Evaluating sludge management strategies using wastewater treatment plant simulations and life cycle assessment

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Carlos Daniel García-López, Paloma Barajas-Álvarez, Martín Esteban González-López, Frank J. Loge, Jürgen Mahlknecht, Carolina Senés-Guerrero, Misael Sebastián Gradilla-Hernández
{"title":"Evaluating sludge management strategies using wastewater treatment plant simulations and life cycle assessment","authors":"Carlos Daniel García-López,&nbsp;Paloma Barajas-Álvarez,&nbsp;Martín Esteban González-López,&nbsp;Frank J. Loge,&nbsp;Jürgen Mahlknecht,&nbsp;Carolina Senés-Guerrero,&nbsp;Misael Sebastián Gradilla-Hernández","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02375-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this study is to compare the environmental and energy performance of three sludge management scenarios at a wastewater treatment plant in Mexico, using process simulations and life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess energy use, environmental impacts, and costs. The functional unit is one cubic meter of treated influent wastewater, including sludge treatment and disposal. Screw press, thermal drying, and anaerobic digestion (AD) were assessed for energy use and environmental impacts, focusing on global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and fossil resource scarcity. The Base Case scenario assumes a 50/50 distribution of wastewater flow between two biological treatment lines (anoxic/oxic and conventional activated sludge), with sludge equally treated by drying and screw pressing. The Best-Case scenario directs all flow to the anoxic/oxic line and treats all sludge through AD with electricity and heat recovery. Compared with the Base Case, the Best-Case scenario reduced energy use by 14%, corresponding to a specific energy savings of 0.04 kWh/m<sup>3</sup>, and achieved annual cost savings of 35,891 USD. The key challenges included limited data on sludge characteristics and disposal practices in Mexico, which required careful adaptation. LCA was enabled through process simulation, which provided site-specific inventory data despite limited regional reporting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 5","pages":"2972 - 2986"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-025-02375-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02375-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this study is to compare the environmental and energy performance of three sludge management scenarios at a wastewater treatment plant in Mexico, using process simulations and life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess energy use, environmental impacts, and costs. The functional unit is one cubic meter of treated influent wastewater, including sludge treatment and disposal. Screw press, thermal drying, and anaerobic digestion (AD) were assessed for energy use and environmental impacts, focusing on global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and fossil resource scarcity. The Base Case scenario assumes a 50/50 distribution of wastewater flow between two biological treatment lines (anoxic/oxic and conventional activated sludge), with sludge equally treated by drying and screw pressing. The Best-Case scenario directs all flow to the anoxic/oxic line and treats all sludge through AD with electricity and heat recovery. Compared with the Base Case, the Best-Case scenario reduced energy use by 14%, corresponding to a specific energy savings of 0.04 kWh/m3, and achieved annual cost savings of 35,891 USD. The key challenges included limited data on sludge characteristics and disposal practices in Mexico, which required careful adaptation. LCA was enabled through process simulation, which provided site-specific inventory data despite limited regional reporting.

利用污水处理厂模拟和生命周期评估评估污泥管理策略
本研究的目的是比较墨西哥一家污水处理厂三种污泥管理方案的环境和能源绩效,使用过程模拟和生命周期评估(LCA)来评估能源使用、环境影响和成本。功能单位为1立方米处理后的进水废水,包括污泥处理和处置。对螺旋压榨、热干燥和厌氧消化(AD)的能源利用和环境影响进行了评估,重点关注全球变暖潜势、陆地酸化、淡水富营养化和化石资源稀缺。基本情景假设废水在两条生物处理线(缺氧/含氧和常规活性污泥)之间的分配为50/50,污泥通过干燥和螺旋压压同等处理。最好的方案是将所有的废水引导到缺氧/含氧管线,并通过AD处理所有的污泥,同时进行电和热回收。与基本情景相比,最佳情景情景减少了14%的能源使用,相当于0.04千瓦时/立方米的具体能源节约,实现了每年35891美元的成本节约。主要挑战包括关于墨西哥污泥特性和处置做法的数据有限,需要仔细调整。LCA是通过过程模拟实现的,尽管区域报告有限,但它提供了特定地点的库存数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信