Carlos Daniel García-López, Paloma Barajas-Álvarez, Martín Esteban González-López, Frank J. Loge, Jürgen Mahlknecht, Carolina Senés-Guerrero, Misael Sebastián Gradilla-Hernández
{"title":"Evaluating sludge management strategies using wastewater treatment plant simulations and life cycle assessment","authors":"Carlos Daniel García-López, Paloma Barajas-Álvarez, Martín Esteban González-López, Frank J. Loge, Jürgen Mahlknecht, Carolina Senés-Guerrero, Misael Sebastián Gradilla-Hernández","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02375-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this study is to compare the environmental and energy performance of three sludge management scenarios at a wastewater treatment plant in Mexico, using process simulations and life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess energy use, environmental impacts, and costs. The functional unit is one cubic meter of treated influent wastewater, including sludge treatment and disposal. Screw press, thermal drying, and anaerobic digestion (AD) were assessed for energy use and environmental impacts, focusing on global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and fossil resource scarcity. The Base Case scenario assumes a 50/50 distribution of wastewater flow between two biological treatment lines (anoxic/oxic and conventional activated sludge), with sludge equally treated by drying and screw pressing. The Best-Case scenario directs all flow to the anoxic/oxic line and treats all sludge through AD with electricity and heat recovery. Compared with the Base Case, the Best-Case scenario reduced energy use by 14%, corresponding to a specific energy savings of 0.04 kWh/m<sup>3</sup>, and achieved annual cost savings of 35,891 USD. The key challenges included limited data on sludge characteristics and disposal practices in Mexico, which required careful adaptation. LCA was enabled through process simulation, which provided site-specific inventory data despite limited regional reporting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 5","pages":"2972 - 2986"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-025-02375-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02375-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The goal of this study is to compare the environmental and energy performance of three sludge management scenarios at a wastewater treatment plant in Mexico, using process simulations and life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess energy use, environmental impacts, and costs. The functional unit is one cubic meter of treated influent wastewater, including sludge treatment and disposal. Screw press, thermal drying, and anaerobic digestion (AD) were assessed for energy use and environmental impacts, focusing on global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and fossil resource scarcity. The Base Case scenario assumes a 50/50 distribution of wastewater flow between two biological treatment lines (anoxic/oxic and conventional activated sludge), with sludge equally treated by drying and screw pressing. The Best-Case scenario directs all flow to the anoxic/oxic line and treats all sludge through AD with electricity and heat recovery. Compared with the Base Case, the Best-Case scenario reduced energy use by 14%, corresponding to a specific energy savings of 0.04 kWh/m3, and achieved annual cost savings of 35,891 USD. The key challenges included limited data on sludge characteristics and disposal practices in Mexico, which required careful adaptation. LCA was enabled through process simulation, which provided site-specific inventory data despite limited regional reporting.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles.
The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management.
The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).