA counts when data from common genera were combined, although relationships at the genera level were inconsistent. We found no evidence of major change in the community structure of fishes at the high impact zone of the seismic survey compared to control zones. This result was confirmed using metrics across fish taxa within the BACI framework, suggesting no material impacts to species richness or abundance due to the seismic survey. The power to detect change in the fish community structure and abundance was high (99% probability) for detecting an 80% change in all metrics tested; however, it was considerably lower for detecting smaller changes. Our study highlights the utility and applicability of eDNA metabarcoding to assess point-source impacts on fish communities, particularly when used in parallel with other techniques such as BRUVS.

Abstract Image

环境DNA元条形码的新应用评估大规模地震调查对热带鱼群落的影响
虽然环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码已经成为生态学家监测野生动物多样性的广泛工具,但在影响评估方面的应用很少。在这里,我们使用在前后控制影响(BACI)实验设计中收集的eDNA来确定大规模地震调查产生的噪音是否改变了热带大陆架上的鱼类群落。我们将使用eDNA计数和eDNA相对丰度指数(比例度量)计算的鱼类丰度估计值与使用诱饵远程水下视频站(BRUVS)采样的估计值进行了比较。我们总共使用BRUVS和eDNA数据集检测了102个不同的鱼类属,尽管使用BRUVS观察到的属(n = 71)比使用eDNA元条形码观察到的属(n = 57)更多。当合并来自普通属的数据时,使用BRUVS取样的相对丰度估计值与eDNA计数之间存在微弱的正相关,尽管属水平上的关系不一致。与对照区相比,地震调查的高影响区鱼类群落结构没有发生重大变化的证据。这一结果通过BACI框架内的鱼类分类指标得到了证实,表明地震调查对物种丰富度或丰度没有实质性影响。在所有测试指标中检测到80%的变化,检测鱼类群落结构和丰度变化的能力很高(99%的概率);然而,对于检测较小的变化,它要低得多。我们的研究强调了eDNA元条形码在评估点源对鱼类群落影响方面的实用性和适用性,特别是当与其他技术(如BRUVS)并行使用时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信