Dem investigation of volumetric loss-induced failure mechanisms and soil arching evolution in inherent anisotropic sandy soil strata

IF 5.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Junnan Ren , Qixiang Yan , Jiangtao Wei , Minghui Sun , Yaozhong Cui , Xiaolong Liao
{"title":"Dem investigation of volumetric loss-induced failure mechanisms and soil arching evolution in inherent anisotropic sandy soil strata","authors":"Junnan Ren ,&nbsp;Qixiang Yan ,&nbsp;Jiangtao Wei ,&nbsp;Minghui Sun ,&nbsp;Yaozhong Cui ,&nbsp;Xiaolong Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil arching effect induced by volumetric loss frequently leads to stress redistribution of sandy soil, even resulting in surface subsidence hazards. To systematically investigate the formation and evolution mechanisms of soil arches in inherent anisotropy strata, this paper conducts a set of anisotropic granular packing prepared for trapdoor tests with the objective of examining the effect of bedding angles (<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) in sandy soil on the arching effect by employing the Discrete Element Method (DEM). This investigation systematically presents outcomes encompassing load–displacement curves, arching deformation patterns, and ground response within formations featuring distinct <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>. Furthermore, microscopic analyses are further adopted to endeavor to elucidate the behaviors influenced by <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>. Results indicate that under low fill heights, the specimen with<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> = 0° inclination exhibits a higher minimum load compared to others, attributed to increased bending moments generated by contact forces within the shear band. Specimens with<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> = 30° and 60° inclinations demonstrate significant lateral shifts in their maximum surface settlement points, a behavior accurately captured by the modified Peck formula proposed in this study. Furthermore, a three-stage evolution curve of soil arching is introduced to characterize the failure modes of granular materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101727"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391225002466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil arching effect induced by volumetric loss frequently leads to stress redistribution of sandy soil, even resulting in surface subsidence hazards. To systematically investigate the formation and evolution mechanisms of soil arches in inherent anisotropy strata, this paper conducts a set of anisotropic granular packing prepared for trapdoor tests with the objective of examining the effect of bedding angles (α) in sandy soil on the arching effect by employing the Discrete Element Method (DEM). This investigation systematically presents outcomes encompassing load–displacement curves, arching deformation patterns, and ground response within formations featuring distinct α. Furthermore, microscopic analyses are further adopted to endeavor to elucidate the behaviors influenced by α. Results indicate that under low fill heights, the specimen withα = 0° inclination exhibits a higher minimum load compared to others, attributed to increased bending moments generated by contact forces within the shear band. Specimens withα = 30° and 60° inclinations demonstrate significant lateral shifts in their maximum surface settlement points, a behavior accurately captured by the modified Peck formula proposed in this study. Furthermore, a three-stage evolution curve of soil arching is introduced to characterize the failure modes of granular materials.
固有各向异性砂土地层体积损失破坏机制及土拱演化的Dem研究
由体积损失引起的土拱效应经常引起砂土的应力重分布,甚至造成地表沉降危害。为系统研究固有各向异性地层中土拱的形成与演化机制,采用离散元法(DEM)对砂质土中层理角度(α)对土拱效应的影响进行了一组各向异性颗粒填料的活动门试验研究。这项研究系统地提出了包括荷载-位移曲线、拱形变形模式和具有不同α的地层中的地面响应在内的结果。此外,还进一步采用微观分析来阐明α对其行为的影响。结果表明,在低填充高度下,α = 0°倾角的试样表现出更高的最小荷载,这是由于剪切带内接触力产生的弯矩增加所致。当α = 30°和60°倾角时,试样的最大地表沉降点表现出显著的横向移动,这一行为被本研究中提出的修正Peck公式准确地捕捉到了。此外,还引入了土拱的三阶段演化曲线来表征颗粒材料的破坏模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信