M. Khair , J.H. Stansby , P. Bragado , J. Stone , E.S. Sooby
{"title":"Uranium diboride: Understanding and optimizing arc-melt synthesis","authors":"M. Khair , J.H. Stansby , P. Bragado , J. Stone , E.S. Sooby","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.106021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uranium diboride (UB<sub>2</sub>) is considered as a nuclear fuel candidate or burnable absorber for advanced reactors. The present study investigates the arc-melt synthesis of UB<sub>2</sub> and aims to improve understanding and reproducibility of the fabrication method. UB<sub>2</sub>-U, UB<sub>2</sub>, and UB<sub>2</sub>-UB<sub>4</sub> compounds are synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. Direct addition of < ∼7 wt% boron excess, in a single step, results in formation of UB<sub>2</sub>-U, while addition of >∼10 wt% boron excess leads to the formation of UB<sub>2</sub>-UB<sub>4</sub>. Diffraction data shows that material loss during the melt, previously assumed to be volatilization of boron, comprises both uranium and boron in the forms of UB<sub>2</sub> and UB<sub>4</sub>. To mitigate material loss during the melt and facilitate the fabrication of pure UB<sub>2</sub>, a stoichiometric amount of boron is incrementally dissolved into uranium metal using relatively low current (<100 A for 2 g of uranium); after all the boron is incorporated, the ingot is fully melted. Alternatively, microscopy images of UB<sub>2</sub>-U composites can be analyzed to determine the amount of additional boron needed to obtain the UB<sub>2</sub> line compound. In short, this paper details the best practices for the reproducible fabrication of pure UB<sub>2</sub> using the arc-melt method. These methods can be extended to other line compounds where volatilization and high melt temperatures complicate synthesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 106021"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025004196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uranium diboride (UB2) is considered as a nuclear fuel candidate or burnable absorber for advanced reactors. The present study investigates the arc-melt synthesis of UB2 and aims to improve understanding and reproducibility of the fabrication method. UB2-U, UB2, and UB2-UB4 compounds are synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. Direct addition of < ∼7 wt% boron excess, in a single step, results in formation of UB2-U, while addition of >∼10 wt% boron excess leads to the formation of UB2-UB4. Diffraction data shows that material loss during the melt, previously assumed to be volatilization of boron, comprises both uranium and boron in the forms of UB2 and UB4. To mitigate material loss during the melt and facilitate the fabrication of pure UB2, a stoichiometric amount of boron is incrementally dissolved into uranium metal using relatively low current (<100 A for 2 g of uranium); after all the boron is incorporated, the ingot is fully melted. Alternatively, microscopy images of UB2-U composites can be analyzed to determine the amount of additional boron needed to obtain the UB2 line compound. In short, this paper details the best practices for the reproducible fabrication of pure UB2 using the arc-melt method. These methods can be extended to other line compounds where volatilization and high melt temperatures complicate synthesis.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.